Agent skill · Audited from source
Er Abstract
skill · brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsMIT licenceAudited 20 Oct 2026 · source 9b73efe58ece
Is it safe? Yes — SAFE, grade B (89/100). We read this skill's source at commit 9b73efe58ece and found no filesystem, network or shell access and no hard-coded secrets. What it does: Use when drafting or revising the 中文内容提要 (~300 字, official) or English 梗概/Summary for an 《经济研究》 manuscript. Enforces the five-sentence Chinese pattern, the five-element English Summary, and forbids empty-significance…
Cite
Cite this page
ModelsAtlas. “Er Abstract (brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills)”. Retrieved 20 Oct 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/skills/brycewang-stanford/er-abstract
Trust audit
Audit 0.4.1 · source read 20 Oct 2026
SAFE means nothing in the source contradicts what the skill says it does. Grade B is shared by 13,985 of 14,816 audited skills.
What the source does
- FilesystemNone observedNo reads or writes in the source
- NetworkNone observedNo outbound calls in the source
- ShellNone observedNo commands run in the source
- DependenciesPinnedNothing floats
- SecretsNone foundNo keys in source
Five audit layers
| Layer | What we check | Result | Findings |
|---|---|---|---|
L0 Provenance | Repo owner, licence, archive status, activity | PASS | 0 |
L1 Static source | Secrets, path traversal, supply chain, hidden code | NA | 0 |
L2 Instructions | Prompt injection, authority framing, hidden directives | PASS | 0 |
L3 Inventory | The files and declarations match the source | PASS | 0 |
L4 Sandbox | Run in isolation and watch behaviour | SKIPPED why | 0 |
Gates applied: no behavioural pass.
Findings (0)
No findings at any severity. We re-audit when the source changes.
Audit 0.4.1 · source sha 9b73efe58ece · 20 Oct 2026Report an issue or request a re-scan
Provenance
Who published it, and what the verdict is pinned to
- Publisherbrycewang-stanford GitHub userOwner of the repository this skill is read from
- Source folderbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/Economic-Research-Journal-Skills/skills/er-abstractThe exact folder we audited
- LicenceMITAs the repository states it
- Commit pinned for this verdict9b73efe58eceA new audit runs when the source changes
- Repository statusNot archivedLast push 23 days ago
- Sandboxed runNot runSkills are read, not executed; layer L4 is skipped
What it tells the agent
Full source on GitHub ↗Its description: Use when drafting or revising the 中文内容提要 (~300 字, official) or English 梗概/Summary for an 《经济研究》 manuscript. Enforces the five-sentence Chinese pattern, the five-element English Summary, and forbids empty-significance…
--- name: er-abstract description: Use when drafting or revising the 中文内容提要 (~300 字, official) or English 梗概/Summary for an 《经济研究》 manuscript. Enforces the five-sentence Chinese pattern, the five-element English Summary, and forbids empty-significance phrases. 本技能服务于《经济研究》(Economic Research Journal, ERJ)。 --- # 摘要写作(er-abstract) ## 触发时机 - 摘要写成了一段"为...提供了新的视角"式套话 - 中文内容提要明显偏离官方口径(约 300 字) - 英文梗概与中文提要核心结论不对齐 - 投稿前发现摘要里没出现核心方法/数据/发现 ## 中文内容提要五句法(约 300 字) > 官方口径:中文内容提要"一般约 300 个汉字符,主要面向国内读者"。 | 句 | 字数 | 任务 | |----|------|------| | 第 1 句 | ~50 | 研究背景与问题:一句话点明现实问题 | | 第 2 句 | ~60 | 数据与方法:什么数据、什么识别策略 | | 第 3 句 | ~100 | 核心发现:用了什么 → 发现了什么(数字 + 方向)| | 第 4 句 | ~50 | 异质性与边界:在什么条件下效应更强/更弱 | | 第 5 句 | ~40 | 贡献与启示:为什么这个发现重要(**意义层,不要写"应该 XX"**)| ### 范例 > 企业所得税费用是研究企业所得税违规问题的常用信息。本文基于 2011–2016 年国泰安和全国税收调查数据库,采用交叠 DID 方法考察了税收征管数字化升级对企业所得税费用偏差的影响。研究发现:税收征管数字化升级显著降低了企业所得税费用偏差;这一效应通过抑制企业盈余管理和提高内部控制实现。当税务部门执法水平较高、公司治理水平较低时,抑制效应更加明显。本文对通过形成公平规范的税负环境推动经济高质量发展具有借鉴意义。 ## 英文梗概(English Summary)—— 五要素 + 中文对照 > ⚠ 口径校正:自 2017 年第 1 期起,《经济研究》以"**英文梗概(Summary)**"取代旧式英文摘要,且**比中文提要长得多**(是一篇浓缩全文的英文长摘要,非中文摘要的逐句翻译)。投稿时须**另附中文对照**——该对照仅供编辑校对、不刊出。**官方既未规定英文梗概的确切字符数,也未规定中文对照的字数**——不要纠结"4400/4500 字符""≥1000 字"这类坊间数字(因梗概是浓缩全文的长摘要,其中文对照通常明显长于约 300 字的中文提要,但无官方硬性下限),一切以投稿当期官网为准。 英文梗概须覆盖**五要素**(官方表述): 1. **研究背景与意义** Background & significance 2. **研究主题与思路** Topic & approach 3. **研究方法、理论依据、经验数据及来源** Method, theory, data & sources 4. **主要结论及政策建议** Main findings & policy implications(必须出现量化结果) 5. **重要创新与贡献** Key innovation & contribution(置于末尾,**避免** "this paper has important policy implications" 式空话) 写作顺序可微调,但五要素缺一不可。完成后**另写中文对照**随稿提交(仅供编校、不刊出;官方未规定字数)。 ## 自检清单 - [ ] 中文提要约 300 字,一句话点明核心研究问题 - [ ] 说明使用了什么数据和识别策略 - [ ] 核心发现给出**具体方向 + 量化**(不是"显著影响"四个字了事) - [ ] 体现了文章的独特贡献 - [ ] 英文梗概覆盖**五要素**,并已另附中文对照(仅供编校、不刊出) - [ ] 中英文摘要语义对齐(核心结论对得上) - [ ] 关键词 3–5 个,附对应英文 Key Words;JEL 分类号(强烈建议,非官方强制) ## 反模式(黑名单短语) - ❌ "本文具有重要的理论价值和现实意义" - ❌ "为 XX 研究提供了新的视角" - ❌ "对 XX 具有重要的参考价值" - ❌ "本文丰富了相关领域的研究" - ❌ "本研究有助于深化对 XX 的理解" 凡是删掉之后摘要不损失信息量的句子,都要删掉。 ## 输出格式 ``` 【中文提要字数】X(约 300 字) 【英文梗概五要素】齐 / 缺:[...] 【中文对照】有 / 无(仅供编校) 【五句法合规】是 / 否(缺哪一句) 【量化结果】有 / 无 【关键词】X 个(应 3–5)/ JEL:有 / 无 【黑名单短语命中】[...] 【下一步】er-literature-review 或 er-submission ```
Excerpt, first 2,216 characters of SKILL.md, verbatim from the audited commit. It is text from someone else’s repository, quoted so you can judge it before your agent reads it.
Install
Pinned to the audited commit 9b73efe
git clone https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills git -C Awesome-Journal-Skills checkout 9b73efe58ece
The author documents no install command, so this uses the repository directly. Our verdict covers commit 9b73efe58ece only.
Works in
The author has not said which agents this skill supports, and we have not tested it in any.
Audit history
Every audit, every source change
- ✓SAFE B 89 / 100
first audit · source
9b73efe58ece
README badge
For maintainers · shows the latest audit
[](https://modelsatlas.com/skills/brycewang-stanford/er-abstract/)
The badge shows our verdict and grade for this skill, and links back to this page. It changes when the audit does.
Similar skills
All research skills →brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
Use when an Economic-Research manuscript is at the topic-selection stage and the theoretical grounding, marginal-contribution sentence, or venue match are unsettled. Produces the contribution-sentence template and the…
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
Use when deciding which er-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for 《经济研究》 (Economic Research Journal). Routes — does not replace — the specialized skills.
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
Use when finalizing regression tables and figures for an Economic-Research manuscript. Enforces three-line table style, footnote conventions, column-count discipline, and figure aesthetics.
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for 《经济研究》 — anonymization, author rules, abstract & keywords, reference style, anti-plagiarism, supplementary files, and the submission portal. Distinguishes…
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
Use when polishing the language and rhetoric of an 《经济研究》 manuscript — eliminating empty-significance phrases, fixing vague policy talk, replacing method-flexing with mechanism, and aligning tense / person / hedging…
brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills
Use when responding to reviewer and editorial-board reports for an 《经济研究》 (Economic Research Journal) R&R — sequencing manuscript revision before letter writing, drafting point-by-point replies in the accept /…
Add this badge to your README
[](https://modelsatlas.com/skills/brycewang-stanford/er-abstract/)
<a href="https://modelsatlas.com/skills/brycewang-stanford/er-abstract/"><img src="https://modelsatlas.com/skills/brycewang-stanford/er-abstract/badge.svg" alt="ModelsAtlas: SAFE B"></a>
Questions about Er Abstract
What does the Er Abstract skill do?
Is Er Abstract safe to install?
What can Er Abstract access on my machine?
How current is this page?
Sources
- github.com/brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills/tree/main/E — the audited source at commit 9b73efe58ece and every finding aboveObserved · 20 Oct 2026
Spotted something wrong? Report a correction · Methodology
Keep going in your AI
Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.
- What does the Er Abstract skill do?
- Is Er Abstract safe to install?
- What can Er Abstract access on my machine?