Atlas / Skills / alinaqi / Cross Agent Delegation

Cross Agent DelegationSAFE

skills/alinaqi/cross-agent-delegation

What started as an opinionated Claude Code setup kit is now an autonomous AI engineering command center

Verdict
SAFE
Grade
B
Trust score
89 /100
Version
—
Hosts
2 documented
License
MIT
Stars
707
01

Overview

What started as an opinionated Claude Code setup kit is now an autonomous AI engineering command center

Read from source at commit 3a4a7596e97eOBSERVED · 2026-10-13
02

Host compatibility

What the documentation claims. We have not run a compatibility test.

HostStatusNotes
claude-codementioned
codexmentioned
03

What it tells the agent

The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.

---
name: cross-agent-delegation
description: Cross-agent task routing — Codex auto-review, Kimi delegation by complexity score (iCPG + Claude reasoning), iCPG + Mnemos mandatory for all agents
when-to-use: Always loaded when multiple AI CLI tools are available (Claude, Kimi, Codex)
user-invocable: false
effort: medium
---

# Cross-Agent Delegation

Claude Code orchestrates task routing to Kimi and Codex. The user interacts with Claude only — delegation happens behind the scenes.

---

## Tool Detection

At session start, detect available tools:

```bash
command -v kimi &>/dev/null && HAS_KIMI=true || HAS_KIMI=false
command -v codex &>/dev/null && HAS_CODEX=true || HAS_CODEX=false
```

---

## Codex Auto-Review (Stop Hook — Automatic)

When Codex is installed, a Stop hook reviews code after tests pass:

1. TDD loop check runs tests
2. `codex-auto-review.sh` runs Codex on the diff
3. Critical/High findings feed back to Claude (exit 2)
4. Clean reviews pass through (exit 0)

**Fully automatic.** No user or Claude action needed.

---

## Kimi Delegation (Claude Orchestrates)

When Kimi is installed and the task complexity is bounded, Claude delegates directly — the user does not need to run anything.

### Step 1: Score complexity, not file count

File count is a poor proxy for delegation risk. A 1-file change to an authz path is harder than a 12-file rename. Score the task on five dimensions, each 0-2, sourced from iCPG signals plus Claude's semantic reasoning:

| Dimension | 0 (low) | 1 (medium) | 2 (high) | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| **Cyclomatic / surface depth** | <10 LOC, no branches | 10-50 LOC, ≤3 branches | 50+ LOC or nested control flow | iCPG `query_graph` over function bodies |
| **Fan-out (consumer blast radius)** | 0-2 callers | 3-10 callers | 11+ callers | iCPG `trace_path(<symbol>, mode=callers)` |
| **Crosses a security boundary** (SEC-006, auth, PII, RLS, org-scope, billing, payments) | None | Tangential | Direct read or write | iCPG SEC-* / R-063 tags + grep for `org_id`, `user_id`, `auth`, `pii` |
| **Concurrency / transactional** | Pure / sync | Async only | Locks, transactions, atomic claims, `FOR UPDATE`, `asyncio.Lock`, `session.begin` | iCPG concurrency flags + grep |
| **Domain invariants required** | None / well-documented inline | Some implicit (need to read 1-2 files) | Heavy (cross-doc, ADR-bound, RFC-bound) | Claude reasoning + iCPG ADR linkage |

```bash
# Auto-collect signals
icpg query blast <scope> --format json    # fan-out, async flags, sec tags
grep -rE "org_id|user_id|auth|pii"  <file>  # cheap sec heuristic if iCPG flags absent
grep -rE "asyncio.Lock|FOR UPDATE|session.begin" <file>  # concurrency heuristic
```

### Step 2: Sum → routing

| Total score | Route | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| **0-3** | Kimi solo | Bounded surface, no security/concurrency/cross-doc concerns |
| **4-6** | Kimi → Codex auto-review (no user prompt) | Real risk, but not so high that we need full Claude context — Codex catches what Kimi might miss |
| **7-10** | Claude handles directly | Cross-cutting / security-critical / concurrency-heavy — needs full context |

### Step 3: Floor — trivial-case shortcut

To skip iCPG-query cost on truly trivial work:

```bash
# If <2 files changed AND no SEC/auth/PII/concurrency keyword in diff,
# → auto-Kimi without scoring.
FILES=$(git diff --name-only | wc -l)
HAS_RISK_KEYWORDS=$(git diff | grep -ciE "org_id|auth|pii|asyncio|FOR UPDATE|transaction|session\.begin" || true)
if [ "$FILES" -lt 2 ] && [ "$HAS_RISK_KEYWORDS" -eq 0 ]; then
  AUTO_KIMI=true
fi
```

This handles the trivial-rename / typo-fix case without paying the iCPG round-trip.

### When NOT to Delegate (overrides scoring)

- User explicitly asked Claude to do it
- Cross-service changes (API + frontend + database) — needs full context regardless of score
- Production hotfix on a release branch — cross-tool review latency is too high
- Score 7+ in any single dimension (one critical axis is enough to keep Claude in the loop)

### Step 4: Delegate via Bash

Claude writes a mnemos checkpoint, then runs Kimi headless:

```bash
# 1. Save current context to disk
mnemos checkpoint --force

# 2. Get context summary for Kimi
CONTEXT=$(mnemos resume 2>/dev/null)

# 3. Get constraints for target files
CONSTRAINTS=$(icpg query constraints <target-file> 2>/dev/null)

# 4. Run Kimi headless with full context
kimi --print -y -w . -p "
## Context (from mnemos checkpoint)
$CONTEXT

## Constraints (from iCPG)
$CONSTRAINTS

## Task
<specific task description>

## Rules
- Run tests after changes
- Record changes: icpg record --base main
- Write checkpoint when done: mnemos checkpoint --force
"
```

### Step 4: Read Results

After Kimi finishes, Claude:

```bash
# Read what Kimi did
mnemos resume          # Kimi's checkpoint
icpg status            # Kimi's recorded symbols
git diff               # Kimi's file changes
```

### When NOT to Delegate

- Security-sensitive code (auth, crypto, payments)
- Cross-service changes (API + frontend + database)
- Refactors that touch shared interfaces
- User explicitly asked Claude to do it

---

## iCPG — Mandatory for All Agents

Before ANY code change, Claude runs these (and includes results when delegating):

### Pre-Task Queries

```bash
# 1. Duplicate check — already done?
icpg query prior "<goal>"

# 2. Constraints — what invariants apply?
icpg query constraints <file-path>

# 3. Risk — is this symbol fragile?
icpg query risk <symbol-name>
```

### After Code Changes

```bash
icpg record --reason <id> --base main
icpg drift check
```

---

## Mnemos — Mandatory for All Agents

### At Task Start

```bash
mnemos add goal "<task description>"
```

### At Sub-Goal Boundaries

```bash
mnemos checkpoint
```

### At Task End (auto-handled by Stop hook)

```bash
mnemos checkpoint --force
```

### Context Transfer Between Tools

The checkpoint is the bridge. Claude writes it, Kimi reads it:

```bash
# Claude saves state
mnemos checkpoint --force

# Kimi (or 
04

Trust audit

SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.

LayerWhat it checksResult
L0Provenance & inventoryPASS
L1Static analysis of the codeNA
L2Instruction surface (what it tells the agent)PASS
L3Class-specific surfacePASS
L4Behavioural (sandbox)SKIPPED

What the source does

Filesystem
none-observed
Network
none-observed
Shell
none-observed
Dependencies
pinned
Secrets in source
none-found

Findings (0)

No findings outside the package's declared scope.

Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.

Audited 2026-10-13 · audit v0.4.1 · source sha 3a4a7596e97efull audit observations/trust-audit/skill/alinaqi__cross-agent-delegation.json · Report an issue / request a re-scan
05

Audit history

Every audit this skill has had.

DateSourceVerdictGradeScoreChange
2026-10-133a4a7596e97eSAFEB89first audit
06

Questions

What does the Cross Agent Delegation skill do?

What started as an opinionated Claude Code setup kit is now an autonomous AI engineering command center

Is Cross Agent Delegation safe to install?

The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.

What can Cross Agent Delegation access on my machine?

The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.

Which assistants does Cross Agent Delegation work with?

Its documentation mentions claude-code and codex. That is what the text claims, not a compatibility test we ran.

How current is this page?

The grade is for one exact copy of the source (3a4a7596e97e), read on 2026-10-13. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.

Advertisement