Agent skill · Audited from source
Communicating Concisely
skill · GanyuanRan/AegisMIT licenceAudited 18 Oct 2026 · source 177240a262fe
Is it safe? Yes — SAFE, grade B (89/100). We read this skill's source at commit 177240a262fe and found no filesystem, network or shell access and no hard-coded secrets. What it does: Use when the user asks for caveman mode, fewer tokens, brief responses, compressed communication, or otherwise explicitly requests a much shorter answer.
Cite
Cite this page
ModelsAtlas. “Communicating Concisely (GanyuanRan/Aegis)”. Retrieved 18 Oct 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/skills/ganyuanran/communicating-concisely
Trust audit
Audit 0.4.1 · source read 18 Oct 2026
SAFE means nothing in the source contradicts what the skill says it does. Grade B is shared by 13,985 of 14,816 audited skills.
What the source does
- FilesystemNone observedNo reads or writes in the source
- NetworkNone observedNo outbound calls in the source
- ShellNone observedNo commands run in the source
- DependenciesPinnedNothing floats
- SecretsNone foundNo keys in source
Five audit layers
| Layer | What we check | Result | Findings |
|---|---|---|---|
L0 Provenance | Repo owner, licence, archive status, activity | PASS | 0 |
L1 Static source | Secrets, path traversal, supply chain, hidden code | NA | 0 |
L2 Instructions | Prompt injection, authority framing, hidden directives | PASS | 0 |
L3 Inventory | The files and declarations match the source | PASS | 0 |
L4 Sandbox | Run in isolation and watch behaviour | SKIPPED why | 0 |
Gates applied: no behavioural pass.
Findings (0)
No findings at any severity. We re-audit when the source changes.
Audit 0.4.1 · source sha 177240a262fe · 18 Oct 2026Report an issue or request a re-scan
Provenance
Who published it, and what the verdict is pinned to
- PublisherGanyuanRan GitHub userOwner of the repository this skill is read from
- Source folderGanyuanRan/Aegis/skills/communicating-conciselyThe exact folder we audited
- LicenceMITAs the repository states it
- Commit pinned for this verdict177240a262feA new audit runs when the source changes
- Repository statusNot archivedPushed today
- Sandboxed runNot runSkills are read, not executed; layer L4 is skipped
What it tells the agent
Full source on GitHub ↗Its description: Use when the user asks for caveman mode, fewer tokens, brief responses, compressed communication, or otherwise explicitly requests a much shorter answer.
--- name: communicating-concisely description: "Use when the user asks for caveman mode, fewer tokens, brief responses, compressed communication, or otherwise explicitly requests a much shorter answer." --- # Communicating Concisely ## Activation Triggered by: "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "use caveman", "less tokens", "be brief", or `/communicating-concisely`. Once active, applies to EVERY response until explicitly deactivated. ## Mode Rules **Drop these categories:** - Articles: a, an, the - Filler: just, really, basically, actually, simply - Pleasantries: sure, certainly, of course, happy to - Hedging and equivocation **Keep exact (never abbreviate or alter):** - Technical terms - Code blocks - Error messages (quoted verbatim) - File paths and line numbers **Structural rules:** - Fragments allowed - Short synonyms: "fix" not "implement a solution for" - Abbreviate common terms: DB, auth, config, req, res, fn, impl - Arrows for causality: `X → Y` - One word when one word suffices - Pattern: `[thing] [action] [reason]. [next step].` **Example:** Don't: "Sure! I'd be happy to help you with that. The issue you're experiencing is likely caused by..." Do: "Bug in auth middleware. Token expiry check uses `<` not `<=`. Fix:" ## Auto-Clarity Exception Temporarily exit caveman mode for: 1. Security warnings 2. Irreversible action confirmations 3. Multi-step sequences where fragment order risks misread 4. User asks for clarification or repeats their question After the clear section finishes, resume caveman. Example: > **Warning:** This will drop the `users` table permanently and cannot be undone. > ```sql > DROP TABLE users; > ``` > Caveman resume. Verify backup exists first. ## Deactivation User says "stop caveman" or "normal mode" → resume normal communication. ## Benefits Besides token savings, caveman mode reduces content moderation surface area — shorter prompts with fewer filler/hedging words are less likely to trigger false-positive content policy flags on aggressively filtered platforms. ## Red Flags - Never drop technical precision for brevity - Never abbreviate security-relevant terms - Never use caveman for user-facing documentation or commit messages
Excerpt, first 2,220 characters of SKILL.md, verbatim from the audited commit. It is text from someone else’s repository, quoted so you can judge it before your agent reads it.
Install
Pinned to the audited commit 177240a
git clone https://github.com/GanyuanRan/Aegis git -C Aegis checkout 177240a262fe
The author documents no install command, so this uses the repository directly. Our verdict covers commit 177240a262fe only.
Works in
The author has not said which agents this skill supports, and we have not tested it in any.
Audit history
Every audit, every source change
- ✓SAFE B 89 / 100
first audit · source
177240a262fe
README badge
For maintainers · shows the latest audit
[](https://modelsatlas.com/skills/ganyuanran/communicating-concisely/)
The badge shows our verdict and grade for this skill, and links back to this page. It changes when the audit does.
Similar skills
All coding & review skills →GanyuanRan/Aegis
Use when defining ambiguous or high-complexity new features, product behavior, UI/component design, architecture choices, contract changes, or when grilling/pressure-testing a plan or design. Routine small requests stay…
GanyuanRan/Aegis
Use when facing 2+ independent tasks without a written plan, with no conflicting shared mutable state or sequential dependencies, where parallel delegation beats inline cost; otherwise inline. Planned tasks use…
GanyuanRan/Aegis
Use when the user asks to establish shared project language, or project work exposes a conflicting, renamed, or deprecated domain term that needs active semantic modeling. Routine small tasks stay on the fast path.
GanyuanRan/Aegis
Use when executing a written implementation plan across sessions or with review checkpoints. Small or single-slice plans stay inline. For same-session independent tasks, use subagent-driven-development instead.
GanyuanRan/Aegis
Use when verified work needs integration or cleanup of an existing task-created branch/worktree, or the user explicitly requests merge, PR, or branch lifecycle handling.
GanyuanRan/Aegis
Use when asked for first-principles or Occam's-razor review, or when high-risk decisions involve competing constraints, fallback growth, duplicate owners, or architecture direction risk. Ordinary bug fixes stay on the…
Add this badge to your README
[](https://modelsatlas.com/skills/ganyuanran/communicating-concisely/)
<a href="https://modelsatlas.com/skills/ganyuanran/communicating-concisely/"><img src="https://modelsatlas.com/skills/ganyuanran/communicating-concisely/badge.svg" alt="ModelsAtlas: SAFE B"></a>
Questions about Communicating Concisely
What does the Communicating Concisely skill do?
Is Communicating Concisely safe to install?
What can Communicating Concisely access on my machine?
How current is this page?
Sources
- github.com/GanyuanRan/Aegis/tree/main/skills/communicating-conci — the audited source at commit 177240a262fe and every finding aboveObserved · 18 Oct 2026
Spotted something wrong? Report a correction · Methodology
Keep going in your AI
Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.
- What does the Communicating Concisely skill do?
- Is Communicating Concisely safe to install?
- What can Communicating Concisely access on my machine?