ReviewSAFE
A single hub to find Claude Skills, Agents, Commands, Hooks, Plugins, and Marketplace collections to extend Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Agent SDK and OpenClaw
Overview
A single hub to find Claude Skills, Agents, Commands, Hooks, Plugins, and Marketplace collections to extend Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Agent SDK and OpenClaw
80a0afd96301OBSERVED · 2026-10-07Host compatibility
What the documentation claims. We have not run a compatibility test.
| Host | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| codex | mentioned | |
| cursor | mentioned | |
| gemini-cli | mentioned |
What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
---
name: gsd:review
description: Request cross-AI peer review of phase plans from external AI CLIs
argument-hint: "--phase N [--gemini] [--claude] [--codex] [--opencode] [--qwen] [--cursor] [--all]"
allowed-tools:
- Read
- Write
- Bash
- Glob
- Grep
---
<objective>
Invoke external AI CLIs (Gemini, Claude, Codex, OpenCode, Qwen Code, Cursor) to independently review phase plans.
Produces a structured REVIEWS.md with per-reviewer feedback that can be fed back into
planning via /gsd:plan-phase --reviews.
**Flow:** Detect CLIs → Build review prompt → Invoke each CLI → Collect responses → Write REVIEWS.md
</objective>
<execution_context>
@${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/workflows/review.md
</execution_context>
<context>
Phase number: extracted from $ARGUMENTS (required)
**Flags:**
- `--gemini` — Include Gemini CLI review
- `--claude` — Include Claude CLI review (uses separate session)
- `--codex` — Include Codex CLI review
- `--opencode` — Include OpenCode review (uses model from user's OpenCode config)
- `--qwen` — Include Qwen Code review (Alibaba Qwen models)
- `--cursor` — Include Cursor agent review
- `--all` — Include all available CLIs
</context>
<process>
Execute the review workflow from @${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/workflows/review.md end-to-end.
</process>Trust audit
SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | NA |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (0)
No findings outside the package's declared scope.
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
80a0afd96301full audit observations/trust-audit/skill/davepoon__review.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-07 | 80a0afd96301 | SAFE | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Review skill do?
A single hub to find Claude Skills, Agents, Commands, Hooks, Plugins, and Marketplace collections to extend Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Agent SDK and OpenClaw
Is Review safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Review access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
Which assistants does Review work with?
Its documentation mentions codex, cursor and gemini-cli. That is what the text claims, not a compatibility test we ran.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (80a0afd96301), read on 2026-10-07. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.