Innovation Management GuideSAFE
🔬 A curated collection of 23,000+ agent skills for empirical research across 8 social science disciplines. | 精选 23,000+ AI Agent 技能库,覆盖8大社会科学学科的实证研究。CoPaper.AI 20分钟完成一篇可复现的规范实证论文,并支持用户上传 Skills。-- Maintained by CoPaper.AI from Stanford REAP.
Overview
🔬 A curated collection of 23,000+ agent skills for empirical research across 8 social science disciplines. | 精选 23,000+ AI Agent 技能库,覆盖8大社会科学学科的实证研究。CoPaper.AI 20分钟完成一篇可复现的规范实证论文,并支持用户上传 Skills。-- Maintained by CoPaper.AI from Stanford REAP.
e1ba289846fdOBSERVED · 2026-10-08Host compatibility
What the documentation claims. We have not run a compatibility test.
| Host | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| openclaw | mentioned |
What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
---
name: innovation-management-guide
description: "Innovation metrics, R&D management research, and technology forecasting"
metadata:
openclaw:
emoji: "💡"
category: "domains"
subcategory: "business"
keywords: ["innovation", "r-and-d", "technology-management", "bibliometrics", "diffusion", "strategy"]
source: "wentor"
---
# Innovation Management Guide
A skill for conducting research on innovation management, technology strategy, and R&D performance. Covers innovation measurement, technology forecasting, diffusion modeling, patent-publication linkage, and bibliometric analysis of research portfolios.
## Innovation Measurement
### Key Innovation Metrics
| Metric | Definition | Data Source |
|--------|-----------|-------------|
| R&D intensity | R&D spending / Revenue | Annual reports, Compustat |
| Patent count | Granted patents per year | USPTO, EPO |
| Citation-weighted patents | Patents weighted by forward citations | PatentsView |
| New product revenue share | Revenue from products < 3 years old | Internal data |
| Time to market | Concept to commercial launch | Project records |
| Innovation efficiency | Revenue from new products / R&D spend | Combined internal data |
### Building an Innovation Scorecard
```python
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
def compute_innovation_scorecard(firm_data: pd.DataFrame) -> pd.DataFrame:
"""
Compute a multi-dimensional innovation scorecard for firms.
firm_data columns: firm_id, rd_spend, revenue, patents_filed,
patents_granted, citation_count, new_product_revenue, employees
"""
scorecard = pd.DataFrame()
scorecard["firm_id"] = firm_data["firm_id"]
# Input metrics
scorecard["rd_intensity"] = firm_data["rd_spend"] / firm_data["revenue"]
scorecard["rd_per_employee"] = firm_data["rd_spend"] / firm_data["employees"]
# Output metrics
scorecard["patent_yield"] = (
firm_data["patents_granted"] / (firm_data["rd_spend"] / 1e6)
)
scorecard["citation_impact"] = (
firm_data["citation_count"] / firm_data["patents_granted"].clip(lower=1)
)
scorecard["new_product_share"] = (
firm_data["new_product_revenue"] / firm_data["revenue"]
)
# Efficiency
scorecard["innovation_efficiency"] = (
firm_data["new_product_revenue"] / firm_data["rd_spend"]
)
# Normalize to percentile ranks within the sample
for col in scorecard.columns[1:]:
scorecard[f"{col}_rank"] = scorecard[col].rank(pct=True)
# Composite score (equal weights)
rank_cols = [c for c in scorecard.columns if c.endswith("_rank")]
scorecard["composite_score"] = scorecard[rank_cols].mean(axis=1)
return scorecard.sort_values("composite_score", ascending=False)
```
## Technology Diffusion Models
### Bass Diffusion Model
The Bass model is the foundational framework for forecasting technology adoption:
```python
from scipy.optimize import curve_fit
def bass_model(t: np.ndarray, p: float, q: float, m: float) -> np.ndarray:
"""
Bass diffusion model for cumulative adoption.
t: time periods (0, 1, 2, ...)
p: coefficient of innovation (external influence)
q: coefficient of imitation (internal influence)
m: market potential (total eventual adopters)
Returns cumulative adoption at each time period.
"""
return m * (1 - np.exp(-(p + q) * t)) / (1 + (q / p) * np.exp(-(p + q) * t))
def bass_incremental(t: np.ndarray, p: float, q: float, m: float) -> np.ndarray:
"""Bass model incremental (new adopters per period)."""
F = bass_model(t, p, q, m) / m
f = (p + q * F) * (1 - F)
return m * f
def fit_bass_model(adoption_data: np.ndarray) -> dict:
"""
Fit Bass diffusion parameters to observed adoption data.
adoption_data: cumulative adoption counts per period.
"""
t = np.arange(len(adoption_data))
try:
popt, pcov = curve_fit(
bass_model, t, adoption_data,
p0=[0.01, 0.3, adoption_data[-1] * 2],
bounds=([0, 0, adoption_data[-1]], [1, 2, adoption_data[-1] * 10]),
maxfev=10000,
)
return {
"p_innovation": round(popt[0], 6),
"q_imitation": round(popt[1], 6),
"m_potential": round(popt[2], 0),
"peak_period": round(np.log(popt[1] / popt[0]) / (popt[0] + popt[1]), 1),
"q_p_ratio": round(popt[1] / popt[0], 2),
}
except RuntimeError:
return {"error": "convergence_failed"}
```
### Typical Bass Parameters by Technology Category
| Technology | p (innovation) | q (imitation) | q/p ratio |
|-----------|---------------|---------------|-----------|
| Consumer electronics | 0.01-0.03 | 0.3-0.5 | 10-50 |
| Enterprise software | 0.005-0.02 | 0.2-0.4 | 10-80 |
| Medical devices | 0.001-0.01 | 0.1-0.3 | 10-300 |
| Social media platforms | 0.03-0.10 | 0.5-0.8 | 5-25 |
## Bibliometric Analysis of R&D Portfolios
### Publication Portfolio Analysis
```python
def analyze_research_portfolio(publications: pd.DataFrame) -> dict:
"""
Bibliometric analysis of an organization's research portfolio.
publications columns: doi, title, year, journal, citations,
fields (list), authors (list), affiliations (list)
"""
# Publication trend
annual_pubs = publications.groupby("year").size()
# Citation impact
citation_stats = {
"total_citations": publications.citations.sum(),
"mean_citations": publications.citations.mean(),
"median_citations": publications.citations.median(),
"h_index": compute_h_index(publications.citations.values),
}
# Research field distribution
all_fields = []
for fields in publications.fields:
all_fields.extend(fields)
field_dist = pd.Series(all_fields).value_counts().head(20)
# Collaboration patterns
collab_rate = publications.affiliations.apply(
lambda x: len(set(x)) > 1
).mean()
return {
"total_publications": len(publicatiTrust audit
SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | NA |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (0)
No findings outside the package's declared scope.
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
e1ba289846fdfull audit observations/trust-audit/skill/brycewang-stanford__innovation-management-guide.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-08 | e1ba289846fd | SAFE | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Innovation Management Guide skill do?
🔬 A curated collection of 23,000+ agent skills for empirical research across 8 social science disciplines. | 精选 23,000+ AI Agent 技能库,覆盖8大社会科学学科的实证研究。CoPaper.AI 20分钟完成一篇可复现的规范实证论文,并支持用户上传 Skills。-- Maintained by CoPaper.AI from Stanford REAP.
Is Innovation Management Guide safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Innovation Management Guide access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
Which assistants does Innovation Management Guide work with?
Its documentation mentions openclaw. That is what the text claims, not a compatibility test we ran.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (e1ba289846fd), read on 2026-10-08. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.