Atlas / Skills / elementalsouls / Evidence Hygiene

Evidence HygieneSAFE

skills/elementalsouls/evidence-hygiene

A Claude Code skill bundle for bug hunting and external red-team work - 82 skills, 15 slash commands, 681 disclosed-report patterns curated across 24 core vulnerability classes, plus enterprise identity + infrastructure attack matrices.

Verdict
SAFE
Grade
B
Trust score
89 /100
Version
—
Hosts
—
License
MIT
Stars
4,862
01

Overview

A Claude Code skill bundle for bug hunting and external red-team work - 82 skills, 15 slash commands, 681 disclosed-report patterns curated across 24 core vulnerability classes, plus enterprise identity + infrastructure attack matrices.

Read from source at commit c84f314844f2OBSERVED · 2026-10-10
02

What it tells the agent

The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.

---
name: evidence-hygiene
description: "Evidence-capture and PoC-redaction discipline for bug-bounty submissions: cookie redaction protocol (which fields to mask, Preview annotation / Burp panel hiding / DevTools workflow), PII black-bar discipline (what to mask in other-user data — names, emails, phones, faces — vs what is safe to leave — usernames, trace IDs, request bodies), HAR file sanitization (jq filters for Cookie/Set-Cookie/Authorization headers), Burp Repeater/Intruder screenshot hygiene (hide request body, show only Results table for rate-limit attacks), Chrome DevTools Console PoC patterns (credentials include so cookies are not echoed, labeled console.log), screenshot capture order, filename conventions, post-submission rotation hygiene. Use BEFORE any PoC screenshot, BEFORE attaching a HAR, or whenever preparing evidence with session cookies or other-user PII. Pairs with bugcrowd-reporting and report-writing."
sources: community, operator_experience
---

# EVIDENCE HYGIENE — PoC Capture & Redaction Discipline

> Use this skill BEFORE capturing any screenshot, exporting any HAR, or attaching any evidence to a bug-bounty submission. It catches the most common evidence-hygiene mistakes that cause cookies to leak, PII to be shared without consent, or screenshots to be unsuitable for triage.

The core principle: **Bug-bounty evidence is meant to convince a triager. Anything beyond that — live cookies, real-user PII, internal trace IDs that aren't useful — should not be in the evidence.**

---

## 1. Two Categories of Sensitive Data

Every PoC artifact (screenshot, HAR, raw HTTP request, terminal transcript) potentially contains data that needs different treatment.

| Category | Examples | Treatment |
|---|---|---|
| **Your-account secrets** | Session cookies, OAuth tokens, refresh tokens, API keys | Always redact. Even in private bug-bounty platform attachments. Your account, your session — protect it. |
| **Other users' PII** | Real names, emails, phone numbers, addresses, profile photos, account IDs | Redact unless explicitly demonstrating cross-account impact. Even then, mask faces and minimize the data you display. |
| **Triager-useful metadata** | Trace IDs (`x-datadog-trace-id`), request IDs, server timestamps, your test account UID/email, GraphQL operation names, response shapes | **Leave visible** — these help the triager correlate to logs and reproduce. |
| **Test-account passwords (limited use)** | Throwaway passwords on a test account (e.g., `Testing@5678`) | Acceptable in screenshots if you rotate immediately after submission so the value shown is dead. Don't leave real-use passwords in evidence. |

---

## 2. Cookie Redaction Protocol

### 2.1 What must be masked

The session cookie value is the highest-value secret in any PoC. Mask:

- The session cookie (`authn`, `session`, `sid`, `__Secure-id`, etc. — name varies per target)
- `csrf-token` if it's bound to your session
- `Authorization` headers (Bearer tokens, JWT)
- `Cookie` request header values for any session-bearing cookie
- `Set-Cookie` response header values for any session-bearing cookie

### 2.2 What's safe to leave visible

- Cloudflare cookies (`__cf_bm`, `_cfuvid`) — these are bot-management, not session-bearing
- Analytics cookies (`ajs_anonymous_id`, `_ga`)
- Trace correlation IDs (`x-datadog-trace-id`, `x-request-id`)
- Server / framework headers (`Server: cloudflare`, `X-Frame-Options`)
- Your test account email/UID (per Bugcrowdninja alias section in `bugcrowd-reporting`)

### 2.3 Redaction methods (ranked by practicality)

**Method A — Don't capture the cookies in the first place** (preferred when possible)
- For DevTools Console PoCs: use `credentials: 'include'` so the browser sends cookies automatically. Console output won't echo the cookie. Screenshot the Console output, never the Network tab Headers panel.
- For Burp Repeater PoCs: drag the bottom request/response panel divider DOWN to hide the request body before screenshotting. Capture only the Results table for Intruder runs.

**Method B — Black-bar in image editor** (when capture inevitably includes cookies)
- macOS: Open screenshot in Preview → Tools → Annotate → Rectangle → set fill color to black → drag rectangle over the cookie value → save
- Windows: Use Snip & Sketch's annotation tools or any image editor (Paint.NET, etc.)
- Burp itself: in Burp's Proxy → Match and Replace, you can pre-emptively redact cookie values to placeholder strings before screenshotting

**Method C — Find/replace in raw text** (for HAR files, terminal transcripts)
- See §4 for the jq commands

### 2.4 Pre-screenshot checklist

Before clicking Capture:

```
[ ] Network tab Headers panel is collapsed or out of frame
[ ] Burp's Request panel is hidden behind the divider drag
[ ] No "Copy as cURL" output is visible on screen
[ ] DevTools Application → Storage → Cookies tab is closed
[ ] Browser URL bar doesn't show a session token in query string (rare but possible)
```

After capturing:

```
[ ] Open the screenshot at full resolution before saving
[ ] Search for the session cookie name substring in any visible text — if present, redact
[ ] Search for the literal first 6 chars of your cookie value — if present, redact
[ ] Compare to the previous PoC screenshot in the same engagement — same redaction discipline
```

---

## 3. PII Black-Bar Protocol

When a PoC necessarily exposes another user's data (e.g., demonstrating IDOR by showing the victim's email in an attacker-session response), redact the actual PII even in private attachments.

### 3.1 What to mask (other-user data)

- First name, last name (full or partial)
- Email address (mask the local part; can leave domain if non-identifying)
- Phone number (mask the last 7 digits, optionally leave country code)
- Physical address (mask everything below city)
- Date of birth (mask the year, optionally the month)
- Government IDs (SSN, passport — mask everything)
- Profile photos / face images (black-bar the fa
03

Trust audit

SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.

LayerWhat it checksResult
L0Provenance & inventoryPASS
L1Static analysis of the codeNA
L2Instruction surface (what it tells the agent)PASS
L3Class-specific surfacePASS
L4Behavioural (sandbox)SKIPPED

What the source does

Filesystem
none-observed
Network
none-observed
Shell
none-observed
Dependencies
pinned
Secrets in source
none-found

Findings (0)

No findings outside the package's declared scope.

Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.

Audited 2026-10-10 · audit v0.4.1 · source sha c84f314844f2full audit observations/trust-audit/skill/elementalsouls__evidence-hygiene.json · Report an issue / request a re-scan
04

Audit history

Every audit this skill has had.

DateSourceVerdictGradeScoreChange
2026-10-10c84f314844f2SAFEB89first audit
05

Questions

What does the Evidence Hygiene skill do?

A Claude Code skill bundle for bug hunting and external red-team work - 82 skills, 15 slash commands, 681 disclosed-report patterns curated across 24 core vulnerability classes, plus enterprise identity + infrastructure attack matrices.

Is Evidence Hygiene safe to install?

The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.

What can Evidence Hygiene access on my machine?

The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.

How current is this page?

The grade is for one exact copy of the source (c84f314844f2), read on 2026-10-10. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.

Advertisement