Review And ShipSAFE
Cursor plugin specification and official plugins
Overview
Cursor plugin specification and official plugins
890eaf6b2dddOBSERVED · 2026-10-12What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
--- name: review-and-ship description: Review the current branch for bugs, intent fit, and test coverage; run or write tests; commit focused work; open or update a PR. --- # Review and ship ## Trigger Reviewing changes before shipping. Close key issues, verify behavior, and open or update a PR. ## Workflow 1. Gather context: diff against base branch, uncommitted changes, recent commits, changed files, and user intent from recent relevant chats if useful. 2. Run targeted tests for changed behavior. If no focused tests exist, decide whether to add them or document the gap. 3. Review for correctness, regressions, security, and intent fit. Use parallel subagents for larger diffs. 4. Fix critical issues before finalizing and re-run affected tests. 5. Commit selective files with a concise message. 6. Push branch and open or update a PR. ## Suggested Checks ```bash git fetch origin main git diff origin/main...HEAD git status gh pr checks --json name,bucket,state,workflow,link ``` ## Guardrails - Prioritize correctness, security, and regressions over style-only comments. - Keep commits focused and avoid unrelated file changes. - If pre-commit checks fail, fix the issues rather than bypassing hooks. - Use `gh pr checks` instead of GitHub Actions-only commands when judging PR readiness. ## Output - Findings summary (critical, warning, note) - Tests run and outcomes - PR URL
Trust audit
SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | NA |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (0)
No findings outside the package's declared scope.
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
890eaf6b2dddfull audit observations/trust-audit/skill/cursor__review-and-ship.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-12 | 890eaf6b2ddd | SAFE | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Review And Ship skill do?
Cursor plugin specification and official plugins
Is Review And Ship safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Review And Ship access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (890eaf6b2ddd), read on 2026-10-12. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.