Grant Writing GuideSAFE
🔬 A curated collection of 23,000+ agent skills for empirical research across 8 social science disciplines. | 精选 23,000+ AI Agent 技能库,覆盖8大社会科学学科的实证研究。CoPaper.AI 20分钟完成一篇可复现的规范实证论文,并支持用户上传 Skills。-- Maintained by CoPaper.AI from Stanford REAP.
Overview
🔬 A curated collection of 23,000+ agent skills for empirical research across 8 social science disciplines. | 精选 23,000+ AI Agent 技能库,覆盖8大社会科学学科的实证研究。CoPaper.AI 20分钟完成一篇可复现的规范实证论文,并支持用户上传 Skills。-- Maintained by CoPaper.AI from Stanford REAP.
e1ba289846fdOBSERVED · 2026-10-08Host compatibility
What the documentation claims. We have not run a compatibility test.
| Host | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| openclaw | mentioned |
What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
---
name: grant-writing-guide
description: "Write competitive research proposals with clear objectives and budgets"
metadata:
openclaw:
emoji: "💰"
category: "research"
subcategory: "funding"
keywords: ["research proposal writing", "grant proposal", "grant writing", "budget planning", "funding application"]
source: "wentor"
---
# Grant Writing Guide
A skill for preparing competitive research grant proposals. Covers proposal structure, writing strategies, budget preparation, and common evaluation criteria used by major funding agencies (NSF, NIH, ERC, NSFC).
## Proposal Structure
### Generic Proposal Template
Most funding agencies require these core components:
```
1. Cover Page / Project Summary (1 page)
- Title (concise, descriptive, no jargon)
- PI name, institution, co-PIs
- Total budget and duration
- Abstract (250 words)
- Keywords (5-8)
2. Project Description / Research Plan (10-15 pages typically)
a. Introduction and Background
b. Specific Aims / Research Questions
c. Research Design and Methods
d. Timeline and Milestones
e. Expected Outcomes and Significance
f. Broader Impacts (NSF) / Societal Relevance
3. Literature Cited / References
4. Budget and Budget Justification
5. Biographical Sketches / CVs
6. Data Management Plan
7. Facilities and Equipment
8. Supplementary Materials (letters of support, etc.)
```
## Writing the Specific Aims
### The Critical First Page
The specific aims page is the most important page of any NIH-style proposal. Reviewers often form their opinion based on this page alone.
```python
def specific_aims_template(project_info: dict) -> str:
"""
Generate a specific aims page structure.
Args:
project_info: Dict with 'problem', 'gap', 'approach', 'aims', 'impact'
"""
template = f"""
SPECIFIC AIMS
[Opening paragraph: The big picture problem]
{project_info['problem']}
[Gap paragraph: What is unknown/unsolved]
{project_info['gap']}
[Approach paragraph: What will you do and why]
{project_info['approach']}
The long-term goal of this research is [long-term vision].
The objective of this proposal is [specific objective].
The central hypothesis is [testable hypothesis],
based on [preliminary data / rationale].
The following specific aims will test this hypothesis:
Aim 1: {project_info['aims'][0]['title']}
{project_info['aims'][0]['description']}
Hypothesis: {project_info['aims'][0]['hypothesis']}
Aim 2: {project_info['aims'][1]['title']}
{project_info['aims'][1]['description']}
Hypothesis: {project_info['aims'][1]['hypothesis']}
[Impact paragraph]
{project_info['impact']}
"""
return template
```
## Budget Preparation
### Common Budget Categories
```python
def create_budget(personnel: list[dict], equipment: list[dict],
travel: list[dict], other: list[dict],
indirect_rate: float = 0.55,
years: int = 3) -> dict:
"""
Create a research budget with indirect costs.
Args:
personnel: List of {'role', 'salary', 'effort_pct', 'fringe_rate'}
equipment: List of {'item', 'cost'}
travel: List of {'purpose', 'cost_per_year'}
other: List of {'item', 'cost_per_year'}
indirect_rate: F&A rate (decimal)
years: Project duration in years
"""
budget = {'years': {}}
for year in range(1, years + 1):
year_budget = {'categories': {}}
# Personnel (with annual salary increases of 3%)
personnel_total = 0
for person in personnel:
salary = person['salary'] * (1.03 ** (year - 1))
cost = salary * person['effort_pct'] / 100
fringe = cost * person['fringe_rate']
personnel_total += cost + fringe
year_budget['categories']['personnel'] = round(personnel_total)
# Equipment (Year 1 only for major items)
equip_total = sum(e['cost'] for e in equipment) if year == 1 else 0
year_budget['categories']['equipment'] = equip_total
# Travel
travel_total = sum(t['cost_per_year'] for t in travel)
year_budget['categories']['travel'] = travel_total
# Other direct costs
other_total = sum(o['cost_per_year'] for o in other)
year_budget['categories']['other'] = other_total
# Modified total direct costs (MTDC excludes equipment >$5000)
mtdc = personnel_total + travel_total + other_total
if equip_total < 5000:
mtdc += equip_total
# Indirect costs
indirect = mtdc * indirect_rate
year_budget['categories']['indirect'] = round(indirect)
year_budget['direct_total'] = round(
personnel_total + equip_total + travel_total + other_total
)
year_budget['total'] = round(
year_budget['direct_total'] + indirect
)
budget['years'][year] = year_budget
budget['grand_total'] = sum(y['total'] for y in budget['years'].values())
return budget
# Example budget
budget = create_budget(
personnel=[
{'role': 'PI', 'salary': 120000, 'effort_pct': 20, 'fringe_rate': 0.30},
{'role': 'Postdoc', 'salary': 56000, 'effort_pct': 100, 'fringe_rate': 0.25},
{'role': 'PhD Student', 'salary': 34000, 'effort_pct': 50, 'fringe_rate': 0.10}
],
equipment=[{'item': 'GPU server', 'cost': 15000}],
travel=[{'purpose': 'Conference attendance', 'cost_per_year': 3000}],
other=[
{'item': 'Publication charges', 'cost_per_year': 2000},
{'item': 'Cloud computing', 'cost_per_year': 5000}
],
indirect_rate=0.55,
years=3
)
```
## Evaluation Criteria by Agency
### NSF Review Criteria
| Criterion | Weight | Key Questions |
|-----------|--------|---------------|
| Intellectual Merit | ~50% | Does it advance knowledge? Is the approach sound? |
| Broader Impacts | ~50% | Societal benefit? Education? Diversity? Infrastructure? |
### NIH Review Criteria (Scored 1-9)
| CriTrust audit
SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | NA |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (0)
No findings outside the package's declared scope.
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
e1ba289846fdfull audit observations/trust-audit/skill/brycewang-stanford__grant-writing-guide.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-08 | e1ba289846fd | SAFE | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Grant Writing Guide skill do?
🔬 A curated collection of 23,000+ agent skills for empirical research across 8 social science disciplines. | 精选 23,000+ AI Agent 技能库,覆盖8大社会科学学科的实证研究。CoPaper.AI 20分钟完成一篇可复现的规范实证论文,并支持用户上传 Skills。-- Maintained by CoPaper.AI from Stanford REAP.
Is Grant Writing Guide safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Grant Writing Guide access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
Which assistants does Grant Writing Guide work with?
Its documentation mentions openclaw. That is what the text claims, not a compatibility test we ran.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (e1ba289846fd), read on 2026-10-08. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.