write-swiftSAFE
Skills for Designers and Engineers.
Overview
Skills for Designers and Engineers.
6ac375ac24f6OBSERVED · 2026-10-15What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
---
name: write-swift
description: How to write modern Swift well — modeling with value types, Swift 6 data-race safety and approachable concurrency (@concurrent, main-actor-by-default, actors, task groups), protocols and generics (some vs any), API design, performance and ARC, Swift Testing, macros, and the modern language features agents don't know about yet. Use when writing, reviewing, or migrating Swift, or when a concurrency error, a hang, a data race, a retain cycle, or a performance problem needs fixing.
---
# Write Swift
## Initial Response
When this skill is first invoked without a specific question, respond only with:
> I'm ready to help you write modern Swift, the way the language wants to be written.
Do not provide any other information until the user asks a question.
How to write Swift the way the language wants to be written, current through Swift 6.4.
**Toolchain baseline: Swift 6.3** (current release as of August 2026). Everything here compiles on 6.3 unless marked ⚠, which flags unreleased Swift 6.4 features. Concurrency guidance assumes the Swift 6.2 model — if the project is on 6.1 or earlier, §3's rules about `async` and `@concurrent` do not apply.
The through-line: **Swift is a progressive-disclosure language. Start with the simplest, most static, most single-threaded thing that works, and buy dynamism — concurrency, reference semantics, existentials, unsafe pointers — only where you can point at the reason.** Every rule below is an application of that.
Model this hierarchy of defaults. Move down a level only with a reason you can state:
| Need | Reach for | Move down only when |
| ------------ | ----------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------- |
| Data | `struct` / `enum` | you need identity, sharing, or inheritance |
| Abstraction | concrete type | you have repeated code across types |
| Polymorphism | `some P` (generic) | you need heterogeneous storage → `any P` |
| Execution | main actor, synchronous | profiling shows a hang → `async` → `@concurrent` → `actor` |
| Memory | `Array`, `String` | profiling shows the cost → `InlineArray`, `Span` |
| Safety | safe API | C interop or a measured hot path → `Unsafe*` |
---
## 1. Model data with value types
Value types are the default in Swift, not a special case.
- **Default to `struct` and `enum`. Use `class` only for identity, shared mutable state, inheritance, or resource lifetime.** A window, a database connection, an entity stored in a rendering engine — those have identity. A `Point`, a `Drink`, a `Material` does not.
- **`let` by default; `var` only when you mutate.** This is the same discipline as `some` before `any` and value before reference: start narrow, widen with cause.
- **A struct with a mutable reference-type property is neither a value nor a reference.** Copies share the object; mutations leak across copies. Either keep the referenced type immutable, expose only computed properties that forward to it, or make it a `private` stored property behind copy-on-write.
- **Copy-on-write is how you get out-of-line storage _and_ value semantics.** Wrap a final class in a struct and check `isKnownUniquelyReferenced(&storage)` before mutating; copy first if it isn't. This is exactly how `Array`, `String`, and `Dictionary` work.
- **Enums are the tool for "a fixed set of things" and for mutually exclusive state.** Replacing a pile of optional stored properties (`isSharing`, `selectedRows`, `shareTarget`) with one `enum State` makes invalid combinations unrepresentable and makes state change atomic instead of a sequence of property writes you can forget to finish.
- **Composing values yields a value.** A struct whose stored properties are all value types has value semantics for free — which is what makes undo, diffing, and state restoration a single code path instead of one per property.
```swift
struct Material { // value semantics preserved
var roughness: Double
private var _texture: Texture // a class
var color: Color {
get { _texture.color }
set {
if !isKnownUniquelyReferenced(&_texture) { _texture = Texture(copying: _texture) }
_texture.color = newValue
}
}
}
```
**Noncopyable types** (`~Copyable`) express unique ownership: a file descriptor, a bank transfer, an open resource. Suppressing the copy turns "you must not run this twice" from an assertion into a compile error, and makes `deinit` on a struct meaningful. Mark the finishing method `consuming` so the compiler proves it's the last use. Parameter ownership becomes explicit: `borrowing` (read-only, the default), `consuming` (takes it away), `inout`/`mutating` (temporary write access).
---
## 2. Errors and optionals — make the failure paths visible
Swift error handling rests on three points: sources of error are marked so they can't surprise you; errors carry enough context to act on; and **recoverable errors are different from programmer mistakes**.
- **Recoverable → `throw`. Programmer mistake → `precondition`/`fatalError`.** A failed network call keeps the program running. An out-of-bounds index means the code is wrong and must halt before the bug becomes a security issue.
- **Enums with associated values make the best error types.** `case duplicateFriend(String)` beats `case duplicateFriend` — the context is the whole point.
- **`guard` for error conditions**, because it forces the exit path. `if let` for the ordinary unwrap.
- **Typed throws (`throws(MyError)`) are for internal functions, error-forwarding generic code, and constrained environments** where boxing `any Error` is too costly. For public API, untyped `throws` preserves your freedom to change the error type later. Note the unification: `throws` is `throws(any Error)`, andTrust audit
SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | NA |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (0)
No findings outside the package's declared scope.
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
6ac375ac24f6full audit observations/trust-audit/skill/emilkowalski__write-swift.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-15 | 6ac375ac24f6 | SAFE | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the write-swift skill do?
Skills for Designers and Engineers.
Is write-swift safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can write-swift access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (6ac375ac24f6), read on 2026-10-15. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.
Add this badge to your README
Shows this page's audit result and links back to it. It updates when the audit does.
[](https://modelsatlas.com/skills/emilkowalski/write-swift/)
Not your listing, or something out of date? Claim or update your listing.