Mixed Methods GuideSAFE

🔬 A curated collection of 23,000+ agent skills for empirical research across 8 social science disciplines. | 精选 23,000+ AI Agent 技能库,覆盖8大社会科学学科的实证研究。CoPaper.AI 20分钟完成一篇可复现的规范实证论文,并支持用户上传 Skills。-- Maintained by CoPaper.AI from Stanford REAP.

The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.

---
name: mixed-methods-guide
description: "Guide to designing and conducting mixed methods research"
metadata:
  openclaw:
    emoji: "🔀"
    category: "research"
    subcategory: "methodology"
    keywords: ["mixed methods research", "multimethod design", "quantitative research design"]
    source: "wentor-research-plugins"
---

# Mixed Methods Research Guide

Design, execute, and report mixed methods research that integrates quantitative and qualitative approaches for more comprehensive and rigorous findings.

## What Is Mixed Methods Research?

Mixed methods research (MMR) systematically combines quantitative and qualitative data collection, analysis, and interpretation within a single study or program of inquiry. It goes beyond simply using both numbers and words; the core requirement is purposeful integration of the two strands.

### When to Use Mixed Methods

| Situation | Why MMR Helps |
|-----------|--------------|
| Quantitative results need explanation | Qualitative follow-up explains why and how |
| Need to develop an instrument | Qualitative exploration informs survey items |
| Testing a new intervention | Quantitative outcomes + qualitative experience |
| Complex phenomena | Neither approach alone captures the full picture |
| Conflicting prior findings | Triangulation resolves discrepancies |
| Studying under-researched topics | Exploration (qual) then confirmation (quant) |

## Major Mixed Methods Designs

### Convergent Design (Concurrent)

Both strands are collected simultaneously, analyzed separately, then merged.

```
    QUAN data collection          QUAL data collection
           |                              |
    QUAN data analysis            QUAL data analysis
           |                              |
           +---------- Merge ------------+
                         |
                  Interpretation
```

**Use when**: You want to compare, validate, or triangulate quantitative and qualitative findings on the same phenomenon.

**Example**: Survey 500 teachers on burnout (QUAN) while simultaneously interviewing 20 teachers about their experiences (QUAL). Merge findings to see if themes align with statistical patterns.

### Explanatory Sequential Design

Quantitative phase first, followed by qualitative phase to explain or elaborate on quantitative results.

```
    QUAN data collection & analysis
                |
    Identify results needing explanation
                |
    QUAL data collection & analysis (informed by QUAN results)
                |
           Interpretation
```

**Use when**: You have surprising, confusing, or significant quantitative results that need deeper understanding.

**Example**: Find that 30% of participants show an unexpected improvement pattern. Interview those participants to understand what drove their experience.

### Exploratory Sequential Design

Qualitative phase first to explore, followed by quantitative phase to test or generalize.

```
    QUAL data collection & analysis
                |
    Develop instrument / hypotheses / categories from QUAL findings
                |
    QUAN data collection & analysis (testing QUAL-derived constructs)
                |
           Interpretation
```

**Use when**: You are studying something new and need qualitative exploration to develop measurement instruments or hypotheses.

**Example**: Interview 25 researchers about AI tool adoption (QUAL). Use themes to develop a survey instrument. Administer survey to 400 researchers (QUAN).

### Embedded Design

One strand is embedded within the other, serving a supplementary role.

```
    QUAN experiment
        |-- Embedded QUAL (interviews during intervention)
        |-- QUAN outcome measures
           |
       Interpretation
```

## Integration Strategies

Integration is what distinguishes mixed methods from simply running two separate studies. Key integration strategies:

| Strategy | Description | When in Study |
|----------|-------------|--------------|
| **Merging** | Bring QUAN + QUAL results together for comparison | Analysis/interpretation |
| **Connecting** | One strand's results inform the next strand's design | Between phases |
| **Building** | QUAL results build a QUAN instrument (or vice versa) | Between phases |
| **Embedding** | One strand is nested within the other's framework | Data collection |

### Joint Display Table

A joint display is a table or visualization that explicitly integrates both data types:

```
| Quantitative Finding | Qualitative Theme | Meta-Inference |
|---------------------|-------------------|----------------|
| 78% reported high stress (M=4.2/5) | Theme: "Always-on culture" — participants described checking email at midnight | Convergent: high stress scores align with descriptions of boundary erosion |
| No significant gender difference (p=.34) | Women described unique stressors (caregiving + work), men described different ones (promotion pressure) | Divergent: similar overall levels but different sources of stress |
| Time-management training reduced stress (d=0.45) | Theme: "Tools help but culture doesn't change" | Complementary: training has modest measurable effect but underlying issues persist |
```

## Sample Size Considerations

| Strand | Typical Range | Rationale |
|--------|---------------|-----------|
| Quantitative (survey) | 100-1000+ | Power analysis, see power-analysis-guide |
| Qualitative (interviews) | 12-30 | Saturation (no new themes emerging) |
| Qualitative (focus groups) | 3-6 groups of 6-10 | Diversity of perspectives |
| Qualitative (case study) | 3-10 cases | In-depth understanding |

**For convergent designs**: The QUAN sample is typically much larger than the QUAL sample. This is acceptable because the two strands serve different purposes (generalizability vs. depth).

## Data Analysis

### Quantitative Analysis

Standard statistical methods apply: descriptive statistics, t-tests, ANOVA, regression, SEM, etc. See the relevant analysis skill guides.

### Qualitative A

SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.

What the source does

Filesystem

none-observed

Network

none-observed

Shell

none-observed

Dependencies

pinned

Secrets in source

none-found

Findings (0)

No findings outside the package's declared scope.

Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.