Lean Theorem Proving GuideSAFE
🔬 A curated collection of 23,000+ agent skills for empirical research across 8 social science disciplines. | 精选 23,000+ AI Agent 技能库,覆盖8大社会科学学科的实证研究。CoPaper.AI 20分钟完成一篇可复现的规范实证论文,并支持用户上传 Skills。-- Maintained by CoPaper.AI from Stanford REAP.
Overview
🔬 A curated collection of 23,000+ agent skills for empirical research across 8 social science disciplines. | 精选 23,000+ AI Agent 技能库,覆盖8大社会科学学科的实证研究。CoPaper.AI 20分钟完成一篇可复现的规范实证论文,并支持用户上传 Skills。-- Maintained by CoPaper.AI from Stanford REAP.
e1ba289846fdOBSERVED · 2026-10-08Host compatibility
What the documentation claims. We have not run a compatibility test.
| Host | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| openclaw | mentioned |
What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
---
name: lean-theorem-proving-guide
description: "LLM agent for formal theorem proving in Lean 4"
metadata:
openclaw:
emoji: "📐"
category: "domains"
subcategory: "math"
keywords: ["Lean 4", "theorem proving", "formal verification", "LLM math", "proof assistant", "LeanAgent"]
source: "https://github.com/lean-dojo/LeanAgent"
---
# Lean Theorem Proving Agent Guide
## Overview
LeanAgent is an LLM-based agent for automated theorem proving in Lean 4, a modern proof assistant. It combines LLM reasoning with formal verification — proposing proof steps that are verified by Lean's type checker. Can prove novel theorems, not just benchmarks, by exploring proof strategies, backtracking on failures, and learning from successful proofs.
## Architecture
```
Theorem Statement (Lean 4)
↓
Goal Analysis Agent (understand proof obligations)
↓
Tactic Suggestion Agent (propose proof steps)
↓
Lean 4 Verification (check tactic correctness)
↓
Backtracking (if tactic fails, try alternatives)
↓
Proof or timeout
```
## Usage
```python
from lean_agent import LeanAgent
agent = LeanAgent(
llm_provider="anthropic",
lean_path="/path/to/lean4",
)
# Prove a theorem
result = agent.prove(
theorem="""
theorem add_comm (m n : Nat) : m + n = n + m := by
sorry
""",
max_attempts=50,
timeout=120,
)
if result.proved:
print("Proof found!")
print(result.proof)
else:
print(f"Failed. Best attempt:\n{result.best_attempt}")
print(f"Remaining goals: {result.remaining_goals}")
```
## Proof Search Strategies
```python
# Configure search strategy
agent = LeanAgent(
search_config={
"strategy": "best_first", # best_first, bfs, dfs
"max_depth": 20, # Max proof steps
"beam_width": 5, # Tactics to try per step
"temperature": 0.7, # LLM sampling temp
"backtrack_on_fail": True,
},
)
# Interactive proof mode
session = agent.interactive_prove(
theorem="theorem my_thm : ∀ n : Nat, n + 0 = n := by"
)
while not session.done:
print(f"Current goals:\n{session.goals}")
tactics = session.suggest_tactics(k=5)
for i, t in enumerate(tactics):
print(f" {i}: {t.tactic} (confidence: {t.score:.2f})")
# Agent automatically picks best tactic
session.step()
```
## Lean 4 Tactic Library
```lean
-- Common tactics LeanAgent uses:
-- intro, apply, exact, rfl, simp, omega
-- induction, cases, constructor, ext
-- rw, calc, have, let, show
-- Example theorem + proof
theorem list_append_nil (l : List α) : l ++ [] = l := by
induction l with
| nil => simp
| cons h t ih => simp [ih]
```
## Batch Proving
```python
# Prove multiple theorems
theorems = [
"theorem t1 : 1 + 1 = 2 := by sorry",
"theorem t2 (n : Nat) : n + 0 = n := by sorry",
"theorem t3 (n m : Nat) : n + m = m + n := by sorry",
]
results = agent.prove_batch(
theorems=theorems,
parallel=True,
timeout_per=60,
)
for thm, result in zip(theorems, results):
status = "PROVED" if result.proved else "FAILED"
print(f"[{status}] {thm[:50]}...")
```
## Use Cases
1. **Automated proving**: Prove mathematical theorems formally
2. **Proof assistance**: Suggest tactics during manual proving
3. **Verification**: Formally verify mathematical claims
4. **Education**: Learn Lean 4 tactics with AI guidance
5. **Research**: Explore new proof techniques
## References
- [LeanAgent GitHub](https://github.com/lean-dojo/LeanAgent)
- [Lean 4](https://lean-lang.org/)
- [Mathlib4](https://leanprover-community.github.io/mathlib4_docs/)
- [LeanDojo](https://leandojo.org/)Trust audit
SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | NA |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (0)
No findings outside the package's declared scope.
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
e1ba289846fdfull audit observations/trust-audit/skill/brycewang-stanford__lean-theorem-proving-guide.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-08 | e1ba289846fd | SAFE | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Lean Theorem Proving Guide skill do?
🔬 A curated collection of 23,000+ agent skills for empirical research across 8 social science disciplines. | 精选 23,000+ AI Agent 技能库,覆盖8大社会科学学科的实证研究。CoPaper.AI 20分钟完成一篇可复现的规范实证论文,并支持用户上传 Skills。-- Maintained by CoPaper.AI from Stanford REAP.
Is Lean Theorem Proving Guide safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Lean Theorem Proving Guide access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
Which assistants does Lean Theorem Proving Guide work with?
Its documentation mentions openclaw. That is what the text claims, not a compatibility test we ran.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (e1ba289846fd), read on 2026-10-08. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.