Agent skill · Audited from source

diagnose

skill · getagentseal/founder-playbookMIT licenceAudited 24 Oct 2026 · source 5015fcf4cde3

★ 773pushed 17 days ago
✓SAFEGrade B · 89/100 · 24 Oct 2026 · 5015fcf
773repo stars · whole getagentseal/founder-playbook

Is it safe? Yes — SAFE, grade B (89/100). We read this skill's source at commit 5015fcf4cde3 and found no filesystem, network or shell access and no hard-coded secrets. What it does: Startup diagnostic router. Use FIRST when a founder doesn't know where to start, has multiple overlapping problems, or asks a vague question like 'what's wrong with my startup', 'why aren't people buying', 'what should…

Ask an AI about this pageGChatGPTCClaudePPerplexityGeGeminiXGrok
More
Cite

Cite this page

ModelsAtlas. “diagnose (getagentseal/founder-playbook)”. Retrieved 24 Oct 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/skills/getagentseal/diagnose

3 skills are called “diagnose”. You are viewing getagentseal/founder-playbook.

Trust audit

Audit 0.4.1 · source read 24 Oct 2026

Trust score89/100✓SAFE B
0 critical0 high0 medium0 low0 info

SAFE means nothing in the source contradicts what the skill says it does. Grade B is shared by 13,985 of 14,816 audited skills.

What the source does

  • FilesystemNone observedNo reads or writes in the source
  • NetworkNone observedNo outbound calls in the source
  • ShellNone observedNo commands run in the source
  • DependenciesPinnedNothing floats
  • SecretsNone foundNo keys in source

Five audit layers

LayerWhat we checkResultFindings
L0 ProvenanceRepo owner, licence, archive status, activityPASS0
L1 Static sourceSecrets, path traversal, supply chain, hidden codeNA0
L2 InstructionsPrompt injection, authority framing, hidden directivesPASS0
L3 InventoryThe files and declarations match the sourcePASS0
L4 SandboxRun in isolation and watch behaviourSKIPPED why0

Gates applied: no behavioural pass.

Findings (0)

No findings at any severity. We re-audit when the source changes.

Audit 0.4.1 · source sha 5015fcf4cde3 · 24 Oct 2026Report an issue or request a re-scan

Provenance

Who published it, and what the verdict is pinned to

  • Publishergetagentseal GitHub organizationOwner of the repository this skill is read from
  • Source foldergetagentseal/founder-playbook/skills/diagnoseThe exact folder we audited
  • LicenceMITAs the repository states it
  • Commit pinned for this verdict5015fcf4cde3A new audit runs when the source changes
  • Repository statusNot archivedLast push 17 days ago
  • Sandboxed runNot runSkills are read, not executed; layer L4 is skipped

What it tells the agent

Full source on GitHub ↗

Its description: Startup diagnostic router. Use FIRST when a founder doesn't know where to start, has multiple overlapping problems, or asks a vague question like 'what's wrong with my startup', 'why aren't people buying', 'what should…

---
name: diagnose
description: "Startup diagnostic router. Use FIRST when a founder doesn't know where to start, has multiple overlapping problems, or asks a vague question like 'what's wrong with my startup', 'why aren't people buying', 'what should I focus on', 'where do I even begin', 'nothing is working'. Routes to the right framework from the 15 available skills — or tells you when no framework fits and you just need to go talk to people. This is the entry point. Use it before reaching for any specific skill."
---

> **Note:** This skill is independent analysis and commentary, not a reproduction of any original text. It synthesizes frameworks from multiple books with modern startup practice and routes founders to the right tool for their situation.

# Diagnose

> "The dangerous moment is when you apply the right framework to the wrong problem."

## When to Use This Skill

```
Do you know exactly what's broken?
|-- YES --> Do you know which framework to use?
|   |-- YES --> Go use that skill directly. You don't need this.
|   +-- NO  --> THIS SKILL. You know the problem, need the tool.
+-- NO  --> THIS SKILL. Start here.
```

This skill exists because frameworks are tools, not answers. A hammer doesn't help when the problem is a screw. The first job is diagnosis — figuring out what's actually broken before reaching for any specific framework.

---

## The Five Failure Modes

Every startup problem maps to one of five root causes. Most founders misdiagnose which one they have.

| Failure Mode | What It Looks Like | Common Misdiagnosis |
|---|---|---|
| **Product** | People try it and stop using it | "We need better marketing" |
| **Market** | Can't find anyone who cares enough to pay | "We need to build more features" |
| **Messaging** | Good product, people don't understand what it does | "The product must be wrong" |
| **Distribution** | People would buy it but never hear about it | "We need a better website" |
| **Pricing** | People want it but won't pay what you charge | "We need more features to justify the price" |

### The Misdiagnosis Problem

Founders almost always misdiagnose their problem by one layer. The pattern:

```
ACTUAL PROBLEM:        WHAT FOUNDERS THINK:        WHAT THEY DO:
Product problem    →   "Marketing isn't working"   →   Spend on ads (waste)
Market problem     →   "Need more features"        →   Build for months (waste)
Messaging problem  →   "Product must be wrong"     →   Pivot prematurely (waste)
Distribution       →   "Need better website"       →   Redesign 5 times (waste)
Pricing problem    →   "Need more value"            →   Add features nobody asked for (waste)
```

---

## The Diagnostic

Answer these honestly. Not what you hope is true — what the evidence says.

### Step 1: Do people want this?

```
Have at least 5 people given you real money (or signed a binding LOI)?
|-- YES --> Go to Step 2.
|-- NO  --> Have you talked to 10+ potential customers about their problem
|           (not your solution)?
|   |-- YES --> Did they describe the problem with emotion and specifics?
|   |   |-- YES --> You probably have a messaging, pricing, or distribution
|   |   |           problem. Go to Step 2.
|   |   +-- NO  --> You might have a MARKET problem. The problem you're
|   |               solving may not be painful enough to pay for.
|   |               → Use mom-test to validate the problem exists.
|   |               → Use four-steps Customer Discovery process.
|   +-- NO  --> STOP. You are guessing. Nothing else matters until you
|               talk to real people. → Use mom-test.
```

### Step 2: Can people understand what you do?

```
Show your website/pitch to a stranger for 5 seconds. Can they tell you:
  1. What you offer?
  2. How it makes their life better?
  3. What they should do next?

All 3 clear?
|-- YES --> Go to Step 3.
|-- NO  --> You have a MESSAGING problem.
|           → Use storybrand to restructure your message.
|           → Use made-to-stick to make individual messages land.
|           → Use obviously-awesome if the confusion is about
|             what category you belong in.
```

### Step 3: Are the right people finding you?

```
Are potential customers discovering your product?
|-- YES, enough volume → Go to Step 4.
|-- YES, but wrong people → You have a POSITIONING problem.
|   → Use obviously-awesome to redefine your target segment.
|   → Use crossing-the-chasm if you're reaching innovators
|     but need pragmatists.
|-- NO → You have a DISTRIBUTION problem.
|   → Use traction to systematically test channels.
|   → Use 100m-leads for tactical execution in chosen channels.
|   → Use money-models if you can't AFFORD the channels that work (make acquisition self-funding first).
```

### Step 4: Are they buying?

```
People find you, understand you, but don't buy. Why?
|-- "Too expensive" → PRICING problem.
|   → Use monetizing-innovation to redesign price+product together.
|   → Use 100m-offers to repackage the offer.
|-- "Not sure it'll work for me" → TRUST problem.
|   → Use influence (social proof, authority).
|   → Use storybrand (guide authority + testimonials).
|-- "I'll think about it" (then ghost) → URGENCY problem.
|   → Use 100m-offers (scarcity, urgency, bonuses, guarantees).
|   → Use influence (scarcity, commitment/consistency).
|-- "Went with competitor" → POSITIONING problem.
|   → Use obviously-awesome to find your unique value.
|   → Use blue-ocean-strategy if the market is commoditized.
|-- Signing up but churning → PRODUCT problem.
|   → Use lean-startup to measure and iterate.
|   → Use mom-test to understand why they leave.
|-- Buying once but never again / LTV too low to fund growth → MONEY MODEL problem.
|   → Use money-models (upsells, downsells, continuity).
```

### Step 5: Is the sales process working?

```
For B2B / high-touch sales:
|-- Meetings happen but deals stall → SALES PROCESS problem.
|   → Use spin-selling for the conversation structure.
|   → Use influence for persuasion mechanics.
|-- C

Excerpt, first 6,000 characters of SKILL.md, verbatim from the audited commit. It is text from someone else’s repository, quoted so you can judge it before your agent reads it.

Install

Pinned to the audited commit 5015fcf

Download folder ↗
git clone https://github.com/getagentseal/founder-playbook
git -C founder-playbook checkout 5015fcf4cde3

The author documents no install command, so this uses the repository directly. Our verdict covers commit 5015fcf4cde3 only.

Works in

The author has not said which agents this skill supports, and we have not tested it in any.

Audit history

Every audit, every source change

  1. ✓SAFE B 89 / 100

    first audit · source 5015fcf4cde3

Similar skills

Questions about diagnose

What does the diagnose skill do?
15 proven business books distilled into AI-native skills. Works with Claude Code, ChatGPT, Gemini, Cursor.
Is diagnose safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can diagnose access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (5015fcf4cde3), read on 2026-10-24. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.

Sources

Spotted something wrong? Report a correction · Methodology

Keep going in your AI

Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.