Rag Methodology GuideSAFE
🔬 A curated collection of 23,000+ agent skills for empirical research across 8 social science disciplines. | 精选 23,000+ AI Agent 技能库,覆盖8大社会科学学科的实证研究。CoPaper.AI 20分钟完成一篇可复现的规范实证论文,并支持用户上传 Skills。-- Maintained by CoPaper.AI from Stanford REAP.
Overview
🔬 A curated collection of 23,000+ agent skills for empirical research across 8 social science disciplines. | 精选 23,000+ AI Agent 技能库,覆盖8大社会科学学科的实证研究。CoPaper.AI 20分钟完成一篇可复现的规范实证论文,并支持用户上传 Skills。-- Maintained by CoPaper.AI from Stanford REAP.
e1ba289846fdOBSERVED · 2026-10-08Host compatibility
What the documentation claims. We have not run a compatibility test.
| Host | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| openclaw | mentioned |
What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
---
name: rag-methodology-guide
description: "RAG architecture for academic knowledge retrieval and synthesis"
metadata:
openclaw:
emoji: "🧠"
category: "tools"
subcategory: "knowledge-graph"
keywords: ["RAG", "retrieval augmented generation", "academic knowledge graph", "knowledge modeling"]
source: "wentor-research-plugins"
---
# RAG Methodology Guide
Design and implement Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems for academic research, including document chunking, embedding strategies, retrieval pipelines, and evaluation.
## What Is RAG?
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) augments a language model's generation with relevant information retrieved from an external knowledge base. For academic research, this enables:
- Question answering over a personal paper library
- Literature synthesis across hundreds of papers
- Fact-checking claims against source documents
- Generating citations with provenance
### RAG Pipeline Architecture
```
Query: "What are the main challenges of protein folding?"
|
v
[1. Query Processing]
|-- Embed query using embedding model
|-- Optional: Query expansion / HyDE
|
v
[2. Retrieval]
|-- Search vector database for top-k relevant chunks
|-- Optional: Reranking with cross-encoder
|
v
[3. Context Assembly]
|-- Combine retrieved chunks into a prompt
|-- Add metadata (source, page, citation)
|
v
[4. Generation]
|-- LLM generates answer grounded in retrieved context
|-- Include inline citations
|
v
Answer with citations
```
## Step 1: Document Ingestion and Chunking
### Chunking Strategies
| Strategy | Description | Best For |
|----------|-------------|----------|
| **Fixed-size** | Split every N characters/tokens | Simple, fast, baseline |
| **Sentence-based** | Split on sentence boundaries | Natural reading units |
| **Paragraph-based** | Split on paragraph breaks | Coherent semantic units |
| **Section-based** | Split on document headings | Academic papers |
| **Recursive** | Hierarchically split (heading > paragraph > sentence) | General purpose |
| **Semantic** | Split on topic shifts using embeddings | Best quality, slower |
### Implementation
```python
from langchain.text_splitter import RecursiveCharacterTextSplitter
def chunk_academic_paper(text, chunk_size=1000, chunk_overlap=200):
"""Chunk an academic paper using recursive splitting."""
splitter = RecursiveCharacterTextSplitter(
chunk_size=chunk_size,
chunk_overlap=chunk_overlap,
separators=[
"\n## ", # H2 headings (section breaks)
"\n### ", # H3 headings (subsection breaks)
"\n\n", # Paragraph breaks
"\n", # Line breaks
". ", # Sentence breaks
" ", # Word breaks
],
length_function=len
)
chunks = splitter.split_text(text)
return chunks
# Add metadata to each chunk
def create_documents(paper_text, metadata):
"""Create chunks with source metadata for citation tracking."""
chunks = chunk_academic_paper(paper_text)
documents = []
for i, chunk in enumerate(chunks):
documents.append({
"text": chunk,
"metadata": {
**metadata,
"chunk_index": i,
"chunk_total": len(chunks)
}
})
return documents
# Example usage
docs = create_documents(
paper_text=extracted_text,
metadata={
"title": "Attention Is All You Need",
"authors": "Vaswani et al.",
"year": 2017,
"doi": "10.48550/arXiv.1706.03762",
"source_file": "vaswani2017attention.pdf"
}
)
```
## Step 2: Embedding and Indexing
### Embedding Model Selection
| Model | Dimensions | Quality | Speed | Cost |
|-------|-----------|---------|-------|------|
| OpenAI text-embedding-3-small | 1536 | Good | Fast | $0.02/1M tokens |
| OpenAI text-embedding-3-large | 3072 | Excellent | Fast | $0.13/1M tokens |
| Cohere embed-v3 | 1024 | Excellent | Fast | $0.10/1M tokens |
| sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2 | 384 | Good | Very fast | Free (local) |
| BAAI/bge-large-en-v1.5 | 1024 | Excellent | Medium | Free (local) |
| nomic-embed-text | 768 | Good | Fast | Free (local) |
### Vector Database Options
| Database | Type | Scalability | Features |
|----------|------|------------|----------|
| ChromaDB | Embedded | Small-medium | Simple, good for prototyping |
| FAISS | Library | Large | Facebook research, GPU support |
| Pinecone | Cloud | Large | Managed, serverless |
| Weaviate | Self-hosted/Cloud | Large | Hybrid search, filters |
| Qdrant | Self-hosted/Cloud | Large | Rich filtering, payload storage |
| pgvector | PostgreSQL extension | Medium | SQL integration |
### Building the Index
```python
import chromadb
from sentence_transformers import SentenceTransformer
# Initialize embedding model (local, free)
embed_model = SentenceTransformer("BAAI/bge-large-en-v1.5")
# Initialize ChromaDB
client = chromadb.PersistentClient(path="./chroma_db")
collection = client.get_or_create_collection(
name="research_papers",
metadata={"hnsw:space": "cosine"}
)
# Index documents
def index_documents(documents):
"""Add documents to the vector database."""
texts = [doc["text"] for doc in documents]
embeddings = embed_model.encode(texts, show_progress_bar=True).tolist()
ids = [f"doc_{i}" for i in range(len(documents))]
metadatas = [doc["metadata"] for doc in documents]
collection.add(
documents=texts,
embeddings=embeddings,
metadatas=metadatas,
ids=ids
)
print(f"Indexed {len(documents)} chunks")
index_documents(docs)
```
## Step 3: Retrieval
### Basic Retrieval
```python
def retrieve(query, top_k=5):
"""Retrieve the most relevant chunks for a query."""
query_embedding = embed_model.encode([query]).tolist()
results = collection.query(
query_embeddings=queryTrust audit
SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | NA |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (0)
No findings outside the package's declared scope.
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
e1ba289846fdfull audit observations/trust-audit/skill/brycewang-stanford__rag-methodology-guide.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-08 | e1ba289846fd | SAFE | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Rag Methodology Guide skill do?
🔬 A curated collection of 23,000+ agent skills for empirical research across 8 social science disciplines. | 精选 23,000+ AI Agent 技能库,覆盖8大社会科学学科的实证研究。CoPaper.AI 20分钟完成一篇可复现的规范实证论文,并支持用户上传 Skills。-- Maintained by CoPaper.AI from Stanford REAP.
Is Rag Methodology Guide safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Rag Methodology Guide access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
Which assistants does Rag Methodology Guide work with?
Its documentation mentions openclaw. That is what the text claims, not a compatibility test we ran.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (e1ba289846fd), read on 2026-10-08. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.