Abstract Writing GuideSAFE
🔬 A curated collection of 23,000+ agent skills for empirical research across 8 social science disciplines. | 精选 23,000+ AI Agent 技能库,覆盖8大社会科学学科的实证研究。CoPaper.AI 20分钟完成一篇可复现的规范实证论文,并支持用户上传 Skills。-- Maintained by CoPaper.AI from Stanford REAP.
Overview
🔬 A curated collection of 23,000+ agent skills for empirical research across 8 social science disciplines. | 精选 23,000+ AI Agent 技能库,覆盖8大社会科学学科的实证研究。CoPaper.AI 20分钟完成一篇可复现的规范实证论文,并支持用户上传 Skills。-- Maintained by CoPaper.AI from Stanford REAP.
e1ba289846fdOBSERVED · 2026-10-08Host compatibility
What the documentation claims. We have not run a compatibility test.
| Host | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| openclaw | mentioned |
What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
---
name: abstract-writing-guide
description: "Craft structured research abstracts that maximize clarity and journal acceptance"
metadata:
openclaw:
emoji: "📝"
category: "writing"
subcategory: "composition"
keywords: ["abstract writing", "summary writing", "research abstract", "paper title writing", "structured abstract"]
source: "wentor"
---
# Abstract Writing Guide
A skill for writing effective research abstracts that clearly communicate your study's purpose, methods, results, and significance. Covers structured and unstructured formats, word count optimization, and common pitfalls.
## Abstract Structures
### Structured Abstract (IMRaD)
Most journals in science and medicine require a structured abstract:
```
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: 1-2 sentences on the problem and study aim
METHODS: 2-3 sentences on study design, participants, and analysis
RESULTS: 2-4 sentences with key quantitative findings
CONCLUSION: 1-2 sentences on implications and significance
Total: typically 150-300 words (check journal requirements)
```
### Unstructured Abstract
Common in social sciences and humanities:
```
Sentence 1: Context and problem statement
Sentence 2: Research gap or objective
Sentence 3: Methods overview
Sentence 4-5: Key findings
Sentence 6: Implications and significance
Total: typically 150-250 words
```
## Writing Process
### Step-by-Step Framework
```python
def generate_abstract_outline(study_info: dict) -> dict:
"""
Generate an abstract outline from study information.
Args:
study_info: Dict with keys: 'problem', 'gap', 'objective',
'design', 'sample', 'methods', 'key_findings',
'implications', 'word_limit'
Returns:
Structured abstract outline with estimated word counts
"""
word_limit = study_info.get('word_limit', 250)
# Allocate words proportionally
sections = {
'background': {
'allocation_pct': 0.15,
'content': [study_info['problem'], study_info['gap']],
'template': "Despite {problem}, {gap}. This study aimed to {objective}."
},
'methods': {
'allocation_pct': 0.25,
'content': [study_info['design'], study_info['sample'], study_info['methods']],
'template': "A {design} was conducted with {sample}. {methods}."
},
'results': {
'allocation_pct': 0.35,
'content': study_info['key_findings'],
'template': "Results showed {findings}."
},
'conclusion': {
'allocation_pct': 0.25,
'content': study_info['implications'],
'template': "These findings suggest {implications}."
}
}
for section in sections.values():
section['target_words'] = round(word_limit * section['allocation_pct'])
return {
'sections': sections,
'word_limit': word_limit,
'tips': [
'Write the Results section first (most important)',
'Use past tense for methods and results',
'Avoid abbreviations unless space-saving is critical',
'Include at least one quantitative result with effect size',
'Do not include citations in the abstract'
]
}
```
### Example: Well-Written Abstract
```
Background: Chronic low back pain affects 23% of the global adult population,
yet optimal exercise interventions remain unclear. This systematic review and
meta-analysis aimed to compare the effectiveness of yoga, Pilates, and
general exercise for reducing pain and disability in chronic low back pain.
Methods: We searched PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and PEDro from
inception to December 2025. Randomized controlled trials comparing yoga,
Pilates, or general exercise to usual care were included. Pain (VAS/NRS)
and disability (ODI/RMDQ) were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis.
Results: Thirty-seven RCTs (N = 3,421) met inclusion criteria. All exercise
types significantly reduced pain compared to usual care: yoga (SMD = -0.73,
95% CI [-0.94, -0.52]), Pilates (SMD = -0.62, 95% CI [-0.81, -0.43]),
and general exercise (SMD = -0.48, 95% CI [-0.63, -0.33]). Yoga showed
significantly greater pain reduction than general exercise (p = 0.03)
but not Pilates (p = 0.28). Heterogeneity was moderate (I-squared = 48-61%).
Conclusion: Yoga, Pilates, and general exercise all effectively reduce
chronic low back pain, with yoga showing a modest advantage over general
exercise. Clinicians should consider patient preferences when recommending
exercise modalities.
```
## Title Writing
### Title Construction Principles
```python
def evaluate_title(title: str) -> dict:
"""Evaluate a paper title against best practices."""
checks = {}
# Length check
word_count = len(title.split())
checks['word_count'] = word_count
checks['length_ok'] = 10 <= word_count <= 20
# Key content checks
checks['has_colon'] = ':' in title # Structured titles often use colons
checks['starts_with_article'] = title.lower().startswith(('a ', 'an ', 'the '))
checks['has_abbreviation'] = any(w.isupper() and len(w) > 1 for w in title.split())
# Title type classification
if '?' in title:
checks['type'] = 'question'
elif ':' in title:
checks['type'] = 'compound'
elif title.split()[0].endswith('ing'):
checks['type'] = 'gerund'
else:
checks['type'] = 'declarative'
checks['recommendations'] = []
if word_count > 20:
checks['recommendations'].append('Consider shortening -- aim for 10-15 words')
if word_count < 8:
checks['recommendations'].append('Consider adding specificity')
if checks['starts_with_article']:
checks['recommendations'].append('Avoid starting with articles (A/An/The)')
if checks['has_abbreviation']:
checks['recommendations'].append('Spell out abbreviations in titles')
return checks
```
### Title Patterns by DisTrust audit
SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | NA |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (0)
No findings outside the package's declared scope.
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
e1ba289846fdfull audit observations/trust-audit/skill/brycewang-stanford__abstract-writing-guide.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-08 | e1ba289846fd | SAFE | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Abstract Writing Guide skill do?
🔬 A curated collection of 23,000+ agent skills for empirical research across 8 social science disciplines. | 精选 23,000+ AI Agent 技能库,覆盖8大社会科学学科的实证研究。CoPaper.AI 20分钟完成一篇可复现的规范实证论文,并支持用户上传 Skills。-- Maintained by CoPaper.AI from Stanford REAP.
Is Abstract Writing Guide safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Abstract Writing Guide access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
Which assistants does Abstract Writing Guide work with?
Its documentation mentions openclaw. That is what the text claims, not a compatibility test we ran.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (e1ba289846fd), read on 2026-10-08. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.