Atlas / Skills / deanpeters / Finance Metrics Quickref

Finance Metrics QuickrefSAFE

skills/deanpeters/finance-metrics-quickref

Product Management skills framework built on battle-tested methods for Claude Code, Cowork, Codex, and AI agents.

Verdict
SAFE
Grade
B
Trust score
89 /100
Version
—
Hosts
—
License
NOASSERTION
Stars
7,184
01

Overview

Product Management skills framework built on battle-tested methods for Claude Code, Cowork, Codex, and AI agents.

Read from source at commit 0b657a54b6d7OBSERVED · 2026-10-07
02

What it tells the agent

The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.

---
name: finance-metrics-quickref
argument-hint: "[metric name]"
description: Look up SaaS finance metrics, formulas, and benchmarks fast. Use when you need a quick metric definition, formula, or benchmark during analysis.
intent: >-
  Quick reference for any SaaS finance metric without deep teaching. Use this when you need a fast formula lookup, benchmark check, or decision framework reminder. For detailed explanations, calculations, and examples, see the related deep-dive skills.
type: component
best_for:
  - "Quick metric lookups during product or finance reviews"
  - "Checking formulas and benchmarks without reading a long explainer"
  - "Refreshing decision rules for common SaaS metrics"
scenarios:
  - "What is the formula for NRR and what is a good benchmark?"
  - "Give me a quick reference for CAC payback and Rule of 40"
  - "I need a fast SaaS metrics cheat sheet for a business review"
theme: finance-metrics
estimated_time: "5-10 min"
---


## Purpose

Quick reference for any SaaS finance metric without deep teaching. Use this when you need a fast formula lookup, benchmark check, or decision framework reminder. For detailed explanations, calculations, and examples, see the related deep-dive skills.

This is not a teaching tool—it's a cheat sheet optimized for speed. Scan, find, apply.

## Input

**Works best with:** The metric you need — name it and get the formula, benchmark, and decision context.
**Also useful:** Your numbers, if you want the formula applied on the spot.

Anything supplied with the invocation itself — text after the skill name, a pasted context dump, or an appended `ARGUMENTS:` line — counts as answers already given. Use it and skip whatever it covers; don't re-ask.

**Arriving empty-handed? That works too.** Ask for the metric family you're working in (revenue, retention, efficiency, capital) and scan from there.

**Example invocation:** `Quick ref: burn multiple — formula, benchmark, and whether 1.7 is bad for Series B.`

## Key Concepts

### Metric Categories

Metrics are organized into four families:

1. **Revenue & Growth** — Top-line money (revenue, ARPU, ARPA, MRR/ARR, churn, NRR, expansion)
2. **Unit Economics** — Customer-level profitability (CAC, LTV, payback, margins)
3. **Capital Efficiency** — Cash management (burn rate, runway, OpEx, net income)
4. **Efficiency Ratios** — Growth vs. profitability balance (Rule of 40, magic number)

### When to Use This Skill

**Use this when:**
- You need a quick formula or benchmark
- You're preparing for a board meeting or investor call
- You're evaluating a decision and need to check which metrics matter
- You want to identify red flags quickly

**Don't use this when:**
- You need detailed calculation guidance (use `saas-revenue-growth-metrics` or `saas-economics-efficiency-metrics`)
- You're learning these metrics for the first time (start with deep-dive skills)
- You need examples and common pitfalls (covered in related skills)

---

## Application

### All Metrics Reference Table

| **Metric** | **Formula** | **What It Measures** | **Good Benchmark** | **Red Flag** |
|------------|-------------|----------------------|-------------------|--------------|
| **Revenue** | Total sales before expenses | Top-line money earned | Growth rate >20% YoY (varies by stage) | Revenue growing slower than costs |
| **ARPU** | Total Revenue / Total Users | Revenue per individual user | Varies by model; track trend | ARPU declining cohort-over-cohort |
| **ARPA** | MRR / Active Accounts | Revenue per customer account | SMB: $100-$1K; Mid: $1K-$10K; Ent: $10K+ | High ARPA + low ARPU (undermonetized seats) |
| **ACV** | Annual Recurring Revenue per Contract | Annualized contract value | SMB: $5K-$25K; Mid: $25K-$100K; Ent: $100K+ | ACV declining (moving downmarket unintentionally) |
| **MRR/ARR** | MRR × 12 = ARR | Predictable recurring revenue | Growth + quality matter; track components | New MRR declining while churn stable/growing |
| **Churn Rate** | Customers Lost / Starting Customers | % of customers who cancel | Monthly <2% great, <5% ok; Annual <10% great | Churn increasing cohort-over-cohort |
| **NRR** | (Start ARR + Expansion - Churn - Contraction) / Start ARR × 100 | Revenue retention + expansion | >120% excellent; 100-120% good; 90-100% ok | NRR <100% (base is contracting) |
| **Expansion Revenue** | Upsells + Cross-sells + Usage Growth | Additional revenue from existing customers | 20-30% of total revenue | Expansion <10% of MRR |
| **Quick Ratio** | (New MRR + Expansion MRR) / (Churned MRR + Contraction) | Revenue gains vs. losses | >4 excellent; 2-4 healthy; <2 leaky bucket | Quick Ratio <2 (leaky bucket) |
| **Gross Margin** | (Revenue - COGS) / Revenue × 100 | % of revenue after direct costs | SaaS: 70-85% good; <60% concerning | Gross margin <60% or declining |
| **CAC** | Total S&M Spend / New Customers | Cost to acquire one customer | Varies: Ent $10K+ ok; SMB <$500 | CAC increasing while LTV flat |
| **LTV** | ARPU × Gross Margin % / Churn Rate | Total revenue from one customer | Must be 3x+ CAC; varies by segment | LTV declining cohort-over-cohort |
| **LTV:CAC** | LTV / CAC | Unit economics efficiency | 3:1 healthy; <1:1 unsustainable; >5:1 underinvesting | LTV:CAC <1.5:1 |
| **Payback Period** | CAC / (Monthly ARPU × Gross Margin %) | Months to recover CAC | <12 months great; 12-18 ok; >24 concerning | Payback >24 months (cash trap) |
| **Contribution Margin** | (Revenue - All Variable Costs) / Revenue × 100 | True contribution after variable costs | 60-80% good for SaaS; <40% concerning | Contribution margin <40% |
| **Burn Rate** | Monthly Cash Spent - Revenue | Cash consumed per month | Net burn <$200K manageable early; <$500K growth | Net burn accelerating |
| **Runway** | Cash Balance / Monthly Net Burn | Months until money runs out | 12+ months good; 6-12 ok; <6 crisis | Runway <6 months |
| **OpEx** | S&M + R&D + G&A | Costs to run the business | Should grow slower than revenue | OpEx growing fas
03

Trust audit

SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.

LayerWhat it checksResult
L0Provenance & inventoryPASS
L1Static analysis of the codeNA
L2Instruction surface (what it tells the agent)PASS
L3Class-specific surfacePASS
L4Behavioural (sandbox)SKIPPED

What the source does

Filesystem
none-observed
Network
none-observed
Shell
none-observed
Dependencies
pinned
Secrets in source
none-found

Findings (0)

No findings outside the package's declared scope.

Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.

Audited 2026-10-07 · audit v0.4.1 · source sha 0b657a54b6d7full audit observations/trust-audit/skill/deanpeters__finance-metrics-quickref.json · Report an issue / request a re-scan
04

Audit history

Every audit this skill has had.

DateSourceVerdictGradeScoreChange
2026-10-070b657a54b6d7SAFEB89first audit
05

Questions

What does the Finance Metrics Quickref skill do?

Product Management skills framework built on battle-tested methods for Claude Code, Cowork, Codex, and AI agents.

Is Finance Metrics Quickref safe to install?

The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.

What can Finance Metrics Quickref access on my machine?

The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.

How current is this page?

The grade is for one exact copy of the source (0b657a54b6d7), read on 2026-10-07. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.

Advertisement