Executing PlansSAFE
High-performance AI coding agent CLI written in Rust with zero unsafe code
Overview
High-performance AI coding agent CLI written in Rust with zero unsafe code
46a2537504c9OBSERVED · 2026-10-10What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
--- name: executing-plans description: Execute implementation plans in batches with review checkpoints version: 1.0.0 author: Ariff when_to_use: When a plan is ready to be implemented --- # Executing Plans ## Purpose Execute plans in controlled batches with verification gates. > "I'm using the Executing Plans skill to implement this plan." ## The Process ``` Load Plan → Review → Execute Batch → Report → Feedback → Next Batch ``` ### Step 1: Load & Review 1. Read the plan file 2. Review critically - identify concerns 3. If concerns → Raise with user before starting 4. Create TodoWrite for all tasks ### Step 2: Execute Batch **Default batch size: 3 tasks** For each task: 1. Mark as `in_progress` 2. Follow each step exactly 3. Run verifications as specified 4. Mark as `completed` ### Step 3: Report After each batch: ```markdown ## Batch Complete **Implemented:** - Task 1: [summary] - Task 2: [summary] - Task 3: [summary] **Verification:** \`\`\` [test output] \`\`\` Ready for feedback. ``` ### Step 4: Continue Based on feedback: - Apply changes if needed - Execute next batch - Repeat until complete ## When to STOP 🛑 **Stop immediately when:** - Hit a blocker (missing dependency, unclear instruction) - Test fails unexpectedly - Plan has gaps preventing progress - You don't understand something **Ask for clarification. Don't guess.** ## Verification Rules Before marking ANY task complete: 1. Run the verification command 2. Read the FULL output 3. Confirm it matches expectations 4. Only THEN mark complete No "should work" or "looks good" - actual verification output. ## Batch Reporting Format ```markdown ### Batch N Complete | Task | Status | Verification | |------|--------|--------------| | Task X | ✅ | 12/12 tests pass | | Task Y | ✅ | Build successful | | Task Z | ⚠️ | Needs review | **Next batch:** Tasks A, B, C Continue? ``` ## Completion After all tasks: 1. Run full test suite 2. Verify all requirements met 3. Report final status 4. Hand off to `finishing-branch` skill if applicable
Trust audit
SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | WARN |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | PASS |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (1)
.beads/beads.jsonl
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
46a2537504c9full audit observations/trust-audit/skill/dicklesworthstone__executing-plans.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-10 | 46a2537504c9 | SAFE | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Executing Plans skill do?
High-performance AI coding agent CLI written in Rust with zero unsafe code
Is Executing Plans safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Executing Plans access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (46a2537504c9), read on 2026-10-10. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.