Lint FixCAUTION
Developer-first error tracking and performance monitoring
Overview
Developer-first error tracking and performance monitoring
42a3375c14f5OBSERVED · 2026-09-29What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
--- name: lint-fix description: Fix violations of an eslintPluginScraps rule across the codebase. Use when asked to "fix lint violations", "apply a lint rule", "fix scraps rule errors", "roll out a lint rule", "enforce a rule codebase-wide", or "fix design system lint". Covers manual fixes, autofix, batching, and codemod strategies for large-scale rollouts. --- Fix violations of rule `$0` on files matching `$1`. ## Arguments - `$0` — Rule name (e.g., `use-semantic-token`, `no-core-import`) - `$1` — File or glob pattern (e.g., `static/app/components/`, `static/app/views/alerts/`) ## Step 1: Understand the Rule Before fixing violations, know what the fix looks like. Load [references/fix-patterns.md](references/fix-patterns.md) for per-rule fix details: | Rule | Has autofix? | Fix reference | | ---------------------------- | ------------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | `no-core-import` | Yes | [fix-patterns.md](references/fix-patterns.md) §no-core-import | | `no-token-import` | No | [fix-patterns.md](references/fix-patterns.md) §no-token-import | | `use-semantic-token` | No | [fix-patterns.md](references/fix-patterns.md) + [token-taxonomy.md](references/token-taxonomy.md) | | `restrict-jsx-slot-children` | No | [fix-patterns.md](references/fix-patterns.md) §restrict-jsx-slot-children | For `use-semantic-token` violations, you MUST load [references/token-taxonomy.md](references/token-taxonomy.md) to know which token category to use for each CSS property. ## Step 2: Assess Scale Count violations before choosing a strategy: ```bash pnpm exec eslint --rule '@sentry/scraps/$0: error' "$1" 2>&1 | tail -5 ``` The last line shows the count (e.g., "42 problems (42 errors, 0 warnings)"). **Tip**: Running eslint on all of `static/app/` can take 2+ minutes. Narrow scope to a subdirectory first. ## Step 3: Choose Strategy ### Auto-fixable rule (any scale) ```bash pnpm exec eslint --fix --rule '@sentry/scraps/$0: error' "$1" ``` Always review the diff after `--fix` before committing. If the rule is partially auto-fixable, run `--fix` first, then manually fix remaining violations. ### Under 100 violations — manual agent fix 1. Run eslint on target path 2. Fix violations 5-10 files at a time 3. Re-run after each batch to verify 4. Repeat until clean ### 100-500 violations — batched fix 1. Split target into subdirectories (e.g., `static/app/views/`, `static/app/components/`) 2. Fix one subdirectory at a time 3. Commit after each batch for reviewable PRs 4. Re-run count after each batch to track progress ### 500+ violations — codemod or staged rollout - **Mechanical transforms**: write a temporary jscodeshift codemod or a targeted script using `@typescript-eslint/typescript-estree` - **Import-path rules**: `--fix` usually handles these at any scale - **Complex transforms**: enable the rule as `warn` first, fix in batches across multiple PRs ## Fix Workflow (tight loop) 1. Run: `pnpm exec eslint --rule '@sentry/scraps/$0: error' "$1"` 2. Fix violations in reported files 3. Re-run on changed files to verify 4. Expand scope, repeat ## Coordinating Large Changes - Split PRs to **~50 changed files** based on ownership rules in @.github/CODEOWNERS. - PR title convention: `fix(lint): enforce @sentry/scraps/$0 for <codeowner>` - If the rule is new and not yet in `eslint.config.ts`, **fix all violations first**, then enable the rule in a follow-up PR - Run pre-commit on changed files before committing: ```bash .venv/bin/prek run -q --files <file1> [file2 ...] ``` ## Verification After all fixes: ```bash pnpm exec eslint --rule '@sentry/scraps/$0: error' static/app/ 2>&1 | tail -5 ``` Should report 0 problems.
Trust audit
CAUTIONgrade B · trust 89/100 Install with care. The audit found things worth knowing before you trust its output.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | WARN |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | NA |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (2)
.claude/skills
api-docs/.node-version
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
42a3375c14f5full audit observations/trust-audit/skill/getsentry__lint-fix.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-29 | 42a3375c14f5 | CAUTION | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Lint Fix skill do?
Developer-first error tracking and performance monitoring
Is Lint Fix safe to install?
With care. The audit graded it B (89/100) and found 2 things worth knowing before you trust this skill, listed below with the exact line each was found on.
What can Lint Fix access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (42a3375c14f5), read on 2026-09-29. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.