Model RoutingSAFE
What started as an opinionated Claude Code setup kit is now an autonomous AI engineering command center
Overview
What started as an opinionated Claude Code setup kit is now an autonomous AI engineering command center
3a4a7596e97eOBSERVED · 2026-10-13Host compatibility
What the documentation claims. We have not run a compatibility test.
| Host | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| codex | mentioned |
What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
---
name: model-routing
description: 9-tier model routing system with cascading classifier fallback and result auto-evaluation
when-to-use: When configuring or debugging how prompts are classified and routed to the cheapest capable model
user-invocable: false
effort: medium
---
# Model Routing System
## How Routing Decisions Are Made
Every user prompt goes through a 9-tier classification pipeline before any AI model processes it. The system answers three questions:
1. **Which model should handle this?** — 9-tier cost/complexity classification
2. **Is the classifier itself working?** — Cascading fallback (qwen3 → kimi → deepseek → cache)
3. **Can we verify the result?** — Tool-level fallback + auto-evaluation
### The Pipeline
```
User types prompt
↓
UserPromptSubmit hook fires (~/.claude/hooks/route-task-hook)
↓
Classifier: qwen3 (local, free) classifies into tier
↓ (fails?)
Classifier: kimi (local, free) retries
↓ (fails?)
Classifier: deepseek-flash (~$0.0001) retries
↓ (fails?)
Classifier: cached tier from last success
↓
Hook injects routing decision into Claude's context
↓
Claude delegates to the right model or handles directly
```
## 9-Tier Routing Table
| Tier | Model | Input (per M) | Output (per M) | Handles |
|------|-------|---------------|----------------|---------|
| 0 | **Qwen3** (local) | $0 | $0 | grep, find, shell, syntax, log reading |
| 1 | **Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite** | $0.10 | $0.40 | Bulk extraction, classification, CIG pipelines |
| 2 | **DeepSeek V4 Flash** | $0.14 | $0.28 | Simple code, CRUD, test writing, small fixes |
| 3 | **DeepSeek V4 Pro** | $0.44 | $0.87 | Multi-file features, refactors, debugging (~80% of work) |
| 4 | **Gemini 2.5 Flash** | $0.15 | $0.60 | Multimodal (images, video, audio), brand analysis |
| 5 | **Kimi K2.6** | $0.60 | $2.50 | Code review, commit messages, diff summaries |
| 6 | **Gemini 3.1 Pro + Search** | $1.25 | $10.00 | Deep research, Google grounding, 2M context |
| 7 | **Codex** | varies | varies | Bulk generation, code review |
| 8 | **Claude Sonnet/Opus** | $3-5 | $15-25 | Architecture, security, quality-critical |
## Delegation Commands
When the hook says "delegate to X", run the matching command and return its output:
```bash
# Tier 0 — Qwen3
~/bin/qwen3 "prompt"
# Tier 1 — Gemini Flash-Lite
~/bin/gemini --flash-lite "prompt"
# Tier 2 — DeepSeek Flash
~/bin/deepseek --flash "prompt"
# Tier 3 — DeepSeek Pro
~/bin/deepseek --pro "prompt"
# Tier 4 — Gemini Flash
~/bin/gemini --flash "prompt"
# Tier 5 — Kimi
~/bin/kimi --quiet -p "prompt"
# Tier 6 — Gemini Pro Search
~/bin/gemini --pro-search "prompt"
# Tier 7 — Codex
codex exec "prompt"
# Tier 8 — Claude
# Handle directly (no delegation)
```
## Delegation Script Contract
Every `~/bin/` script follows the same pattern:
1. **Accepts prompt as argument**: `script "what is 2+2"`
2. **Model flags**: `--flash`, `--pro`, `--flash-lite`, `--pro-search`
3. **Quiet mode**: `--quiet` (where applicable)
4. **Output**: writes response to stdout, errors to stderr
5. **Exit codes**: 0 on success, non-zero on failure
### Available Scripts
```
~/bin/
├── qwen3 # Shell: curl to local Ollama API
├── kimi # Shell: execs Kimi CLI binary
├── deepseek # Python: httpx to DeepSeek Anthropic-compat API
├── gemini # Python: httpx to Gemini OpenAI-compat API
├── research # Python: multi-backend research with auto-evaluation
└── route-task # Shell: qwen3-powered task classification
```
## Classifier Fallback Chain
The classifier itself can fail. When it does, cascading fallback kicks in:
| Level | Classifier | Cost | Threshold |
|-------|-----------|------|-----------|
| 1 | **qwen3** (Ollama) | $0 | 2s connect, 8s classify |
| 2 | **kimi** CLI | $0 | Local process |
| 3 | **deepseek-flash** | ~$0.0001 | API call |
| 4 | **Cached tier** | $0 | From `~/.claude/routing-cache.json` |
The cache (`~/.claude/routing-cache.json`) saves the last successful tier and timestamp. After compaction, when Ollama may be briefly unreachable, the cache ensures routing continues without dropping to CLAUDE by default.
## Tool Fallback Protocol
When Claude's built-in tools fail, external backends take over:
| Failed Tool | Fallback 1 | Fallback 2 |
|-------------|------------|------------|
| **WebSearch** / **WebFetch** | `~/bin/research "query"` | `~/bin/deepseek --pro "query"` |
| **Read** / file access | `cat` via Bash | — |
| **Grep** | `grep -r` via Bash | — |
### Research Tool (`~/bin/research`)
Multi-backend research with auto-evaluation:
- Tries **deepseek-flash → deepseek-pro** in sequence
- Scores results 0-10 on content quality, structure, length
- Auto-adjusts preferred backend based on evaluation scores
- View stats: `~/bin/research --eval`
- Score log: `~/.claude/research-eval.jsonl`
## Maggy Integration
Maggy's `model_router.py` mirrors the same 9-tier structure in `DEFAULT_TIERS`. The `PiAdapter` uses the same delegation scripts for execution. Task type overrides in `routing_rules_defaults.py` ensure:
- `research`, `competitor` → **Gemini Pro Search** (Google grounding)
- `bulk` → **Gemini Flash-Lite** (cheapest)
- `security`, `architecture`, `planning` → **Claude** (quality-critical)
- `docs`, `tests` → **DeepSeek Pro** (cost-efficient)
- `review` → **Claude** (security + architecture depth)
## Environment
```bash
# Required for delegation scripts (in ~/.zshrc)
export DEEPSEEK_API_KEY="sk-..."
export GEMINI_API_KEY="..." # For gemini delegator
export OPENAI_API_KEY="sk-..." # For codex CLI
# Ollama must be running locally for qwen3
ollama serve # or launch at startup
```
## Observability
- **Routing log**: `~/.claude/routing-log.jsonl` — every classification with tier, classifier used, tokens saved
- **Routing cache**: `~/.claude/routing-cache.json` — last tier for post-compact recovery
- **Research eval**: `~/.claude/research-eval.jsonl` — per-query backend scoring
- **Maggy routing heatmap**: Dashboard → ModelTrust audit
SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | NA |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (0)
No findings outside the package's declared scope.
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
3a4a7596e97efull audit observations/trust-audit/skill/alinaqi__model-routing.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-13 | 3a4a7596e97e | SAFE | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Model Routing skill do?
What started as an opinionated Claude Code setup kit is now an autonomous AI engineering command center
Is Model Routing safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Model Routing access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
Which assistants does Model Routing work with?
Its documentation mentions codex. That is what the text claims, not a compatibility test we ran.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (3a4a7596e97e), read on 2026-10-13. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.