Concept Map GeneratorSAFE
🔬 A curated collection of 23,000+ agent skills for empirical research across 8 social science disciplines. | 精选 23,000+ AI Agent 技能库,覆盖8大社会科学学科的实证研究。CoPaper.AI 20分钟完成一篇可复现的规范实证论文,并支持用户上传 Skills。-- Maintained by CoPaper.AI from Stanford REAP.
Overview
🔬 A curated collection of 23,000+ agent skills for empirical research across 8 social science disciplines. | 精选 23,000+ AI Agent 技能库,覆盖8大社会科学学科的实证研究。CoPaper.AI 20分钟完成一篇可复现的规范实证论文,并支持用户上传 Skills。-- Maintained by CoPaper.AI from Stanford REAP.
e1ba289846fdOBSERVED · 2026-10-08Host compatibility
What the documentation claims. We have not run a compatibility test.
| Host | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| openclaw | mentioned |
What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
---
name: concept-map-generator
description: "Generate structured concept maps from academic texts automatically"
metadata:
openclaw:
emoji: "🧠"
category: "tools"
subcategory: "knowledge-graph"
keywords: ["concept map", "knowledge representation", "text mining", "ontology", "semantic extraction", "mind map"]
source: "wentor-research-plugins"
---
# Concept Map Generator
A skill for automatically generating structured concept maps from academic texts, lecture notes, and research papers. Covers concept extraction using NLP techniques, relationship identification, hierarchical organization, and export to visual formats. Concept maps differ from mind maps in that they explicitly label relationships between concepts, making them more suitable for representing scientific knowledge.
## Concept Map Fundamentals
### Structure of a Concept Map
A concept map consists of three elements: concepts (nodes), linking phrases (labeled edges), and propositions (concept-link-concept triples that form meaningful statements).
```
Concept Map Elements:
Concept: A perceived regularity or pattern designated by a label.
Examples: "DNA replication", "enzyme", "natural selection"
Representation: boxes or ovals containing short noun phrases
Linking Phrase: Words that connect two concepts to form a proposition.
Examples: "is catalyzed by", "requires", "leads to", "is a type of"
Representation: labeled arrows between concept nodes
Proposition: A meaningful statement formed by two concepts and a link.
Example: [DNA replication] --requires--> [DNA polymerase]
This reads: "DNA replication requires DNA polymerase"
Cross-links: Connections between concepts in different domains or
branches of the map, showing integrative understanding.
```
### Concept Maps vs Mind Maps
```
Feature Concept Map Mind Map
-------------- ------------------ ------------------
Structure Network (graph) Tree (hierarchical)
Relationships Labeled explicitly Implied by proximity
Root node May have multiple Single central topic
Cross-links Encouraged Rare
Best for Deep understanding Brainstorming
Scientific use Knowledge modeling Idea generation
Reading direction Follow arrow labels Center outward
```
## Automated Concept Extraction
### NLP Pipeline for Extraction
```python
import spacy
def extract_concepts(text, nlp_model="en_core_web_sm"):
"""
Extract candidate concepts from academic text using NLP.
Strategy:
1. Extract noun phrases as concept candidates
2. Filter by frequency and specificity
3. Merge overlapping spans
4. Rank by TF-IDF relevance
"""
nlp = spacy.load(nlp_model)
doc = nlp(text)
# Extract noun phrases
candidates = []
for chunk in doc.noun_chunks:
# Remove determiners and leading adjectives for cleaner concepts
clean = chunk.text.strip()
if len(clean.split()) <= 4: # Keep manageable length
candidates.append(clean.lower())
# Count frequencies
from collections import Counter
freq = Counter(candidates)
# Filter: keep concepts mentioned at least twice
concepts = [c for c, count in freq.most_common() if count >= 2]
return concepts
```
### Relationship Extraction
```python
def extract_relationships(text, concepts, nlp_model="en_core_web_sm"):
"""
Extract relationships between concepts using dependency parsing.
Identifies verb phrases connecting known concepts in the same sentence.
"""
nlp = spacy.load(nlp_model)
doc = nlp(text)
concept_set = set(concepts)
triples = []
for sent in doc.sents:
sent_text = sent.text.lower()
# Find which concepts appear in this sentence
found = [c for c in concept_set if c in sent_text]
if len(found) >= 2:
# Extract the verb connecting them
verbs = [token.lemma_ for token in sent
if token.pos_ == "VERB"]
if verbs:
for i in range(len(found)):
for j in range(i + 1, len(found)):
triples.append({
"source": found[i],
"target": found[j],
"relation": verbs[0],
"sentence": sent.text
})
return triples
```
## Hierarchical Organization
### Building Concept Hierarchies
Academic concept maps benefit from hierarchical organization, placing the most general, inclusive concepts at the top and progressively more specific concepts below.
```
Hierarchy Construction Algorithm:
1. Identify superordinate concepts:
- Concepts that appear in titles, abstracts, section headings
- Concepts with the most outgoing relationships
- Concepts that subsume other concepts (hypernyms)
2. Identify subordinate concepts:
- Concepts that are instances or types of superordinates
- Concepts with high specificity (long noun phrases)
- Concepts that appear only in methods/results sections
3. Assign levels:
Level 0: Domain (e.g., "machine learning")
Level 1: Subdomains (e.g., "supervised learning", "unsupervised learning")
Level 2: Methods (e.g., "random forests", "k-means clustering")
Level 3: Details (e.g., "Gini impurity", "elbow method")
4. Add cross-links between branches:
e.g., "random forests" --uses--> "bootstrap sampling"
(links supervised learning to statistical methods)
```
### Strategies for Academic Papers
```
Input: Research paper
Output: Concept map organized by paper structure
Section-Based Extraction:
Introduction -> Key concepts, research questions, theoretical framework
Methods -> Methodological concepts, tools, techniques, variables
Results -> Findings, measurements, statistical outcomes
Discussion -> Interpretations, implications, limitations
Connection Types in Academic Maps:
"isTrust audit
SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | NA |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (0)
No findings outside the package's declared scope.
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
e1ba289846fdfull audit observations/trust-audit/skill/brycewang-stanford__concept-map-generator.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-08 | e1ba289846fd | SAFE | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Concept Map Generator skill do?
🔬 A curated collection of 23,000+ agent skills for empirical research across 8 social science disciplines. | 精选 23,000+ AI Agent 技能库,覆盖8大社会科学学科的实证研究。CoPaper.AI 20分钟完成一篇可复现的规范实证论文,并支持用户上传 Skills。-- Maintained by CoPaper.AI from Stanford REAP.
Is Concept Map Generator safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Concept Map Generator access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
Which assistants does Concept Map Generator work with?
Its documentation mentions openclaw. That is what the text claims, not a compatibility test we ran.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (e1ba289846fd), read on 2026-10-08. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.