History Research GuideSAFE
🔬 A curated collection of 23,000+ agent skills for empirical research across 8 social science disciplines. | 精选 23,000+ AI Agent 技能库,覆盖8大社会科学学科的实证研究。CoPaper.AI 20分钟完成一篇可复现的规范实证论文,并支持用户上传 Skills。-- Maintained by CoPaper.AI from Stanford REAP.
Overview
🔬 A curated collection of 23,000+ agent skills for empirical research across 8 social science disciplines. | 精选 23,000+ AI Agent 技能库,覆盖8大社会科学学科的实证研究。CoPaper.AI 20分钟完成一篇可复现的规范实证论文,并支持用户上传 Skills。-- Maintained by CoPaper.AI from Stanford REAP.
e1ba289846fdOBSERVED · 2026-10-08Host compatibility
What the documentation claims. We have not run a compatibility test.
| Host | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| openclaw | mentioned |
What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
---
name: history-research-guide
description: "Historical research from primary sources to scholarly analysis"
metadata:
openclaw:
emoji: "📜"
category: "domains"
subcategory: "humanities"
keywords: ["history", "primary sources", "archives", "historiography", "digital humanities", "periodization"]
source: "wentor-research-plugins"
---
# History Research Guide
## Overview
Historical research transforms raw evidence from the past -- documents, artifacts, images, oral testimonies -- into interpretive accounts that explain how and why things happened. The discipline demands a distinctive set of skills: source criticism, archival navigation, contextual reasoning, and the ability to construct arguments that are both evidence-based and theoretically informed.
The digital turn has expanded the historian's toolkit dramatically. Digitized archives, text mining, GIS mapping, and network analysis now complement traditional close reading. But the fundamentals remain unchanged: rigorous engagement with primary sources, awareness of historiographical debates, and transparent argumentation.
This guide covers the full research workflow for historians: finding and evaluating primary sources, navigating archives (physical and digital), applying source criticism, structuring historical arguments, and leveraging digital tools for analysis. It serves researchers at all levels, from graduate students designing their first archival project to established scholars integrating computational methods.
## Source Criticism: The Foundation
### External Criticism (Authenticity)
```
Questions to establish source authenticity:
1. PROVENANCE
- Where did this document come from?
- What is the chain of custody?
- Has it been reproduced, translated, or edited?
2. DATING
- When was it created? (Internal evidence: dates, references to events)
- Does the material form match the claimed period? (paper, ink, typeface)
- Are there anachronisms in language or content?
3. AUTHORSHIP
- Who created it? How do we know?
- Is the attribution reliable? (Handwriting analysis, stylistic evidence)
- Could it be pseudonymous or falsely attributed?
4. INTEGRITY
- Is the document complete or fragmentary?
- Has it been altered, censored, or interpolated?
- Are there multiple versions? Which is closest to the original?
```
### Internal Criticism (Reliability and Meaning)
```
Questions to interpret source content:
1. CONTEXT
- What was happening when this was written?
- What was the author's social position, education, ideology?
- What genre conventions shaped the document?
2. INTENTION
- Why was this created? (Inform, persuade, record, entertain)
- Who was the intended audience?
- What was the author trying to achieve?
3. RELIABILITY
- Was the author in a position to know what they describe?
- What biases might shape the account?
- How does it compare with other sources on the same events?
4. SILENCES
- What is NOT said? Who is absent from the account?
- What topics does the source avoid or minimize?
- What perspectives are excluded?
```
## Archival Research
### Preparing for the Archive
```
Pre-visit checklist:
1. FINDING AIDS
- Search online catalogs and finding aids before visiting
- Identify relevant record groups, series, and box numbers
- Contact the archivist: they know the collection better than anyone
2. PRACTICAL PREPARATION
- Check policies: photography allowed? Laptop permitted?
- Bring: pencils (no pens), laptop, camera, white gloves, notebook
- Register in advance (many archives require pre-registration)
- Book a desk (popular archives fill up, especially in summer)
3. RESEARCH PLAN
- Prioritize: You cannot read everything. What is essential?
- Prepare a list of specific documents, people, dates to search for
- Allow time for serendipity -- unexpected finds are common
4. DOCUMENTATION
- Record full archival citations for every document:
[Archive Name], [Collection Name], [Series], [Box], [Folder], [Item]
- Photograph everything you might need (storage is cheap)
- Take contextual notes alongside transcriptions
```
### Major Digital Archives
| Archive | Coverage | Access |
|---------|----------|--------|
| Internet Archive | 835B+ web pages, 44M+ books | Free |
| HathiTrust | 17M+ volumes from research libraries | Free (public domain) |
| JSTOR | 12M+ academic articles | Institutional subscription |
| Europeana | 50M+ cultural heritage objects | Free |
| Gallica (BnF) | French national library digitized | Free |
| DPLA | US libraries, archives, museums | Free |
| National Archives (US) | Federal government records | Free |
| British National Archives | UK government records | Free/paid |
| Google Books | Millions of scanned books | Partial free |
| ProQuest Historical Newspapers | Major newspaper archives | Institutional |
## Historiographical Frameworks
### Schools of Historical Thought
| School | Key Ideas | Key Figures |
|--------|-----------|-------------|
| Rankean positivism | "wie es eigentlich gewesen" (as it actually was) | Ranke |
| Annales School | Longue duree, mentalites, total history | Bloch, Braudel, Le Roy Ladurie |
| Marxist historiography | Class struggle, mode of production | Thompson, Hobsbawm, Hill |
| Social history | History from below, ordinary people | Thompson, Zinn |
| Cultural history | Representations, meaning, symbols | Darnton, Chartier, Burke |
| Postcolonial history | Subaltern voices, decolonizing the archive | Said, Spivak, Chakrabarty |
| Gender history | Gender as analytical category | Scott, Butler |
| Microhistory | Intensive study of small units | Ginzburg, Davis |
| Digital history | Computational methods, big data | Moretti, Underwood |
| Global history | Connected, entangled, transnational | Bayly, Conrad |
### Braudel's Three Temporalities
```
Time layers in historical analysis:
1. LONGUE DUREE (centuries)
- Geography, cTrust audit
SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | NA |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (0)
No findings outside the package's declared scope.
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
e1ba289846fdfull audit observations/trust-audit/skill/brycewang-stanford__history-research-guide.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-08 | e1ba289846fd | SAFE | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the History Research Guide skill do?
🔬 A curated collection of 23,000+ agent skills for empirical research across 8 social science disciplines. | 精选 23,000+ AI Agent 技能库,覆盖8大社会科学学科的实证研究。CoPaper.AI 20分钟完成一篇可复现的规范实证论文,并支持用户上传 Skills。-- Maintained by CoPaper.AI from Stanford REAP.
Is History Research Guide safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can History Research Guide access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
Which assistants does History Research Guide work with?
Its documentation mentions openclaw. That is what the text claims, not a compatibility test we ran.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (e1ba289846fd), read on 2026-10-08. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.