Competitor AnalysisCAUTION

Open source alternative to Semrush and Ahrefs

The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.

---
name: competitor-analysis
description: "Analyze one competitor's organic footprint, ranking keywords, content themes, backlinks, and gaps."
---

# OpenSEO Competitor Analysis

## Goal

Analyze one competitor deeply enough to decide what to learn from, avoid, counter-position against, or outrank.

Use this for a named competitor. For identifying the market leaders first, use `competitive-landscape`.

## Required inputs

- `projectId`
- Competitor domain
- User's domain when comparison is requested
- Optional topic/category/location/language

## Project context

The project-context tools are free and shared with the app and other agents.

1. Call `get_project_context` first and ground the analysis in it — the saved competitors say whether this domain is already known and what was concluded about it before.
2. This skill needs competitors. If none are saved, run a minimal inline setup: save the competitor being analyzed, and ask the user (or infer from `find_serp_competitors` and confirm) whether there are others, write them back with `update_project_context` (`addCompetitors`), then continue the analysis. Never front-load the full interview; suggest `seo-project-setup` at the end for the rest.
3. Before spending credits, check the research log. If the same research ran within the last 30 days, reuse that result and say so instead of re-buying it.
4. On finish, write back what is durable with `update_project_context` — an `addCompetitors` upsert for this domain with a short note on its strengths and where it is vulnerable — and append a research log entry: `{ appendResearchLog: { summary: "Competitor analysis: <domain>. Verdict: <conclusion>" } }`.

## Deliver as a report

Deliver through the `seo-report` skill, saving with `skill: "competitor-analysis"`. If that skill is not available, say so and stop before writing HTML.

## OpenSEO MCP tools

- `get_domain_overview`: baseline organic traffic and keyword count.
- `get_search_console_performance`: when comparing to the user's own domain and Search Console is connected, use it as the first-party baseline (real clicks/impressions/CTR/position) instead of estimating the user's own performance from third-party data.
- `get_ranked_keywords`: exact keyword, URL, rank, intent, traffic, CPC, and SERP-type rows for the competitor domain or page.
- `get_backlinks_overview`: backlink/referring-domain profile.
- `find_serp_competitors`: validate whether the named competitor is a real search competitor across the target keyword set.
- `search_local_businesses`, `get_local_serp_results`, and `get_google_business_questions`: use for local SEO competitors when Maps/local-pack visibility, nearby businesses, categories, or Google Q&A matter.
- `get_serp_results`: validate direct head-to-head SERPs for important keywords.
- `research_keywords`: expand gaps or category terms when needed.

## Workflow

1. Call `get_domain_overview` for the competitor, passing provided location/language when supported.
2. If comparing to the user, call `get_domain_overview` for the user's domain too — and if Search Console is connected, `get_search_console_performance` for the user's real baseline.
3. Call `get_ranked_keywords` for the competitor. Use filters like `maxRank`, `minSearchVolume`, `excludeBrandTerms`, and `resultTypes` to keep rows relevant.
4. If comparing to the user, call `get_ranked_keywords` for the user's domain/page too, or use `get_serp_results` for the shared terms when a lighter check is enough.
5. For local SEO, use `search_local_businesses` and `get_local_serp_results` around the relevant business location(s) before drawing local-pack conclusions. Add `get_google_business_questions` only when Q&A evidence matters.
6. Use `find_serp_competitors` when the competitor was supplied by the user but its search overlap is unclear.
7. Group competitor keywords into themes:
   - Product/category terms
   - Alternatives/comparisons
   - Templates/tools/calculators
   - Educational guides
   - Branded demand
   - Local/neighborhood terms when relevant
8. Call `get_backlinks_overview` for the competitor, especially if authority appears to explain rankings. Continue without backlink evidence if it is unavailable.
9. Use `get_serp_results` for important shared or target keywords to compare positioning, passing provided location/language when supported.
10. Produce an actionable plan:
    - What they are doing well
    - Where they are vulnerable
    - Which pages/keywords to pursue
    - What to avoid copying

## Output format

`h1`: the competitor domain.

If a report template applies (see `seo-report`), its sections and tone replace this list.

Sections in this order:

1. **Snapshot** — one or two opening sentences, then a table of the competitor's organic footprint (traffic estimate, keyword count, referring domains). Add the user's domain as a second row when comparing.
2. **The biggest lesson** — one finding.
3. **Where they are vulnerable** — one finding per opening, ordered by how winnable it is.
4. **Keyword themes** — a table of theme, example keywords, volume, and whether the user competes there. A bar chart when a few themes dominate the footprint.
5. **Content patterns and authority** — prose, with a note for anything inferred from keyword rows rather than seen on a page.
6. **What to do next** — an ordered list, shortest useful.
7. **How this report was made** — opens with the skill link line from `seo-report`, pointing at `https://openseo.so/docs/skills/competitor-analysis` ("OpenSEO Competitor Analysis skill"), then which tools reported what, and what you checked yourself.

## Guardrails

- Do not treat all competitor keywords as desirable. Filter for business fit.
- Separate evidence from inference.
- Do not infer competitor page/content-type patterns from keyword rows alone; use SERP or web evidence for page-level claims.
- For local SEO, do not infer Maps/local-pack strength from national organic domain metrics alone; use local business and local

CAUTIONgrade B · trust 87/100 Install with care. The audit found things worth knowing before you trust its output.

What the source does

Filesystem

none-observed

Network

none-observed

Shell

none-observed

Dependencies

pinned

Secrets in source

none-found

Findings (7)

.claude/skills/create-repo-skill

.claude/skills/deslop

.claude/skills/evaluate-skill

.claude/skills/merge-ready

.claude/skills/observability-triage

write back what is durable with `update_project_context` — an `addCompetitors` upsert

append a research log entry: `{ appendResearchLog: { summary: "Competitor analysis: <domain>.

Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.

[![ModelsAtlas audit: Competitor Analysis](https://modelsatlas.com/skills/every-app/competitor-analysis/badge.svg)](https://modelsatlas.com/skills/every-app/competitor-analysis/)

Not your listing, or something out of date? Claim or update your listing.