Open Researcher GuideSAFE
🔬 A curated collection of 23,000+ agent skills for empirical research across 8 social science disciplines. | 精选 23,000+ AI Agent 技能库,覆盖8大社会科学学科的实证研究。CoPaper.AI 20分钟完成一篇可复现的规范实证论文,并支持用户上传 Skills。-- Maintained by CoPaper.AI from Stanford REAP.
Overview
🔬 A curated collection of 23,000+ agent skills for empirical research across 8 social science disciplines. | 精选 23,000+ AI Agent 技能库,覆盖8大社会科学学科的实证研究。CoPaper.AI 20分钟完成一篇可复现的规范实证论文,并支持用户上传 Skills。-- Maintained by CoPaper.AI from Stanford REAP.
e1ba289846fdOBSERVED · 2026-10-08Host compatibility
What the documentation claims. We have not run a compatibility test.
| Host | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| openclaw | mentioned |
What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
---
name: open-researcher-guide
description: "Open pipeline for generating deep research trajectories with LLMs"
metadata:
openclaw:
emoji: "🔬"
category: "research"
subcategory: "deep-research"
keywords: ["OpenResearcher", "deep research", "research trajectory", "open pipeline", "literature synthesis", "LLM research"]
source: "https://github.com/GAIR-NLP/OpenResearcher"
---
# OpenResearcher Guide
## Overview
OpenResearcher is a fully open pipeline for long-horizon deep research trajectory synthesis. It breaks complex research questions into sub-questions, iteratively searches and reads literature, builds internal knowledge representations, and synthesizes comprehensive answers. Unlike single-shot approaches, it models the researcher's thought process — reading, questioning, connecting, and refining understanding over multiple rounds.
## Pipeline Stages
### 1. Question Decomposition
```python
from open_researcher import OpenResearcher
researcher = OpenResearcher(llm_provider="anthropic")
# Complex research question
result = researcher.research(
"How do retrieval-augmented generation systems handle "
"knowledge conflicts between parametric and retrieved knowledge, "
"and what are the current mitigation strategies?"
)
# Automatically decomposes into sub-questions:
# SQ1: What types of knowledge conflicts occur in RAG?
# SQ2: How are conflicts detected?
# SQ3: What resolution strategies exist?
# SQ4: How effective are these strategies?
```
### 2. Iterative Search and Reading
```python
# Each sub-question triggers:
# - Academic search (OpenAlex, arXiv)
# - Paper reading (abstract + key sections)
# - Evidence extraction
# - Follow-up question generation
# Configuration
researcher = OpenResearcher(
search_backends=["openalex", "arxiv"],
max_iterations=5, # Research rounds per sub-question
papers_per_iteration=10, # Papers to read per round
follow_up_questions=True, # Generate follow-up questions
)
```
### 3. Knowledge Graph Building
```python
# Internally builds a knowledge representation:
# - Claims linked to source papers
# - Relationships between concepts
# - Contradictions flagged
# Access the knowledge graph
kg = result.knowledge_graph
print(f"Concepts: {len(kg.nodes)}")
print(f"Relations: {len(kg.edges)}")
print(f"Contradictions: {len(kg.contradictions)}")
```
### 4. Synthesis and Report
```python
# Multi-section synthesis
report = result.report
# Sections:
# 1. Introduction and scope
# 2. Sub-question answers with evidence
# 3. Cross-cutting themes
# 4. Open questions and future directions
# 5. Full bibliography
report.save("research_report.md")
report.export_bibliography("refs.bib")
```
## Configuration
```python
researcher = OpenResearcher(
llm_provider="anthropic",
model="claude-sonnet-4-20250514",
search_config={
"backends": ["openalex", "arxiv"],
"max_results_per_query": 20,
},
reading_config={
"sections": ["abstract", "introduction", "methods", "conclusion"],
"max_tokens_per_paper": 3000,
},
synthesis_config={
"style": "academic", # academic, technical, accessible
"include_contradictions": True,
"cite_inline": True,
},
)
```
## Trajectory Inspection
```python
# Inspect the research trajectory
trajectory = result.trajectory
for step in trajectory:
print(f"Round {step.round}: {step.action}")
print(f" Query: {step.query}")
print(f" Papers read: {step.papers_read}")
print(f" Key findings: {step.findings[:100]}...")
print(f" Follow-ups: {step.follow_up_questions}")
```
## Use Cases
1. **Literature surveys**: Comprehensive multi-round research
2. **Research proposals**: Evidence gathering for grant applications
3. **State-of-the-art reports**: Current landscape analysis
4. **Tutorial generation**: Deep topic explanations with citations
## References
- [OpenResearcher GitHub](https://github.com/GAIR-NLP/OpenResearcher)
- [GAIR-NLP Lab](https://github.com/GAIR-NLP)Trust audit
SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | NA |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (0)
No findings outside the package's declared scope.
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
e1ba289846fdfull audit observations/trust-audit/skill/brycewang-stanford__open-researcher-guide.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-08 | e1ba289846fd | SAFE | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Open Researcher Guide skill do?
🔬 A curated collection of 23,000+ agent skills for empirical research across 8 social science disciplines. | 精选 23,000+ AI Agent 技能库,覆盖8大社会科学学科的实证研究。CoPaper.AI 20分钟完成一篇可复现的规范实证论文,并支持用户上传 Skills。-- Maintained by CoPaper.AI from Stanford REAP.
Is Open Researcher Guide safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Open Researcher Guide access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
Which assistants does Open Researcher Guide work with?
Its documentation mentions openclaw. That is what the text claims, not a compatibility test we ran.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (e1ba289846fd), read on 2026-10-08. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.