Papers We Love GuideSAFE
🔬 A curated collection of 23,000+ agent skills for empirical research across 8 social science disciplines. | 精选 23,000+ AI Agent 技能库,覆盖8大社会科学学科的实证研究。CoPaper.AI 20分钟完成一篇可复现的规范实证论文,并支持用户上传 Skills。-- Maintained by CoPaper.AI from Stanford REAP.
Overview
🔬 A curated collection of 23,000+ agent skills for empirical research across 8 social science disciplines. | 精选 23,000+ AI Agent 技能库,覆盖8大社会科学学科的实证研究。CoPaper.AI 20分钟完成一篇可复现的规范实证论文,并支持用户上传 Skills。-- Maintained by CoPaper.AI from Stanford REAP.
e1ba289846fdOBSERVED · 2026-10-08Install
Commands as the repository documents them. They are shown, not run.
git clone https://github.com/papers-we-love/papers-we-love.git
Host compatibility
What the documentation claims. We have not run a compatibility test.
| Host | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| openclaw | mentioned |
What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
---
name: papers-we-love-guide
description: "Community-curated directory of influential CS research papers"
metadata:
openclaw:
emoji: "❤️"
category: "literature"
subcategory: "discovery"
keywords: ["papers we love", "CS papers", "reading groups", "classic papers", "paper recommendations", "curated list"]
source: "https://github.com/papers-we-love/papers-we-love"
---
# Papers We Love Guide
## Overview
Papers We Love (PWL) is a community-driven repository of influential computer science research papers organized by topic, with worldwide reading groups. The repository contains direct links to PDFs and summaries for hundreds of landmark papers across distributed systems, programming languages, machine learning, security, and more. A go-to resource for discovering foundational and impactful research.
## Repository Structure
```
papers-we-love/
├── distributed_systems/
│ ├── README.md # Curated list with descriptions
│ ├── lamport-clocks.pdf
│ └── raft.pdf
├── machine_learning/
├── programming_languages/
├── security/
├── databases/
├── networking/
├── information_retrieval/
├── artificial_intelligence/
├── concurrency/
├── operating_systems/
└── ... (40+ categories)
```
## Topic Categories
| Category | Notable Papers |
|----------|---------------|
| **Distributed Systems** | Paxos, Raft, MapReduce, Dynamo |
| **Machine Learning** | Backpropagation, Dropout, Attention, BatchNorm |
| **Programming Languages** | Lambda calculus, Type inference, Hindley-Milner |
| **Databases** | B-Trees, LSM-Trees, MVCC, Column stores |
| **Security** | Public-key crypto, Zero-knowledge proofs, TLS |
| **Networking** | TCP congestion, BGP, Software-defined networking |
| **Operating Systems** | Unix, Microkernel debate, Virtual memory |
| **Concurrency** | CSP, Actor model, Software transactional memory |
## Using PWL for Research
### Finding Papers by Topic
```bash
# Clone the repository
git clone https://github.com/papers-we-love/papers-we-love.git
# Browse categories
ls papers-we-love/
# Each directory has a README with curated descriptions
cat papers-we-love/distributed_systems/README.md
```
### Programmatic Access
```python
import os
import glob
PWL_PATH = "./papers-we-love"
# List all categories
categories = [d for d in os.listdir(PWL_PATH)
if os.path.isdir(os.path.join(PWL_PATH, d))
and not d.startswith('.')]
print(f"Categories: {len(categories)}")
# Find papers in a category
ml_papers = glob.glob(f"{PWL_PATH}/machine_learning/*.pdf")
for p in ml_papers:
print(f" {os.path.basename(p)}")
# Search across all READMEs for a topic
import re
for readme in glob.glob(f"{PWL_PATH}/*/README.md"):
with open(readme) as f:
content = f.read()
if re.search(r"consensus|paxos|raft", content, re.I):
category = os.path.basename(os.path.dirname(readme))
print(f"Found in: {category}")
```
## Reading Group Integration
```python
# PWL chapters host monthly meetups worldwide
# Find local chapters at paperswelove.org
chapters = {
"New York": "meetup.com/papers-we-love",
"San Francisco": "meetup.com/papers-we-love-too",
"London": "meetup.com/papers-we-love-london",
"Berlin": "meetup.com/papers-we-love-berlin",
# 40+ chapters globally
}
# Video talks on YouTube
# youtube.com/@PapersWeLove — recorded presentations
# Each talk: 30-60 min paper walkthrough by practitioner
```
## Building a Reading List
```python
# Curate a personal reading list from PWL
essential_distributed = [
"Time, Clocks, and the Ordering of Events (Lamport, 1978)",
"The Byzantine Generals Problem (Lamport et al., 1982)",
"Impossibility of Distributed Consensus (FLP, 1985)",
"Paxos Made Simple (Lamport, 2001)",
"In Search of an Understandable Consensus Algorithm (Raft, 2014)",
"Dynamo: Amazon's Key-Value Store (DeCandia et al., 2007)",
"MapReduce: Simplified Data Processing (Dean & Ghemawat, 2004)",
]
essential_ml = [
"A Few Useful Things to Know About ML (Domingos, 2012)",
"Dropout: A Simple Way to Prevent Overfitting (Srivastava, 2014)",
"Batch Normalization (Ioffe & Szegedy, 2015)",
"Attention Is All You Need (Vaswani et al., 2017)",
"BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers (2018)",
]
```
## Contributing to PWL
```markdown
## How to Contribute
1. Fork the repository
2. Add paper PDF to appropriate category directory
3. Update the category README.md with:
- Paper title and authors
- Year of publication
- Brief description (2-3 sentences)
- Why it matters
4. Submit a pull request
### README Entry Format
- :scroll: [Paper Title](link) — Brief description.
Authors (Year). *Venue*.
```
## Use Cases
1. **Literature exploration**: Discover landmark papers by topic
2. **Reading groups**: Structured paper discussions with community
3. **Course preparation**: Curate reading lists for CS courses
4. **Onboarding**: Get up to speed on a new research area
5. **Historical context**: Trace the evolution of CS ideas
## References
- [Papers We Love GitHub](https://github.com/papers-we-love/papers-we-love)
- [Papers We Love Website](https://paperswelove.org/)
- [PWL YouTube Channel](https://www.youtube.com/@PapersWeLove)Trust audit
SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | NA |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (0)
No findings outside the package's declared scope.
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
e1ba289846fdfull audit observations/trust-audit/skill/brycewang-stanford__papers-we-love-guide.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-08 | e1ba289846fd | SAFE | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Papers We Love Guide skill do?
🔬 A curated collection of 23,000+ agent skills for empirical research across 8 social science disciplines. | 精选 23,000+ AI Agent 技能库,覆盖8大社会科学学科的实证研究。CoPaper.AI 20分钟完成一篇可复现的规范实证论文,并支持用户上传 Skills。-- Maintained by CoPaper.AI from Stanford REAP.
Is Papers We Love Guide safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Papers We Love Guide access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
Which assistants does Papers We Love Guide work with?
Its documentation mentions openclaw. That is what the text claims, not a compatibility test we ran.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (e1ba289846fd), read on 2026-10-08. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.