Review PrSAFE
Battle-tested Claude Code, OpenAI Codex, Cursor configs, plugins, hooks and agents with Kimi, MiniMax and GLM API support.
Overview
Battle-tested Claude Code, OpenAI Codex, Cursor configs, plugins, hooks and agents with Kimi, MiniMax and GLM API support.
ae618ef5da66OBSERVED · 2026-10-12What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
--- name: review-pr description: This skill should be used when user asks to "review a PR", "review pull request", "review this pr", "code review this PR", "check PR #N", provides a GitHub PR URL, or explicitly invokes "review-pr". --- # Review PR Review a pull request for bugs, regressions, missing tests, and risky changes. When explicitly invoked with extra text, treat that text as the PR number or URL. If no PR reference is provided, infer it from the current branch. ## Process 1. **Preferred execution** - If subagents are available, use `github-dev:pr-reviewer` and pass the PR reference. - Otherwise follow the manual steps below. 2. **Parse PR reference** - If a PR number or URL is provided, extract owner, repo, and PR number. - If not, auto-detect the PR from the current branch with `gh pr view --json number,headRefName`. 3. **Fetch PR data** - Use `gh pr diff <number>` for the full diff. - Use `gh pr view <number> --json files` for the changed file list. - Skip generated or vendored files such as `.lock`, `.min.js`, `.min.css`, `dist/`, `build/`, `vendor/`, `node_modules/`, `_pb2.py`, and images. 4. **Review focus** - Only report issues that require fixes. - Only review PR changes, never pre-existing issues in unchanged code. - Prioritize bugs, security issues, breaking changes, performance issues, edge cases, and missing tests. - Combine related issues that share the same root cause. - Keep the list short and high signal. 5. **Review comment rules** - Only create pending PR comments, never submit or confirm the review automatically. - Use `gh` for GitHub operations. - Start comments in lowercase, keep them short, avoid end punctuation when possible. - Use simple language for both bot-facing and human-facing comments. ## Output Format If issues are found, report them in descending severity with file references and a final recommendation of `NEEDS_CHANGES`. If no issues are found, return `APPROVE - No fixes required`.
Trust audit
SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | NA |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (3)
.claude/output-styles/adhd-explanatory.md
AGENTS.md
GEMINI.md
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
ae618ef5da66full audit observations/trust-audit/skill/fcakyon__review-pr.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-12 | ae618ef5da66 | SAFE | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Review Pr skill do?
Battle-tested Claude Code, OpenAI Codex, Cursor configs, plugins, hooks and agents with Kimi, MiniMax and GLM API support.
Is Review Pr safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Review Pr access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (ae618ef5da66), read on 2026-10-12. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.