Atlas / Skills / cyrusagents / F1 Test Drive

F1 Test DriveCAUTION

skills/cyrusagents/f1-test-drive

The Claude Code background agent for Linear, Slack, Github, GitLab etc. you deploy anywhere. Supports Codex, Cursor, Gemini, and Opencode harnesses too.

Verdict
CAUTION
Grade
B
Trust score
89 /100
Version
—
Hosts
1 documented
License
Apache-2.0
Stars
856
01

Overview

The Claude Code background agent for Linear, Slack, Github, GitLab etc. you deploy anywhere. Supports Codex, Cursor, Gemini, and Opencode harnesses too.

Read from source at commit a792ab0e17bbOBSERVED · 2026-10-13
02

Host compatibility

What the documentation claims. We have not run a compatibility test.

HostStatusNotes
codexmentioned
03

What it tells the agent

The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.

---
name: f1-test-drive
description: Assess F1 applicability, then validate changed product workflows or the F1 harness end-to-end. Skip drives and reports when no relevant workflow behavior changes.
---

# F1 Test Drive

## Applicability (required before setup)

This is the canonical F1 applicability policy. Inspect the actual diff against the
PR base and identify the behavior that needs validation before starting F1,
selecting a fixture, or creating a report. Task size, issue labels, filenames,
and a generic request to verify/ship are not sufficient reasons to run F1.

- **Required:** product/runtime changes exercised by F1 (issue tracking,
  authentication, routing, runner/session lifecycle, activity rendering), and
  functional changes to the F1 harness itself. Choose scenarios with assertions
  that exercise the changed behavior; a generic health check or unrelated
  fixture does not establish correctness.
- **Not applicable:** documentation, agent instructions, CI/release tooling,
  installer/build/packaging metadata, or other changes with no relevant product
  workflow behavior. Run appropriate documentation, script, unit, integration,
  build, package inspection, or isolated install smoke checks instead. Do not
  run F1 or create, attach, or commit an F1 test-drive report. A brief PR note
  stating why F1 is not applicable and what checks passed is enough.
- **Mixed changes:** exercise only the relevant functional portion with F1;
  validate other portions with their targeted checks. A docs, infrastructure,
  or metadata path is never an exemption for a real runtime behavior change
  (including dependencies, generated prompts, or installed defaults).
- **Actual releases:** assess the entire released payload against the previous
  release, not merely the version-bump PR. Runtime-bearing payloads retain
  relevant F1 validation. Payloads with no F1-covered behavior change use the
  non-F1 release verification described in `apps/cli/RELEASING.md`. Editing
  release tooling is not itself preparing or publishing a functional release.

If F1 is not applicable, stop this protocol before setup and reporting. If it
is applicable but blocked, report the missing coverage and blocker honestly;
do not relabel it as not applicable or substitute an unrelated passing drive.
Preserve historical reports.

| Actual change | Validation choice |
| --- | --- |
| PR #1502 artifact workflow and isolated installer tooling, without the separate agent-identity feature | Workflow/script tests, bundle integrity, isolated install and CLI smoke checks; no unrelated identity F1 fixture or report. |
| README wording or instruction-only policy such as CYPACK-1537 | Review consistency, links, and policy examples; no F1 report. Release-validator edits use proportionate verification; retain tests for consequential evidence-acceptance failures. |
| Runtime routing fix plus documentation | F1 scenario asserting changed routing; documentation checks for the rest. |
| EdgeWorker auth, routing, or session lifecycle | Relevant F1 scenarios asserting identity isolation, selected repository, or session continuation/termination as changed. |
| F1 RPC command, fixture execution, or activity renderer behavior | Exercise the changed harness path end-to-end and its unit/integration tests. Editing only F1 documentation still uses documentation checks. |
| Release PR changing only versions but shipping an unreleased session fix | Assess since the previous release; run relevant session F1 validation. |
| Release shipping only infrastructure/docs changes with no relevant workflow behavior | Record payload assessment and targeted checks as non-F1 release verification; no artificial F1 report. |

## Mission (when applicable)

Validate the changed workflow through the relevant issue-tracker, EdgeWorker,
and activity output paths. Name the scenario, expected behavior, and assertions
before setup. Use the phases below as building blocks; include only paths needed
for that scenario, plus setup and cleanup.

## Test Drive Protocol

### Phase 1: Setup

1. Create a fresh test repository (if needed):
   ```bash
   cd apps/f1
   ./f1 init-test-repo --path /tmp/f1-test-drive-<timestamp>
   ```

2. Start F1 server:
   ```bash
   CYRUS_PORT=3600 CYRUS_REPO_PATH=/tmp/f1-test-drive-<timestamp> bun run apps/f1/server.ts &
   ```

3. Verify server health:
   ```bash
   CYRUS_PORT=3600 ./f1 ping
   CYRUS_PORT=3600 ./f1 status
   ```

### Phase 2: Issue-Tracker Verification

1. Create test issue:
   ```bash
   CYRUS_PORT=3600 ./f1 create-issue \
     --title "<issue title>" \
     --description "<issue description>"
   ```

2. Verify issue ID and issue creation response.

### Phase 3: EdgeWorker Verification

1. Start agent session:
   ```bash
   CYRUS_PORT=3600 ./f1 start-session --issue-id <issue-id>
   ```

2. Monitor activities:
   ```bash
   CYRUS_PORT=3600 ./f1 view-session --session-id <session-id>
   ```

3. Verify:
   - session started
   - activities appear
   - agent is processing issue

### Phase 3.5: Slack Chat Session Verification (optional)

Use when validating the Slack → ChatSessionHandler → ClaudeRunner path. F1 exposes a test-only endpoint `/cli/dispatch-chat` that injects a synthetic `app_mention` event without going through Slack signature verification (`SlackChatAdapter` no-ops Slack API calls when `slackBotToken` is undefined).

1. Dispatch a synthetic chat event:
   ```bash
   CYRUS_PORT=3600 ./f1 start-chat-session \
     --channel C_TEST_CHAN \
     --user U_TEST_USER \
     --text "hello"
   ```
   The response contains a `threadKey` of the form `<channel>:<ts>`. Reuse the same `--thread-ts` to address the same chat thread on subsequent dispatches.

2. Verify shared auto-memory wiring:
   - The chat workspace exists at `<cyrusHome>/slack-workspaces/<sanitized-threadKey>/`.
   - The shared auto-memory directory exists (or is lazily creatable) at `<cyrusHome>/slack-memory/`.
   - The `claude_query_options` event emitted by `Cla
04

Trust audit

CAUTIONgrade B · trust 89/100 Install with care. The audit found things worth knowing before you trust its output.

LayerWhat it checksResult
L0Provenance & inventoryWARN
L1Static analysis of the codeNA
L2Instruction surface (what it tells the agent)PASS
L3Class-specific surfacePASS
L4Behavioural (sandbox)SKIPPED

What the source does

Filesystem
none-observed
Network
none-observed
Shell
none-observed
Dependencies
pinned
Secrets in source
none-found

Findings (5)

MEDIUMInventory / provenance · inv.symlink · CWE-1104
.claude/skills/cyrus-setup
.claude/skills/cyrus-setup
Why it matters. link not followed
MEDIUMInventory / provenance · inv.symlink · CWE-1104
.claude/skills/cyrus-setup-claude-auth
.claude/skills/cyrus-setup-claude-auth
Why it matters. link not followed
MEDIUMInventory / provenance · inv.symlink · CWE-1104
.claude/skills/cyrus-setup-endpoint
.claude/skills/cyrus-setup-endpoint
Why it matters. link not followed
MEDIUMInventory / provenance · inv.symlink · CWE-1104
.claude/skills/cyrus-setup-github
.claude/skills/cyrus-setup-github
Why it matters. link not followed
MEDIUMInventory / provenance · inv.symlink · CWE-1104
.claude/skills/cyrus-setup-gitlab
.claude/skills/cyrus-setup-gitlab
Why it matters. link not followed

Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.

Audited 2026-10-13 · audit v0.4.1 · source sha a792ab0e17bbfull audit observations/trust-audit/skill/cyrusagents__f1-test-drive.json · Report an issue / request a re-scan
05

Audit history

Every audit this skill has had.

DateSourceVerdictGradeScoreChange
2026-10-13a792ab0e17bbCAUTIONB89first audit
06

Questions

What does the F1 Test Drive skill do?

The Claude Code background agent for Linear, Slack, Github, GitLab etc. you deploy anywhere. Supports Codex, Cursor, Gemini, and Opencode harnesses too.

Is F1 Test Drive safe to install?

With care. The audit graded it B (89/100) and found 5 things worth knowing before you trust this skill, listed below with the exact line each was found on.

What can F1 Test Drive access on my machine?

The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.

Which assistants does F1 Test Drive work with?

Its documentation mentions codex. That is what the text claims, not a compatibility test we ran.

How current is this page?

The grade is for one exact copy of the source (a792ab0e17bb), read on 2026-10-13. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.

Advertisement