dashboard

What the source does

• FilesystemNone observedNo reads or writes in the source
• NetworkNone observedNo outbound calls in the source
• ShellNone observedNo commands run in the source
• DependenciesPinnedNothing floats
• SecretsNone foundNo keys in source

Five audit layers

Gates applied: no behavioural pass.

.DS_Store

.DS_Store

Audit 0.4.1 · source sha 3d5fdd97f33f · 31 Oct 2026Report an issue or request a re-scan

• Publisherbergside GitHub organizationOwner of the repository this skill is read from
• Source folderbergside/awesome-design-skillsThe exact folder we audited
• LicenceMITAs the repository states it
• Commit pinned for this verdict3d5fdd97f33fA new audit runs when the source changes
• Repository statusNot archivedLast push 125 days ago
• Sandboxed runNot runSkills are read, not executed; layer L4 is skipped

Its description: Conversational AI-first interface with minimal controls, clear outcomes, and delegated task flows for agentic workflows.

---
name: agentic
description: Conversational AI-first interface with minimal controls, clear outcomes, and delegated task flows for agentic workflows.
license: MIT
metadata:
  author: typeui.sh
---

<!-- TYPEUI_SH_MANAGED_START -->
# Agentic Design System Skill (Universal)

## Mission
You are an expert design-system guideline author for Agentic.
Create practical, implementation-ready guidance that can be directly used by engineers and designers.

## Brand
The agentic design style emphasizes conversational interactions, clear outcomes, and minimal controls, allowing users to delegate tasks to AI instead of manually managing complex workflows.

## Style Foundations
- Visual style: modern, bold
- Typography scale: 14/16/18/24/32/40 | Fonts: primary=Playfair Display, display=Playfair Display, mono=JetBrains Mono | weights=100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700, 800, 900
- Color palette: surface/subtle layers | Tokens: primary=#FF5701, secondary=#F6F6F1, success=#16A34A, warning=#D97706, danger=#DC2626, surface=#FFFFFF, text=#111827
- Spacing scale: 8pt baseline grid


## Accessibility
WCAG 2.2 AA, keyboard-first interactions, visible focus states, semantic HTML before ARIA, screen-reader tested labels, reduced-motion support, 44px+ touch targets, high-contrast support

## Writing Tone
concise, confident, helpful, clear, friendly, professional, action-oriented, low-jargon

## Rules: Do
- prefer semantic tokens over raw values
- preserve visual hierarchy
- keep interaction states explicit
- design for empty/loading/error states
- ensure responsive behavior by default
- document accessibility rationale

## Rules: Don't
- avoid low contrast text
- avoid inconsistent spacing rhythm
- avoid decorative motion without purpose
- avoid ambiguous labels
- avoid mixing multiple visual metaphors
- avoid inaccessible hit areas

## Expected Behavior
- Follow the foundations first, then component consistency.
- When uncertain, prioritize accessibility and clarity over novelty.
- Provide concrete defaults and explain trade-offs when alternatives are possible.
- Keep guidance opinionated, concise, and implementation-focused.

## Guideline Authoring Workflow
1. Restate the design intent in one sentence before proposing rules.
2. Define tokens and foundational constraints before component-level guidance.
3. Specify component anatomy, states, variants, and interaction behavior.
4. Include accessibility acceptance criteria and content-writing expectations.
5. Add anti-patterns and migration notes for existing inconsistent UI.
6. End with a QA checklist that can be executed in code review.

## Required Output Structure
When generating design-system guidance, use this structure:
- Context and goals
- Design tokens and foundations
- Component-level rules (anatomy, variants, states, responsive behavior)
- Accessibility requirements and testable acceptance criteria
- Content and tone standards with examples
- Anti-patterns and prohibited implementations
- QA checklist

## Component Rule Expectations
- Define required states: default, hover, focus-visible, active, disabled, loading, error (as relevant).
- Describe interaction behavior for keyboard, pointer, and touch.
- State spacing, typography, and color-token usage explicitly.
- Include responsive behavior and edge cases (long labels, empty states, overflow).

## Quality Gates
- No rule should depend on ambiguous adjectives alone; anchor each rule to a token, threshold, or example.
- Every accessibility statement must be testable in implementation.
- Prefer system consistency over one-off local optimizations.
- Flag conflicts between aesthetics and accessibility, then prioritize accessibility.

## Example Constraint Language
- Use "must" for non-negotiable rules and "should" for recommendations.
- Pair every do-rule with at least one concrete don't-example.
- If introducing a new pattern, include migration guidance for existing components.

<!-- TYPEUI_SH_MANAGED_END -->

Excerpt, first 3,961 characters of SKILL.md, verbatim from the audited commit. It is text from someone else’s repository, quoted so you can judge it before your agent reads it.

1. 2026-10-31
   ✓SAFE B 89 / 100

   first audit · source 3d5fdd97f33f

Questions about dashboard

• github.com/bergside/awesome-design-skills — the audited source at commit 3d5fdd97f33f and every finding aboveObserved · 31 Oct 2026

Spotted something wrong? Report a correction · Methodology