Cc StatusSAFE
⛔ No longer maintained → dev-agent-kit/recipes 让 Claude Code、Antigravity、Gemini CLI、Codex、Cursor 开箱即用的分层配置模板,总结十多年的日常开发经验
Overview
⛔ No longer maintained → dev-agent-kit/recipes 让 Claude Code、Antigravity、Gemini CLI、Codex、Cursor 开箱即用的分层配置模板,总结十多年的日常开发经验
f016c8907732OBSERVED · 2026-10-12Host compatibility
What the documentation claims. We have not run a compatibility test.
| Host | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| codex | mentioned |
What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
--- name: cc-status description: 结构化 Codex 配置与任务状态检查工作流,适用于显式 status、配置诊断、同步结果核对或任务盘点场景;聚焦 Codex 配置与项目内 .codex 任务状态。 --- # CC Status 当用户明确要求 status、查看 Codex 配置状态,或排查 sync 后的生效情况时,使用本技能。 不要用于: - Claude 或 Gemini 的状态诊断 - 正式 code review - 变更项目代码实现 ## 核心方式 1. 同时看项目内 `.codex/` 权威源和用户级 `~/.codex/`、`~/.agents/skills/` 部署产物。 2. 检查全局入口是否齐全:`AGENTS.md`、`rules/`、`instructions/`、`skills/`、`*.config.toml` profiles。 3. 检查 `AGENTS.md` 是否包含受管区块,`rules/`、`instructions/`、`skills/` 与 profiles 是否保留 manifest。 4. 检查 `codex` CLI 是否可用,并报告版本。 5. 若 `codex execpolicy check` 可用,抽样验证当前 rules 的 `allow/prompt/forbidden` 是否符合预期。 6. 补查当前项目是否具备 `new-feature` 任务持久化前置条件:项目内 `.codex/tasks/`、`.codex/tasks/archived/`、`.codex/templates/` 是否存在。 7. 补查 `.codex/tasks/` 根目录中的活动任务:当前主任务、候选任务、被打断点、最近更新时间,以及是否出现多个任务同时标成 `进行中` 的冲突。 8. 补查当前项目根目录 `AGENTS.md` 是否存在、是否包含 `AUTO:*` 自动区块,以及项目级上下文是否明显缺失。 9. 如果项目内与用户级数量不一致,优先判断是不是还没执行同步脚本。 10. 若项目内骨架齐全但仍无法持久化任务,优先判断是不是当前 Codex 会话的 sandbox / workspace scope 只覆盖了受限目录,而不是项目根目录本身可写。 11. 输出状态、缺口和下一步,不做泛泛而谈的环境描述。 ## 输出要求 - 明确区分“项目权威源”和“用户级生效配置” - 明确区分“文件已同步”与“规则已生效” - 明确区分“配置状态”与“任务状态” - 报告缺失项、数量差异、受管区块异常和明显异常 - 若当前项目缺少 `.codex/tasks/` 或 `.codex/templates/`,明确提示这会影响 `new-feature` 持久化,并建议先执行 `$project-init` 或 `$project-scan` - 若当前项目缺少根目录 `AGENTS.md`,或 `AGENTS.md` 明显缺少项目全貌/自动区块,明确建议执行 `$project-scan` - 若存在活动任务,报告当前主线、候选任务、阻塞或打断状态,以及建议先恢复哪一项 - 若发现多个任务同时处于 `进行中`,明确指出这是状态冲突,建议先用 `cc-task-state` 收敛 - 若检测不到问题,要直接说明状态正常 - 若怀疑未同步,明确建议执行 `tools/sync-config.sh` - 若骨架已齐全但任务写入仍失败,必须明确区分“项目根目录确实不可写”和“当前会话仍在受限 sandbox / workspace scope 中执行” ## 按需展开 - 检查项:`references/status-checks.md`
Trust audit
SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | NA |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (0)
No findings outside the package's declared scope.
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
f016c8907732full audit observations/trust-audit/skill/doccker__cc-status.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-12 | f016c8907732 | SAFE | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Cc Status skill do?
⛔ No longer maintained → dev-agent-kit/recipes 让 Claude Code、Antigravity、Gemini CLI、Codex、Cursor 开箱即用的分层配置模板,总结十多年的日常开发经验
Is Cc Status safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Cc Status access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
Which assistants does Cc Status work with?
Its documentation mentions codex. That is what the text claims, not a compatibility test we ran.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (f016c8907732), read on 2026-10-12. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.