Atlas / Skills / fcakyon / Review Pr

Review PrSAFE

skills/fcakyon/review-pr

Battle-tested Claude Code, OpenAI Codex, Cursor configs, plugins, hooks and agents with Kimi, MiniMax and GLM API support.

Verdict
SAFE
Grade
B
Trust score
89 /100
Version
—
Hosts
—
License
Apache-2.0
Stars
1,174
01

Overview

Battle-tested Claude Code, OpenAI Codex, Cursor configs, plugins, hooks and agents with Kimi, MiniMax and GLM API support.

Read from source at commit ae618ef5da66OBSERVED · 2026-10-12
02

What it tells the agent

The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.

---
name: review-pr
description: This skill should be used when user asks to "review a PR", "review pull request", "review this pr", "code review this PR", "check PR #N", provides a GitHub PR URL, or explicitly invokes "review-pr".
---

# Review PR

Review a pull request for bugs, regressions, missing tests, and risky changes.

When explicitly invoked with extra text, treat that text as the PR number or URL. If no PR
reference is provided, infer it from the current branch.

## Process

1. **Preferred execution**
   - If subagents are available, use `github-dev:pr-reviewer` and pass the PR reference.
   - Otherwise follow the manual steps below.

2. **Parse PR reference**
   - If a PR number or URL is provided, extract owner, repo, and PR number.
   - If not, auto-detect the PR from the current branch with `gh pr view --json number,headRefName`.

3. **Fetch PR data**
   - Use `gh pr diff <number>` for the full diff.
   - Use `gh pr view <number> --json files` for the changed file list.
   - Skip generated or vendored files such as `.lock`, `.min.js`, `.min.css`, `dist/`, `build/`, `vendor/`, `node_modules/`, `_pb2.py`, and images.

4. **Review focus**
   - Only report issues that require fixes.
   - Only review PR changes, never pre-existing issues in unchanged code.
   - Prioritize bugs, security issues, breaking changes, performance issues, edge cases, and missing tests.
   - Combine related issues that share the same root cause.
   - Keep the list short and high signal.

5. **Review comment rules**
   - Only create pending PR comments, never submit or confirm the review automatically.
   - Use `gh` for GitHub operations.
   - Start comments in lowercase, keep them short, avoid end punctuation when possible.
   - Use simple language for both bot-facing and human-facing comments.

## Output Format

If issues are found, report them in descending severity with file references and a final
recommendation of `NEEDS_CHANGES`.

If no issues are found, return `APPROVE - No fixes required`.
03

Trust audit

SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.

LayerWhat it checksResult
L0Provenance & inventoryPASS
L1Static analysis of the codeNA
L2Instruction surface (what it tells the agent)PASS
L3Class-specific surfacePASS
L4Behavioural (sandbox)SKIPPED

What the source does

Filesystem
none-observed
Network
none-observed
Shell
none-observed
Dependencies
pinned
Secrets in source
none-found

Findings (3)

LOWInventory / provenance · inv.symlink · CWE-1104
.claude/output-styles/adhd-explanatory.md
.claude/output-styles/adhd-explanatory.md
Why it matters. link not followed
LOWInventory / provenance · inv.symlink · CWE-1104
AGENTS.md
AGENTS.md
Why it matters. link not followed
LOWInventory / provenance · inv.symlink · CWE-1104
GEMINI.md
GEMINI.md
Why it matters. link not followed

Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.

Audited 2026-10-12 · audit v0.4.1 · source sha ae618ef5da66full audit observations/trust-audit/skill/fcakyon__review-pr.json · Report an issue / request a re-scan
04

Audit history

Every audit this skill has had.

DateSourceVerdictGradeScoreChange
2026-10-12ae618ef5da66SAFEB89first audit
05

Questions

What does the Review Pr skill do?

Battle-tested Claude Code, OpenAI Codex, Cursor configs, plugins, hooks and agents with Kimi, MiniMax and GLM API support.

Is Review Pr safe to install?

The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.

What can Review Pr access on my machine?

The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.

How current is this page?

The grade is for one exact copy of the source (ae618ef5da66), read on 2026-10-12. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.

Advertisement