Weekly ReviewSAFE
Cursor plugin specification and official plugins
Overview
Cursor plugin specification and official plugins
890eaf6b2dddOBSERVED · 2026-10-12What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
--- name: weekly-review description: Produce a weekly synthesis of authored commits with highlights by bugfix, tech debt, and net-new work --- # Weekly review ## Trigger Need a weekly recap of shipped work for status updates, retros, or planning. ## Workflow 1. Determine the current git user email from repo config. 2. Collect authored commits from the last 7-10 days on the primary branch context. 3. Exclude merge commits. 4. Group meaningful changes into 2-5 concise bullets. 5. Add a short classification paragraph covering: - likely bug fixes - likely tech debt work - likely net-new functionality ## Guardrails - Keep the recap short and executive-readable. - Base claims only on commit history and diffs. - If git email is missing, ask the user to set it before proceeding. ## Output - 2-5 bullet weekly summary - Brief classification paragraph (bugfix / tech debt / net-new)
Trust audit
SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | NA |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (0)
No findings outside the package's declared scope.
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
890eaf6b2dddfull audit observations/trust-audit/skill/cursor__weekly-review.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-12 | 890eaf6b2ddd | SAFE | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Weekly Review skill do?
Cursor plugin specification and official plugins
Is Weekly Review safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Weekly Review access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (890eaf6b2ddd), read on 2026-10-12. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.