deal-screening

What the source does

• FilesystemNone observedNo reads or writes in the source
• NetworkNone observedNo outbound calls in the source
• ShellNone observedNo commands run in the source
• DependenciesPinnedNothing floats
• SecretsNone foundNo keys in source

Five audit layers

Gates applied: no behavioural pass.

Audit 0.4.1 · source sha 06253c4f9534 · 28 Oct 2026Report an issue or request a re-scan

• Publisheranthropics GitHub organizationOwner of the repository this skill is read from
• Source folderanthropics/financial-services/plugins/vertical-plugins/private-equity/skills/deal-screeningThe exact folder we audited
• LicenceApache-2.0As the repository states it
• Commit pinned for this verdict06253c4f9534A new audit runs when the source changes
• Repository statusNot archivedLast push 36 days ago
• Sandboxed runNot runSkills are read, not executed; layer L4 is skipped

Its description: Quickly screen inbound deal flow — CIMs, teasers, and broker materials — against the fund's investment criteria. Extracts key deal metrics, runs a pass/fail framework, and outputs a one-page screening memo. Use when…

---
name: deal-screening
description: Quickly screen inbound deal flow — CIMs, teasers, and broker materials — against the fund's investment criteria. Extracts key deal metrics, runs a pass/fail framework, and outputs a one-page screening memo. Use when reviewing new deal flow, triaging inbound materials, or deciding whether to take a first call. Triggers on "screen this deal", "review this CIM", "should we look at this", "triage this teaser", or "deal screening".
---

# Deal Screening

## Workflow

### Step 1: Extract Deal Facts

From the provided CIM, teaser, or description, extract:

- **Company**: Name, location, sector/subsector
- **Description**: What they do (1-2 sentences)
- **Financials**: Revenue, EBITDA, margins, growth rate
- **Deal type**: Platform, add-on, recap, minority, carve-out
- **Asking price / valuation**: Multiple, enterprise value if stated
- **Seller motivation**: Why selling now
- **Management**: Rolling or exiting
- **Key customers**: Concentration risk
- **Key risks**: Obvious red flags

### Step 2: Screen Against Criteria

Apply the fund's investment criteria (ask user if not known):

| Criterion | Target | Actual | Pass/Fail |
|-----------|--------|--------|-----------|
| Revenue range | | | |
| EBITDA range | | | |
| EBITDA margin | | | |
| Growth profile | | | |
| Sector fit | | | |
| Geography | | | |
| Deal size / EV | | | |
| Valuation (x EBITDA) | | | |
| Customer concentration | | | |
| Management continuity | | | |

### Step 3: Quick Assessment

Provide a 3-part assessment:

1. **Verdict**: Pass / Further Diligence / Hard Pass
2. **Bull case** (2-3 bullets): Why this could be a good deal
3. **Bear case** (2-3 bullets): Key risks and concerns
4. **Key questions**: What you'd need to answer on a first call

### Step 4: Output

One-page screening memo suitable for sharing with partners or an IC quick screen.

## Important Notes

- Speed matters — screening should take minutes, not hours
- Be direct about red flags. Don't bury concerns
- If financials seem inconsistent or incomplete, flag it explicitly
- Ask for the fund's criteria upfront if this is the first screening
- Save screening criteria in memory for future deals once confirmed

Excerpt, first 2,208 characters of SKILL.md, verbatim from the audited commit. It is text from someone else’s repository, quoted so you can judge it before your agent reads it.

git clone https://github.com/anthropics/financial-services
git -C financial-services checkout 06253c4f9534

Works in

1. 2026-10-28
   ✓SAFE B 89 / 100

   first audit · source 06253c4f9534

Questions about deal-screening

• github.com/anthropics/financial-services/tree/main/plugins/verti — the audited source at commit 06253c4f9534 and every finding aboveObserved · 28 Oct 2026

Spotted something wrong? Report a correction · Methodology