Agent skill · Audited from source

Base

skill · alinaqi/claude-bootstrapMIT licenceAudited 14 Oct 2026 · source ea59a0c53d79

★ 707pushed today
✓SAFEGrade B · 89/100 · 14 Oct 2026 · ea59a0c
707repo stars · whole alinaqi/claude-bootstrap

Is it safe? Yes — SAFE, grade B (89/100). We read this skill's source at commit ea59a0c53d79 and found no filesystem, network or shell access and no hard-coded secrets. What it does: Universal coding patterns, constraints, TDD workflow, atomic todos

Ask an AI about this pageGChatGPTCClaudePPerplexityGeGeminiXGrok
More
Cite

Cite this page

ModelsAtlas. “Base (alinaqi/claude-bootstrap)”. Retrieved 14 Oct 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/skills/alinaqi/base

2 skills are called “Base”. You are viewing alinaqi/claude-bootstrap.

Trust audit

Audit 0.4.1 · source read 14 Oct 2026

Trust score89/100✓SAFE B
0 critical0 high0 medium0 low0 info

SAFE means nothing in the source contradicts what the skill says it does. Grade B is shared by 13,985 of 14,816 audited skills.

What the source does

  • FilesystemNone observedNo reads or writes in the source
  • NetworkNone observedNo outbound calls in the source
  • ShellNone observedNo commands run in the source
  • DependenciesPinnedNothing floats
  • SecretsNone foundNo keys in source

Five audit layers

LayerWhat we checkResultFindings
L0 ProvenanceRepo owner, licence, archive status, activityPASS0
L1 Static sourceSecrets, path traversal, supply chain, hidden codeNA0
L2 InstructionsPrompt injection, authority framing, hidden directivesPASS0
L3 InventoryThe files and declarations match the sourcePASS0
L4 SandboxRun in isolation and watch behaviourSKIPPED why0

Gates applied: no behavioural pass.

Findings (0)

No findings at any severity. We re-audit when the source changes.

Audit 0.4.1 · source sha ea59a0c53d79 · 14 Oct 2026Report an issue or request a re-scan

Provenance

Who published it, and what the verdict is pinned to

  • Publisheralinaqi GitHub userOwner of the repository this skill is read from
  • Source folderalinaqi/claude-bootstrap/skills/baseThe exact folder we audited
  • LicenceMITAs the repository states it
  • Commit pinned for this verdictea59a0c53d79A new audit runs when the source changes
  • Repository statusNot archivedPushed today
  • Sandboxed runNot runSkills are read, not executed; layer L4 is skipped

What it tells the agent

Full source on GitHub ↗

Its description: Universal coding patterns, constraints, TDD workflow, atomic todos

---
name: base
description: Universal coding patterns, constraints, TDD workflow, atomic todos
when-to-use: Always loaded as foundation for all projects - TDD workflow, simplicity rules, atomic todos
user-invocable: false
effort: medium
---

# Base Skill - Universal Patterns

## Core Principle

Complexity is the enemy. Every line of code is a liability. The goal is software simple enough that any engineer (or AI) can understand the entire system in one session.

---

## Simplicity Rules

These limits apply to every file created or modified.

### Function Level
- **Maximum 20 lines per function** - if longer, decompose IMMEDIATELY
- **Maximum 3 parameters per function** - if more, use an options object or decompose
- **Maximum 2 levels of nesting** - flatten with early returns or extract functions
- **Single responsibility** - each function does exactly one thing
- **Descriptive names over comments** - if you need a comment to explain what, rename it

### File Level
- **Maximum 200 lines per file** - if longer, split by responsibility BEFORE continuing
- **Maximum 10 functions per file** - keeps cognitive load manageable
- **One export focus per file** - a file should have one primary purpose

### Module Level
- **Maximum 3 levels of directory nesting** - flat is better than nested
- **Clear boundaries** - each module has a single public interface
- **No circular dependencies** - ever

### Enforcement Protocol

**Before completing ANY file:**
1. Count total lines - if > 200, STOP and split
2. Count functions - if > 10, STOP and split
3. Check each function length - if any > 20 lines, STOP and decompose
4. Check parameter counts - if any > 3, STOP and refactor

**If limits are exceeded during development:**
```
⚠️ FILE SIZE VIOLATION DETECTED

[filename] has [X] lines (limit: 200)

Splitting into:
- [filename-a].ts - [responsibility A]
- [filename-b].ts - [responsibility B]
```

**Never defer refactoring.** Fix violations immediately, not "later".

---

## Architectural Patterns

### Functional Core, Imperative Shell
- Pure functions for business logic - no side effects, deterministic
- Side effects only at boundaries - API calls, database, file system at edges
- Data in, data out - functions transform data, they don't mutate state

### Composition Over Inheritance
- No inheritance deeper than 1 level - prefer interfaces/composition
- Small, composable utilities - build complex from simple
- Dependency injection - pass dependencies, don't import them directly

### Error Handling
- Fail fast, fail loud - errors surface immediately
- No silent failures - every error is logged or thrown
- Design APIs where misuse is impossible

---

## Testing Philosophy

- **100% coverage on business logic** - the functional core
- **Integration tests for boundaries** - API endpoints, database operations
- **No untested code merges** - CI blocks without passing tests
- **Test behavior, not implementation** - tests survive refactoring
- **Each test runs in isolation** - no interdependence

---

## Anti-Patterns (Never Do This)

- ❌ Global state
- ❌ Magic numbers/strings - use named constants
- ❌ Deep nesting - flatten or extract
- ❌ Long parameter lists - use objects
- ❌ Comments explaining "what" - code should be self-documenting
- ❌ Dead code - delete it, git remembers
- ❌ Copy-paste duplication - extract to shared function
- ❌ God objects/files - split by responsibility
- ❌ Circular dependencies
- ❌ Premature optimization
- ❌ Large PRs - small, focused changes only
- ❌ Mixing refactoring with features - separate commits

---

## Documentation Structure

Every project must have clear separation between code docs and project specs:

```
project/
├── docs/                      # Code documentation
│   ├── architecture.md        # System design decisions
│   ├── api.md                 # API reference (if applicable)
│   └── setup.md               # Development setup guide
├── _project_specs/            # Project specifications
│   ├── overview.md            # Project vision and goals
│   ├── features/              # Feature specifications
│   │   ├── feature-a.md
│   │   └── feature-b.md
│   ├── todos/                 # Atomic todos tracking
│   │   ├── active.md          # Current sprint/focus
│   │   ├── backlog.md         # Future work
│   │   └── completed.md       # Done items (for reference)
│   ├── session/               # Session state (see session-management.md)
│   │   ├── current-state.md   # Live session state
│   │   ├── decisions.md       # Key decisions log
│   │   ├── code-landmarks.md  # Important code locations
│   │   └── archive/           # Past session summaries
│   └── prompts/               # LLM prompt specifications (if AI-first)
└── CLAUDE.md                  # Claude instructions (references skills)
```

### What Goes Where

| Location | Content |
|----------|---------|
| `docs/` | Technical documentation, API refs, setup guides |
| `_project_specs/` | Business logic, features, requirements, todos |
| `_project_specs/session/` | Session state, decisions, context for resumability |
| `CLAUDE.md` | Claude-specific instructions and skill references |

---

## Atomic Todos

All work is tracked as atomic todos with validation and test criteria.

### Todo Format (Required)
```markdown
## [TODO-001] Short descriptive title

**Status:** pending | in-progress | blocked | done
**Priority:** high | medium | low
**Estimate:** XS | S | M | L | XL

### Description
One paragraph describing what needs to be done.

### Acceptance Criteria
- [ ] Criterion 1 - specific, measurable
- [ ] Criterion 2 - specific, measurable

### Validation
How to verify this is complete:
- Manual: [steps to manually test]
- Automated: [test file/command that validates this]

### Test Cases
| Input | Expected Output | Notes |
|-------|-----------------|-------|
| ... | ... | ... |

### Dependencies
- Depends on: [TODO-xxx] (if any)
- Blocks: [TODO-yyy] (if any)

### TDD Execution Log
| Phase | Command | Result | Timestamp

Excerpt, first 6,000 characters of SKILL.md, verbatim from the audited commit. It is text from someone else’s repository, quoted so you can judge it before your agent reads it.

Install

Pinned to the audited commit ea59a0c

Download folder ↗
git clone https://github.com/alinaqi/claude-bootstrap
git -C claude-bootstrap checkout ea59a0c53d79

The author documents no install command, so this uses the repository directly. Our verdict covers commit ea59a0c53d79 only.

Works in

The author has not said which agents this skill supports, and we have not tested it in any.

Audit history

Every audit, every source change

  1. ✓SAFE B 89 / 100

    first audit · source ea59a0c53d79

Questions about Base

What does the Base skill do?
What started as an opinionated Claude Code setup kit is now an autonomous AI engineering command center
Is Base safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Base access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (ea59a0c53d79), read on 2026-10-14. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.

Sources

Spotted something wrong? Report a correction · Methodology

Keep going in your AI

Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.