Introduction Writing GuideSAFE
🔬 A curated collection of 23,000+ agent skills for empirical research across 8 social science disciplines. | 精选 23,000+ AI Agent 技能库,覆盖8大社会科学学科的实证研究。CoPaper.AI 20分钟完成一篇可复现的规范实证论文,并支持用户上传 Skills。-- Maintained by CoPaper.AI from Stanford REAP.
Overview
🔬 A curated collection of 23,000+ agent skills for empirical research across 8 social science disciplines. | 精选 23,000+ AI Agent 技能库,覆盖8大社会科学学科的实证研究。CoPaper.AI 20分钟完成一篇可复现的规范实证论文,并支持用户上传 Skills。-- Maintained by CoPaper.AI from Stanford REAP.
e1ba289846fdOBSERVED · 2026-10-08Host compatibility
What the documentation claims. We have not run a compatibility test.
| Host | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| openclaw | mentioned |
What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
---
name: introduction-writing-guide
description: "Guide to writing effective research paper introductions"
metadata:
openclaw:
emoji: "🖊️"
category: "writing"
subcategory: "composition"
keywords: ["introduction writing", "research background", "literature gap"]
source: "wentor-research-plugins"
---
# Introduction Writing Guide
Write compelling research paper introductions using the CARS (Create A Research Space) model with structured approaches for establishing context, identifying gaps, and motivating your study.
## The CARS Model
John Swales' Create A Research Space (CARS) model is the most widely used framework for structuring academic introductions. It consists of three rhetorical "moves":
| Move | Purpose | Typical Length |
|------|---------|---------------|
| **Move 1**: Establishing a territory | Show the research area is important and active | 2-4 paragraphs |
| **Move 2**: Establishing a niche | Identify a gap, question, or problem | 1-2 paragraphs |
| **Move 3**: Occupying the niche | State what your paper does to address the gap | 1-2 paragraphs |
## Move 1: Establishing a Territory
### Strategy 1A: Claiming Centrality
Signal that the topic is important, interesting, or well-established:
```
Pattern phrases:
- "X has attracted considerable attention in recent years..."
- "The role of X in Y is well established..."
- "X is a fundamental aspect of..."
- "Understanding X is critical for..."
- "Recent advances in X have transformed..."
```
### Strategy 1B: Making Topic Generalizations
Summarize the current state of knowledge:
```
Pattern phrases:
- "Previous studies have demonstrated that..."
- "It is widely accepted that X leads to Y..."
- "Several approaches have been proposed to address X, including..."
- "Research in this area has traditionally focused on..."
```
### Strategy 1C: Reviewing Previous Research
Cite specific studies to build the scholarly context:
```
Example paragraph:
"Smith et al. (2020) demonstrated that X improves Y by 30%.
Building on this finding, Jones (2021) extended the approach to Z domain,
reporting similar gains. Meanwhile, Chen and Lee (2022) proposed an
alternative framework that addresses the scalability limitations of
earlier methods."
```
**Tips for Move 1:**
- Funnel from broad to narrow: start with the general field, then narrow to your specific topic
- Cite 10-20 papers across Move 1 (varies by field)
- Balance classic/foundational references with recent work
- Use present tense for established knowledge, past tense for specific findings
## Move 2: Establishing a Niche
This is the most critical move. You must convince the reader that there is a problem worth solving.
### Strategy 2A: Counter-Claiming (Challenging Previous Work)
```
Pattern phrases:
- "However, these approaches suffer from..."
- "Despite these advances, X remains poorly understood..."
- "A major limitation of existing methods is..."
- "These findings have been contradicted by..."
```
### Strategy 2B: Indicating a Gap
```
Pattern phrases:
- "To date, no study has examined..."
- "Little attention has been paid to..."
- "The relationship between X and Y has not been explored..."
- "A comprehensive analysis of X is still lacking..."
```
### Strategy 2C: Raising a Question
```
Pattern phrases:
- "An open question is whether X can be applied to..."
- "It remains unclear how X affects Y under conditions Z..."
- "This raises the question of..."
```
### Strategy 2D: Continuing a Tradition
```
Pattern phrases:
- "Following the approach of Smith (2020), we extend..."
- "Building on recent advances in X, this paper..."
```
**Tips for Move 2:**
- The gap must be clearly linked to the context established in Move 1
- Do not criticize previous work too harshly; use hedging language
- The gap must be specific enough that your paper can plausibly fill it
## Move 3: Occupying the Niche
### Strategy 3A: Outlining Purposes
```
Pattern phrases:
- "In this paper, we propose..."
- "The present study aims to..."
- "This work introduces a novel approach to..."
- "We address this gap by..."
```
### Strategy 3B: Announcing Principal Findings
```
Pattern phrases:
- "Our results demonstrate that..."
- "We show that X outperforms Y by Z%..."
- "The key finding is that..."
```
### Strategy 3C: Indicating Article Structure
```
Example:
"The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. Section 2
reviews related work. Section 3 describes our methodology. Section 4
presents experimental results. Section 5 discusses implications and
limitations. Section 6 concludes."
```
## Complete Introduction Template
```markdown
[Move 1A: Centrality claim - 1-2 sentences]
[Topic] is a critical challenge in [field], with applications
in [area 1], [area 2], and [area 3].
[Move 1B-1C: Background and review - 2-3 paragraphs]
Previous work has established that [known fact]. Smith et al. (2020)
showed [finding 1]. Jones (2021) extended this to [finding 2].
More recently, Chen (2022) demonstrated [finding 3].
[Move 2: Gap identification - 1 paragraph]
However, existing approaches have several limitations. First, [limitation 1].
Second, [limitation 2]. To date, no work has addressed [specific gap].
[Move 3A: Purpose statement - 1-2 sentences]
In this paper, we propose [method/framework] to address [gap].
Our approach differs from prior work in [key difference].
[Move 3B: Key findings - 1-2 sentences]
Our experiments on [benchmark] demonstrate that [main result],
achieving [quantitative improvement] over the state of the art.
[Move 3C: Structure outline - optional, 1-2 sentences]
The rest of this paper is organized as follows...
```
## Common Mistakes to Avoid
| Mistake | Problem | Fix |
|---------|---------|-----|
| Too broad opening | "Since the dawn of time..." | Start at the field level, not civilization level |
| No clear gap | Reader does not understand why the paper is needed | State the gap explicitly in 1-2 sentences |
| Overpromising | Claims too broad relaTrust audit
SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | NA |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (0)
No findings outside the package's declared scope.
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
e1ba289846fdfull audit observations/trust-audit/skill/brycewang-stanford__introduction-writing-guide.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-08 | e1ba289846fd | SAFE | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Introduction Writing Guide skill do?
🔬 A curated collection of 23,000+ agent skills for empirical research across 8 social science disciplines. | 精选 23,000+ AI Agent 技能库,覆盖8大社会科学学科的实证研究。CoPaper.AI 20分钟完成一篇可复现的规范实证论文,并支持用户上传 Skills。-- Maintained by CoPaper.AI from Stanford REAP.
Is Introduction Writing Guide safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Introduction Writing Guide access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
Which assistants does Introduction Writing Guide work with?
Its documentation mentions openclaw. That is what the text claims, not a compatibility test we ran.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (e1ba289846fd), read on 2026-10-08. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.