Live survey304 models · 14 providers · 22,792 auditsAudited grill-with-docs · SAFE →What changedHow we verifyllms.txt

Agent skill · Audited from source

swarm-planner

skill · am-will/codex-skillsLicence not declaredAudited 31 Oct 2026 · source 31eb89d791f0

★ 1,041pushed 108 days ago
✓SAFEGrade B · 89/100 · 31 Oct 2026 · 31eb89d
1,041repo stars · whole am-will/codex-skills

Is it safe? Yes — SAFE, grade B (89/100). We read this skill's source at commit 31eb89d791f0 and found no filesystem, network or shell access and no hard-coded secrets. What it does: [EXPLICIT INVOCATION ONLY] Creates dependency-aware implementation plans optimized for parallel multi-agent execution.

Ask an AI about this pageGChatGPTCClaudePPerplexityGeGeminiXGrok
More
Cite

Cite this page

ModelsAtlas. “swarm-planner (am-will/codex-skills)”. Retrieved 31 Oct 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/skills/am-will/swarm-planner

Trust audit

Audit 0.4.1 · source read 31 Oct 2026

Trust score89/100✓SAFE B
0 critical0 high0 medium1 low0 info

SAFE means nothing in the source contradicts what the skill says it does. Grade B is shared by 16,667 of 17,602 audited skills.

What the source does

  • FilesystemNone observedNo reads or writes in the source
  • NetworkNone observedNo outbound calls in the source
  • ShellNone observedNo commands run in the source
  • DependenciesPinnedNothing floats
  • SecretsNone foundNo keys in source

Five audit layers

LayerWhat we checkResultFindings
L0 ProvenanceRepo owner, licence, archive status, activityPASS1
L1 Static sourceSecrets, path traversal, supply chain, hidden codeNA0
L2 InstructionsPrompt injection, authority framing, hidden directivesPASS0
L3 InventoryThe files and declarations match the sourcePASS0
L4 SandboxRun in isolation and watch behaviourSKIPPED why0

Gates applied: no behavioural pass, no license.

Findings (1)

LOWInventory / provenanceinv.no_license
F-13 Inventory / provenanceCWE-1104Layer L0
Why
no LICENSE file and no repo licence
Fix
add a licence

Audit 0.4.1 · source sha 31eb89d791f0 · 31 Oct 2026Report an issue or request a re-scan

Provenance

Who published it, and what the verdict is pinned to

  • Publisheram-will GitHub userOwner of the repository this skill is read from
  • Source folderam-will/codex-skills/skills/swarm-plannerThe exact folder we audited
  • LicenceNot declaredAs the repository states it
  • Commit pinned for this verdict31eb89d791f0A new audit runs when the source changes
  • Repository statusNot archivedLast push 108 days ago
  • Sandboxed runNot runSkills are read, not executed; layer L4 is skipped

What it tells the agent

Full source on GitHub ↗

Its description: [EXPLICIT INVOCATION ONLY] Creates dependency-aware implementation plans optimized for parallel multi-agent execution.

---
name: swarm-planner
description: >
  [EXPLICIT INVOCATION ONLY] Creates dependency-aware implementation plans optimized for parallel
  multi-agent execution.
metadata:
  invocation: explicit-only
---

# Swarm-Ready Planner

Create implementation plans with explicit task dependencies optimized for parallel agent execution. This skill can be ran inside or outside of Plan Mode. 

## Core Principles

1. **Explore Codebase**: Investigate architecture, patterns, existing implementations, dependencies, and frameworks in use.
2. **Fresh Documentation First**: Use Context7 for ANY external library, framework, or API before planning tasks
3. **Ask Questions**: Clarify ambiguities and seek clarification on scope, constraints, or priorities throughout the planning process. At any time.
4. **Explicit Dependencies**: Every task declares what it depends on, enabling maximum parallelization
5. **Atomic Tasks**: Each task is independently executable by a single agent
6. **Review Before Yield**: A subagent reviews the plan for gaps before finalizing

## Process

### 1. Research

**Codebase investigation:**
- Architecture, patterns, existing implementations
- Dependencies and frameworks in use

### 1a. Optional: Stop to Clarification Questions

- If the architecture is unclear or missing STOP AND YIELD to the user, and request user input (AskUserQuestions) before moving on. Always offer recommendations for clarification questions.
- If architecture is present, skip 1a and move onto next step. 

### 2. Documentation

**Documentation retrieval (REQUIRED for external dependencies):**

Use Context7 skill or MCP to fetch current docs for any libraries/frameworks or APIs that are or will be used in project. If Context7 is not available, use web search.

This ensures version-accurate APIs, correct parameters, and current best practices.

### 3. STOP and Request User Input

When anything is unclear or could reasonably be done multiple ways:
- Stop and ask clarifying questions immediately
- Do not make assumptions about scope, constraints, or priorities
- Questions should reduce risk and eliminate ambiguity
- Always offer recommendations for clarification questions.
- Use request_user_input or AskUserQuestion tool if available. 

### 4. Create Dependency-Aware Plan

Structure the plan with explicit task dependencies using this format:

#### Task Dependency Format

Each task MUST include:
- **id**: Unique identifier (e.g., `T1`, `T2.1`)
- **depends_on**: Array of task IDs that must complete first (empty `[]` for root tasks)
- **description**: What the task accomplishes
- **location**: File paths involved
- **validation**: acceptance criteria

**Example:**
```
T1: [depends_on: []] Create database schema migration
T2: [depends_on: []] Install required packages
T3: [depends_on: [T1]] Create repository layer
T4: [depends_on: [T1]] Create service interfaces
T5: [depends_on: [T3, T4]] Implement business logic
T6: [depends_on: [T2, T5]] Add API endpoints
T7: [depends_on: [T6]] Write integration tests
```

Tasks with empty/satisfied dependencies can run in parallel (T1, T2 above).

### 4. Save Plan

Save to `<topic>-plan.md` in the CWD.

### 5. Subagent Review

After saving, spawn a subagent to review the plan:

```
Review this implementation plan for:
1. Missing dependencies between tasks
2. Ordering issues that would cause failures
3. Missing error handling or edge cases
4. Gaps, holes, gotchas.

Provide specific, actionable feedback. Do not ask questions.

Plan location: [file path]
Context: [brief context about the task]
```

If the subagent provides actionable feedback, revise the plan before yielding.


## Plan Template

```markdown
# Plan: [Task Name]

**Generated**: [Date]

## Overview
[Summary of task and approach]

## Prerequisites
- [Tools, libraries, access needed]

## Dependency Graph

```
[Visual representation of task dependencies]
T1 ──┬── T3 ──┐
     │        ├── T5 ── T6 ── T7
T2 ──┴── T4 ──┘
```

## Tasks

### T1: [Name]
- **depends_on**: []
- **location**: [file paths]
- **description**: [what to do]
- **validation**: [how to verify]
- **status**: Not Completed
- **log**: [leave empty, to be filled out later]
- **files edited/created**: [leave empty, to be filled out later]

### T2: [Name]
- **depends_on**: []
- **location**: [file paths]
- **description**: [what to do]
- **validation**: [how to verify]
- **status**: Not Completed
- **log**: [leave empty, to be filled out later]
- **files edited/created**: [leave empty, to be filled out later]

### T3: [Name]
- **depends_on**: [T1]
- **location**: [file paths]
- **description**: [what to do]
- **validation**: [how to verify]
- **status**: Not Completed
- **log**: [leave empty, to be filled out later]
- **files edited/created**: [leave empty, to be filled out later]

[... continue for all tasks ...]

## Parallel Execution Groups

| Wave | Tasks | Can Start When |
|------|-------|----------------|
| 1 | T1, T2 | Immediately |
| 2 | T3, T4 | Wave 1 complete |
| 3 | T5 | T3, T4 complete |
| ... | ... | ... |

## Testing Strategy
- [How to test]
- [What to verify]

## Risks & Mitigations
- [What could go wrong + how to handle]
```

## Important

- Every task must have explicit `depends_on` field
- Root tasks (no dependencies) can be executed in parallel immediately
- Do NOT implement - only create the plan
- Always use Context7 for external dependencies before finalizing tasks
- Always ask questions where ambiguity exists

Excerpt, first 5,456 characters of SKILL.md, verbatim from the audited commit. It is text from someone else’s repository, quoted so you can judge it before your agent reads it.

Install

Pinned to the audited commit 31eb89d

Download folder ↗
git clone https://github.com/am-will/codex-skills
git -C codex-skills checkout 31eb89d791f0

The author documents no install command, so this uses the repository directly. Our verdict covers commit 31eb89d791f0 only.

Works in

The author has not said which agents this skill supports, and we have not tested it in any.

Audit history

Every audit, every source change

  1. ✓SAFE B 89 / 100

    first audit · source 31eb89d791f0

README badge

For maintainers · shows the latest audit

ModelsAtlas: SAFE BMODELSATLASSAFE · B
[![ModelsAtlas: SAFE B](https://modelsatlas.com/skills/am-will/swarm-planner/badge.svg)](https://modelsatlas.com/skills/am-will/swarm-planner/)

The badge shows our verdict and grade for this skill, and links back to this page. It changes when the audit does.

Similar skills

Add this badge to your README

[![ModelsAtlas: SAFE B](https://modelsatlas.com/skills/am-will/swarm-planner/badge.svg)](https://modelsatlas.com/skills/am-will/swarm-planner/)

Questions about swarm-planner

Is swarm-planner safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can swarm-planner access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (31eb89d791f0), read on 2026-10-31. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.

Sources

Spotted something wrong? Report a correction · Methodology

Keep going in your AI

Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.