ui-test

What the source does

• FilesystemNone observedNo reads or writes in the source
• NetworkNone observedNo outbound calls in the source
• ShellNone observedNo commands run in the source
• DependenciesPinnedNothing floats
• SecretsNone foundNo keys in source

Five audit layers

Gates applied: no behavioural pass.

| Deployed/staging site | Remote | `browse open <url> --remote` | Browserbase credentials; use contexts where supported |

- **Localhost** → `browse open <url> --local` (no API key needed)

Audit 0.4.1 · source sha 45d21dc75974 · 31 Oct 2026Report an issue or request a re-scan

• Publisherbrowserbase GitHub organizationOwner of the repository this skill is read from
• Source folderbrowserbase/skills/skills/ui-testThe exact folder we audited
• LicenceNot declaredAs the repository states it
• Commit pinned for this verdict45d21dc75974A new audit runs when the source changes
• Repository statusNot archivedLast push 3 days ago
• Sandboxed runNot runSkills are read, not executed; layer L4 is skipped

Its description: AI-powered adversarial UI testing via the browse CLI. Analyzes git diffs to test only what changed, or explores the full app to find bugs. Tests functional correctness, accessibility, responsive layout, and UX…

---
name: ui-test
description: "AI-powered adversarial UI testing via the browse CLI. Analyzes git diffs to test only what changed, or explores the full app to find bugs. Tests functional correctness, accessibility, responsive layout, and UX heuristics. Use when the user asks to test UI changes, QA a pull request, audit accessibility, or run exploratory testing. Supports local browser (localhost) and remote Browserbase (deployed sites)."
license: MIT
metadata:
  author: browserbase
  version: "0.4.0"
allowed-tools: Bash Read Glob Grep Agent
compatibility: "Requires the browse CLI (`npm install -g browse`). For remote testing: BROWSERBASE_API_KEY and cookie-sync skill."
---

# UI Test — Agentic UI Testing Skill

Test UI changes in a real browser. Your job is to **try to break things**, not confirm they work.

Three workflows:
- **Diff-driven** — analyze a git diff, test only what changed
- **Exploratory** — navigate the app, find bugs the developer didn't think about
- **Parallel** — fan out independent test groups across multiple Browserbase browsers

## How Testing Works

The main agent **coordinates** — it plans test strategy, delegates to sub-agents, and merges results. Sub-agents do the actual browser testing.

### Planning: multiple angles, then execute once

**You MUST complete all three planning rounds yourself and output them before launching any sub-agents.** Planning happens in your own response — it is NOT delegated to sub-agents. Do not skip ahead to execution.

**Round 1 — Functional:** What are the core user flows? What should work? Write out each test as: action → expected result.

**Round 2 — Adversarial:** Re-read Round 1. What did you miss? Think about: different user types/roles, error paths, empty states, race conditions, edge inputs (empty, huge, special chars, rapid clicks).

**Round 3 — Coverage gaps:** Re-read Rounds 1–2. What about: accessibility (axe-core, keyboard-only), mobile viewports, console errors, visual consistency with the rest of the app?

**Deduplicate:** Merge all three rounds into one numbered list of tests. Remove overlaps. Assign each test to a group (e.g. Group A, Group B).

**Then execute once** — launch one sub-agent per group. Each sub-agent receives its specific list of tests to run, nothing more. Sub-agents do not explore or plan — they execute assigned tests and report results.

Output the three rounds, the merged plan, and the group assignments in your response before calling any Agent tool.

### Principles for splitting work

- **Sub-agents run assigned tests, not open exploration.** The main agent hands each sub-agent a specific numbered list of tests. Sub-agents do not plan, explore, or decide what to test — they execute the list and stop.
- **The bottleneck is the slowest agent** — split work so no single agent has a disproportionate share. Many small agents > few large ones.
- **Size the effort to the change** — a single component fix doesn't need many agents or many steps. A full-page redesign does. Let the scope of the diff drive the plan.
- **No early stopping on failures** — find as many bugs as possible within the assigned tests.

### Giving sub-agents a step budget

**The main agent MUST include an explicit browse step limit in every sub-agent prompt.** Sub-agents do not self-limit — they will run until done unless told otherwise.

As a rough heuristic: ~25 steps for a few targeted checks, ~40 for a full page with functional + adversarial + a11y, ~75 for multiple pages or a broad category. **Adjust based on what the assigned tests actually require** — these are starting points, not rules.

As a rough heuristic: ~25 steps for a few targeted checks, ~40 for a full page with functional + adversarial + a11y, ~75 for multiple pages or a broad category. **Adjust based on what the assigned tests actually require** — these are starting points, not rules.

Every sub-agent prompt must include:
```
You have a budget of N browse steps (each `browse` command = 1 step). Count your steps as you go. When you reach N, stop immediately and report:
- STEP_PASS/STEP_FAIL for every test you completed
- STEP_SKIP|<test-id>|budget reached for every test you didn't get to

Do not retry or continue after hitting the budget.
Run only these tests: [numbered list from the merged plan]
Do not explore beyond the assigned tests.
Do NOT generate an HTML report or write any files. Return only step markers and your findings as text.
```

The main agent should NOT run `browse` commands itself (except to verify the dev server is up). All testing happens in sub-agents.

**When a sub-agent hits its budget, the main agent accepts the partial results as-is.** Do not re-run or retry the sub-agent. Include SKIPPED tests in the final report so the developer knows what wasn't covered.

### Reporting

**Every sub-agent reports back with:**
```
Tests: 8 | Passed: 5 | Failed: 2 | Skipped: 1 | Pages visited: 2
```

**The main agent merges into a final report with:**
```
Tests: 20 | Passed: 14 | Failed: 4 | Skipped: 2 | Agents: 3 | Pass rate: 70%
```

Do not report "steps used" — browse command counts are implementation plumbing, not a meaningful metric for reviewers.

## Testing Philosophy

**You are an adversarial tester.** Your goal is to find bugs, not prove correctness.

- **Try to break every feature you test.** Don't just check "does the button exist?" — click it twice rapidly, submit empty forms, paste 500 characters, press Escape mid-flow.
- **Test what the developer didn't think about.** Empty states, error recovery, keyboard-only navigation, mobile overflow.
- **Every assertion must be evidence-based.** Compare before/after snapshots. Check specific elements by ref. Never report PASS without concrete evidence from the accessibility tree or a deterministic check.
- **Report failures with enough detail to reproduce.** Include the exact action, what you expected, what you got, and a suggested fix.

## Assertion Protocol

Every test step MUST produce a structured asser

Excerpt, first 6,000 characters of SKILL.md, verbatim from the audited commit. It is text from someone else’s repository, quoted so you can judge it before your agent reads it.

1. 2026-10-31
   !CAUTION B 89 / 100

   first audit · source 45d21dc75974

Questions about ui-test

• github.com/browserbase/skills/tree/main/skills/ui-test — the audited source at commit 45d21dc75974 and every finding aboveObserved · 31 Oct 2026

Spotted something wrong? Report a correction · Methodology