Phoenix EvalsCAUTION
AI Observability & Evaluation
Overview
AI Observability & Evaluation
4aa9bd69dc69OBSERVED · 2026-10-21Install
Commands as the repository documents them. They are shown, not run.
pip install "arize-phoenix-client[pytest]>=2.10.0" pytest
pip install "arize-phoenix-client[pytest,evals]>=2.10.0" pytest
npm install -D @arizeai/phoenix-client@^6.11.1 @arizeai/phoenix-evals dotenv
pip install arize-phoenix
pip install arize-phoenix-client # Phoenix client only
pip install arize-phoenix-evals # Evaluation utilities
What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
--- name: phoenix-evals description: Build, run, and validate evaluators for AI/LLM applications with Phoenix, in Python or TypeScript (including Vercel AI SDK apps) — code-based checks and LLM-as-a-judge, run over exported traces or dataframes or as Phoenix experiments, gate them in CI, and validate judges against human-labeled data. license: Apache-2.0 compatibility: Requires Phoenix server. Python skills need phoenix and openai packages; TypeScript skills need @arizeai/phoenix-client. metadata: author: [email protected] version: "1.0.0" languages: "Python, TypeScript" --- # Phoenix Evals Build evaluators for AI/LLM applications. Code first, LLM for nuance, validate against humans. ## Quick Reference | Task | Files | | ---- | ----- | | Setup | [setup-python](references/setup-python.md), [setup-typescript](references/setup-typescript.md) | | Decide what to evaluate | [evaluators-overview](references/evaluators-overview.md) | | Choose a judge model | [fundamentals-model-selection](references/fundamentals-model-selection.md) | | Use pre-built evaluators | [evaluators-pre-built](references/evaluators-pre-built.md) | | Build code evaluator | [evaluators-code-python](references/evaluators-code-python.md), [evaluators-code-typescript](references/evaluators-code-typescript.md) | | Build LLM evaluator | [evaluators-llm-python](references/evaluators-llm-python.md), [evaluators-llm-typescript](references/evaluators-llm-typescript.md), [evaluators-custom-templates](references/evaluators-custom-templates.md) | | Batch evaluate DataFrame | [evaluate-dataframe-python](references/evaluate-dataframe-python.md) | | Run experiment | [experiments-running-python](references/experiments-running-python.md), [experiments-running-typescript](references/experiments-running-typescript.md) | | Run evals in a test runner (CI gate) | [integrations-pytest](references/integrations-pytest.md), [integrations-vitest-jest](references/integrations-vitest-jest.md) | | Create dataset | [experiments-datasets-python](references/experiments-datasets-python.md), [experiments-datasets-typescript](references/experiments-datasets-typescript.md) | | Generate synthetic data | [experiments-synthetic-python](references/experiments-synthetic-python.md), [experiments-synthetic-typescript](references/experiments-synthetic-typescript.md) | | Validate evaluator accuracy | [validation](references/validation.md), [validation-evaluators-python](references/validation-evaluators-python.md), [validation-evaluators-typescript](references/validation-evaluators-typescript.md) | | Export spans | [observe-tracing-setup](references/observe-tracing-setup.md) | | Write a span filter (`SpanQuery().where`) | [filter-expressions](references/filter-expressions.md) | | Sample traces for review | [observe-sampling-python](references/observe-sampling-python.md), [observe-sampling-typescript](references/observe-sampling-typescript.md) | | Analyze errors | [error-analysis](references/error-analysis.md), [error-analysis-multi-turn](references/error-analysis-multi-turn.md), [axial-coding](references/axial-coding.md) | | RAG evals | [evaluators-rag](references/evaluators-rag.md) | | Avoid common mistakes | [common-mistakes-python](references/common-mistakes-python.md), [fundamentals-anti-patterns](references/fundamentals-anti-patterns.md) | | Production | [production-overview](references/production-overview.md), [production-guardrails](references/production-guardrails.md), [production-continuous](references/production-continuous.md) | ## Workflows **Starting Fresh:** [observe-tracing-setup](references/observe-tracing-setup.md) → [error-analysis](references/error-analysis.md) → [axial-coding](references/axial-coding.md) → [evaluators-overview](references/evaluators-overview.md) **Building Evaluator:** [fundamentals](references/fundamentals.md) → [common-mistakes-python](references/common-mistakes-python.md) → evaluators-{code|llm}-{python|typescript} → validation-evaluators-{python|typescript} **RAG Systems:** [evaluators-rag](references/evaluators-rag.md) → evaluators-code-* (retrieval) → evaluators-llm-* (faithfulness) **Gating CI:** evaluators-{code|llm}-{python|typescript} → integrations-{pytest|vitest-jest} → [production-continuous](references/production-continuous.md) **Production:** [production-overview](references/production-overview.md) → [production-guardrails](references/production-guardrails.md) → [production-continuous](references/production-continuous.md) ## Reference Categories | Prefix | Description | | ------ | ----------- | | `fundamentals-*` | Types, scores, anti-patterns | | `observe-*` | Tracing, sampling | | `error-analysis-*` | Finding failures | | `axial-coding-*` | Categorizing failures | | `evaluators-*` | Code, LLM, RAG evaluators | | `experiments-*` | Datasets, running experiments | | `integrations-*` | Run evals from test runners (pytest, Vitest, Jest) as a CI gate | | `validation-*` | Validating evaluator accuracy against human labels | | `production-*` | CI/CD, monitoring | ## Key Principles | Principle | Action | | --------- | ------ | | Error analysis first | Can't automate what you haven't observed | | Custom > generic | Build from your failures | | Code first | Deterministic before LLM | | Validate judges | >80% accuracy, >70% TPR/TNR | | Binary > Likert | Pass/fail, not 1-5 | | Invariants gate, signals trend | `assert`/`expect` hard invariants (CI red); log LLM-judge quality signals and gate the aggregate (acceptance criteria), not every case |
Trust audit
CAUTIONgrade B · trust 89/100 Install with care. The audit found things worth knowing before you trust its output.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | WARN |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | NA |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (5)
.claude/skills
.codex/skills
.cursor/skills/mintlify
.cursor/skills/vercel-react-best-practices
CLAUDE.md
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
4aa9bd69dc69full audit observations/trust-audit/skill/arize-ai__phoenix-evals.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-21 | 4aa9bd69dc69 | CAUTION | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the phoenix-evals — arize-ai/phoenix skill do?
AI Observability & Evaluation
Is phoenix-evals — arize-ai/phoenix safe to install?
With care. The audit graded it B (89/100) and found 5 things worth knowing before you trust this skill, listed below with the exact line each was found on.
What can phoenix-evals — arize-ai/phoenix access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (4aa9bd69dc69), read on 2026-10-21. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.
Add this badge to your README
Shows this page's audit result and links back to it. It updates when the audit does.
[](https://modelsatlas.com/skills/arize-ai/phoenix-evals/)
Not your listing, or something out of date? Claim or update your listing.