Agent skill · Audited from source
Ciso Advisor
skill · borghei/Claude-SkillsNOASSERTION licenceAudited 19 Oct 2026 · source 6e3fcbdbb5cf
Is it safe? With care — CAUTION, grade B (89/100). We read this skill's source at commit 6e3fcbdbb5cf and found no filesystem, network or shell access and no hard-coded secrets. The audit raised 5 findings, 0 critical or high. What it does: Security leadership for growth-stage companies. Use when building security programs, selecting compliance frameworks (SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR), managing incidents, or assessing vendor risk.
Cite
Cite this page
ModelsAtlas. “Ciso Advisor (borghei/Claude-Skills)”. Retrieved 19 Oct 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/skills/borghei/ciso-advisor
2 skills are called “Ciso Advisor”. You are viewing borghei/Claude-Skills.
- borghei/Claude-Skills★ 949!CAUTION
- alirezarezvani/claude-skills★ 28k!CAUTION
Trust audit
Audit 0.4.1 · source read 19 Oct 2026
CAUTION means the audit found things worth knowing before you trust this skill. Grade B is shared by 13,985 of 14,816 audited skills.
What the source does
- FilesystemNone observedNo reads or writes in the source
- NetworkNone observedNo outbound calls in the source
- ShellNone observedNo commands run in the source
- DependenciesPinnedNothing floats
- SecretsNone foundNo keys in source
Five audit layers
| Layer | What we check | Result | Findings |
|---|---|---|---|
L0 Provenance | Repo owner, licence, archive status, activity | WARN | 5 |
L1 Static source | Secrets, path traversal, supply chain, hidden code | PASS | 0 |
L2 Instructions | Prompt injection, authority framing, hidden directives | PASS | 0 |
L3 Inventory | The files and declarations match the source | PASS | 0 |
L4 Sandbox | Run in isolation and watch behaviour | SKIPPED why | 0 |
Gates applied: no behavioural pass.
Findings (5)
MEDIUMInventory / provenanceinv.symlink · .codex/skills/a11y-audit
.codex/skills/a11y-audit
- Why
- link not followed
- Fix
- —
MEDIUMInventory / provenanceinv.symlink · .codex/skills/ab-test-setup
.codex/skills/ab-test-setup
- Why
- link not followed
- Fix
- —
MEDIUMInventory / provenanceinv.symlink · .codex/skills/account-executive
.codex/skills/account-executive
- Why
- link not followed
- Fix
- —
MEDIUMInventory / provenanceinv.symlink · .codex/skills/ad-creative
.codex/skills/ad-creative
- Why
- link not followed
- Fix
- —
MEDIUMInventory / provenanceinv.symlink · .codex/skills/aeo
.codex/skills/aeo
- Why
- link not followed
- Fix
- —
Audit 0.4.1 · source sha 6e3fcbdbb5cf · 19 Oct 2026Report an issue or request a re-scan
Provenance
Who published it, and what the verdict is pinned to
- Publisherborghei GitHub userOwner of the repository this skill is read from
- Source folderborghei/Claude-Skills/c-level-advisor/ciso-advisorThe exact folder we audited
- LicenceNOASSERTIONAs the repository states it
- Commit pinned for this verdict6e3fcbdbb5cfA new audit runs when the source changes
- Repository statusNot archivedLast push 12 days ago
- Sandboxed runNot runSkills are read, not executed; layer L4 is skipped
What it tells the agent
Full source on GitHub ↗Its description: Security leadership for growth-stage companies. Use when building security programs, selecting compliance frameworks (SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR), managing incidents, or assessing vendor risk.
---
name: ciso-advisor
description: >
Security leadership for growth-stage companies. Use when building security
programs, selecting compliance frameworks (SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR),
managing incidents, or assessing vendor risk.
license: MIT + Commons Clause
metadata:
version: 2.0.0
author: borghei
category: c-level
domain: ciso-leadership
updated: 2026-03-09
frameworks:
- risk-based-security
- zero-trust-architecture
- defense-in-depth
- compliance-sequencing
- incident-response-leadership
- vendor-risk-management
triggers:
- CISO
- security strategy
- risk quantification
- compliance roadmap
- SOC 2
- ISO 27001
- HIPAA
- GDPR
- zero trust
- incident response
- board security reporting
- vendor assessment
- security budget
- penetration testing
- vulnerability management
- data protection
- security audit
- cyber risk
- security program
- threat modeling
---
# CISO Advisor
Risk-based security frameworks for growth-stage companies. Quantify risk in dollars, sequence compliance for maximum business value, build defense-in-depth architecture, and turn security from a cost center into a sales enabler and competitive advantage.
## Keywords
CISO, security strategy, risk quantification, ALE, SLE, ARO, security posture, compliance roadmap, SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR, zero trust, defense in depth, incident response, board security reporting, vendor assessment, security budget, cyber risk, program maturity, penetration testing, vulnerability management, data classification, threat modeling, security awareness, phishing, MFA, IAM
---
## Risk Quantification Framework
Every security investment must be justified in business terms. "We need better security" is not a business case. "$800K expected annual loss from this unmitigated risk" is.
### Core Formula
```
ALE = SLE x ARO
ALE = Annual Loss Expectancy (expected cost per year)
SLE = Single Loss Expectancy (cost if the event occurs once)
ARO = Annual Rate of Occurrence (probability of occurrence per year)
```
### Risk Register Template
| Risk ID | Threat | Asset | SLE | ARO | ALE | Mitigation Cost | ROI | Priority |
|---------|--------|-------|-----|-----|-----|-----------------|-----|----------|
| R-001 | Data breach (customer PII) | Customer database | $2.5M | 0.15 | $375K | $120K/yr | 3.1x | Critical |
| R-002 | Ransomware | Production systems | $1.8M | 0.10 | $180K | $80K/yr | 2.3x | High |
| R-003 | Insider threat | Source code | $500K | 0.05 | $25K | $40K/yr | 0.6x | Medium |
| R-004 | DDoS | Customer-facing app | $200K | 0.20 | $40K | $30K/yr | 1.3x | Medium |
| R-005 | Third-party breach | Vendor with PII access | $1.2M | 0.08 | $96K | $25K/yr | 3.8x | High |
### Risk Prioritization Decision Tree
```
START: New risk identified
|
v
[Calculate ALE]
|
+-- ALE > $200K/yr --> CRITICAL: Board-level reporting, immediate mitigation
|
+-- ALE $50K-$200K --> HIGH: Quarterly review, funded mitigation plan
|
+-- ALE $10K-$50K --> MEDIUM: Annual review, budget if ROI > 1.5x
|
+-- ALE < $10K --> LOW: Accept risk, document decision, monitor
```
### SLE Component Breakdown
| Cost Component | Description | Typical Range |
|---------------|-------------|---------------|
| Direct costs | Forensics, remediation, legal | $100K-$500K |
| Regulatory fines | GDPR: up to 4% revenue; HIPAA: $100-$50K per record | Varies widely |
| Notification costs | $5-$50 per affected individual | Scale with records |
| Business interruption | Lost revenue during downtime | Hours x hourly revenue |
| Reputation damage | Customer churn, brand impact | 2-5% annual revenue |
| Legal liability | Lawsuits, settlements | $50K-$5M+ |
---
## Compliance Roadmap
### Sequencing for Maximum Business Value
```
Phase 1: Foundation (Months 1-3)
Basic hygiene: MFA, endpoint protection, access controls, backups
Cost: $20-50K Impact: Blocks 80% of common attacks
Phase 2: SOC 2 Type I (Months 3-6)
Policies, procedures, controls documentation
Cost: $50-100K Impact: Unlocks mid-market enterprise sales
Phase 3: SOC 2 Type II (Months 6-12)
Sustained controls operation + audit
Cost: $80-150K Impact: Required by most enterprise buyers
Phase 4: Specialized (Months 12-18)
ISO 27001, HIPAA, or GDPR based on market requirements
Cost: $100-250K Impact: Market-specific requirement fulfillment
```
### Compliance Framework Comparison
| Framework | Timeline | Cost | Best For | Customer Requirement |
|-----------|----------|------|----------|---------------------|
| SOC 2 Type I | 3-6 months | $50-100K | B2B SaaS selling to US companies | Most common ask |
| SOC 2 Type II | 6-12 months | $80-150K | Sustained enterprise sales | Required for large deals |
| ISO 27001 | 9-15 months | $100-200K | European market, global companies | EU enterprise standard |
| HIPAA | 6-12 months | $80-200K | Healthcare data handling | Healthcare vertical |
| GDPR | 3-6 months | $30-80K | Any company with EU users | Legal requirement |
| PCI DSS | 6-12 months | $100-300K | Payment card processing | Payment requirement |
| FedRAMP | 12-24 months | $500K-2M | US federal government sales | Government requirement |
### Framework Overlap Matrix
| Control Area | SOC 2 | ISO 27001 | HIPAA | GDPR |
|-------------|-------|-----------|-------|------|
| Access control | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Encryption | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Incident response | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Risk assessment | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Vendor management | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Data classification | Partial | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Physical security | Yes | Yes | Yes | Partial |
| Business continuity | Yes | Yes | Partial | Partial |
| Privacy by design | No | Partial | Partial | Yes |
**Key insight**: SOC 2 + ISO 27001 share approximately 70% of controls. Do SOC 2 first, then extend to ISO 27001 with ~30% incremental effort.
---
## Security Architecture StrategyExcerpt, first 6,000 characters of SKILL.md, verbatim from the audited commit. It is text from someone else’s repository, quoted so you can judge it before your agent reads it.
Install
Pinned to the audited commit 6e3fcbd
git clone https://github.com/borghei/Claude-Skills git -C Claude-Skills checkout 6e3fcbdbb5cf
The author documents no install command, so this uses the repository directly. Our verdict covers commit 6e3fcbdbb5cf only.
Works in
The author has not said which agents this skill supports, and we have not tested it in any.
Audit history
Every audit, every source change
- !CAUTION B 89 / 100
first audit · source
6e3fcbdbb5cf
Similar skills
All coding & review skills →borghei/Claude-Skills
This skill should be used when the user asks to "check accessibility", "audit WCAG compliance", "scan HTML for a11y issues", "check color contrast", or "find accessibility violations in web pages".
borghei/Claude-Skills
Designs multi-agent system architectures with orchestration patterns, tool schemas, and performance evaluation. Use when building AI agent systems, designing agent workflows, creating tool schemas, or evaluating agent…
borghei/Claude-Skills
Design AI agent communication protocols: MCP tool schemas, A2A, function calling, and inter- agent messaging. Use when building multi-agent systems, defining tool interfaces, or implementing agent-to-agent communication.
borghei/Claude-Skills
Design multi-agent orchestration with workflow DAGs, routing, handoff protocols, and state management. Use when building pipelines of specialized agents, designing fan-out/fan-in patterns, or implementing fault-tolerant…
borghei/Claude-Skills
Multi-agent DAG orchestration for workflows where AI agents collaborate via dependency graphs, covering agent spawning, output merging, and quality evaluation. Use when a task needs multiple specialized agents or to…
borghei/Claude-Skills
Analytics engineering across data modeling, dbt, transformation, and semantic layers. Use when building dbt models, designing star schemas, writing staging or mart SQL, configuring data tests, or optimizing warehouse…
Questions about Ciso Advisor
What does the Ciso Advisor skill do?
Is Ciso Advisor safe to install?
What can Ciso Advisor access on my machine?
How current is this page?
Sources
- github.com/borghei/Claude-Skills/tree/main/c-level-advisor/ciso- — the audited source at commit 6e3fcbdbb5cf and every finding aboveObserved · 19 Oct 2026
Spotted something wrong? Report a correction · Methodology
Keep going in your AI
Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.
- What does the Ciso Advisor skill do?
- Is Ciso Advisor safe to install?
- What can Ciso Advisor access on my machine?