Agent skill · Audited from source
Base
skill · alinaqi/claude-bootstrapMIT licenceAudited 14 Oct 2026 · source ea59a0c53d79
Is it safe? Yes — SAFE, grade B (89/100). We read this skill's source at commit ea59a0c53d79 and found no filesystem, network or shell access and no hard-coded secrets. What it does: Universal coding patterns, constraints, TDD workflow, atomic todos
Cite
Cite this page
ModelsAtlas. “Base (alinaqi/claude-bootstrap)”. Retrieved 14 Oct 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/skills/alinaqi/base
2 skills are called “Base”. You are viewing alinaqi/claude-bootstrap.
- alinaqi/claude-bootstrap★ 707✓SAFE
- BankrBot/skills★ 1.2k✓SAFE
Trust audit
Audit 0.4.1 · source read 14 Oct 2026
SAFE means nothing in the source contradicts what the skill says it does. Grade B is shared by 13,985 of 14,816 audited skills.
What the source does
- FilesystemNone observedNo reads or writes in the source
- NetworkNone observedNo outbound calls in the source
- ShellNone observedNo commands run in the source
- DependenciesPinnedNothing floats
- SecretsNone foundNo keys in source
Five audit layers
| Layer | What we check | Result | Findings |
|---|---|---|---|
L0 Provenance | Repo owner, licence, archive status, activity | PASS | 0 |
L1 Static source | Secrets, path traversal, supply chain, hidden code | NA | 0 |
L2 Instructions | Prompt injection, authority framing, hidden directives | PASS | 0 |
L3 Inventory | The files and declarations match the source | PASS | 0 |
L4 Sandbox | Run in isolation and watch behaviour | SKIPPED why | 0 |
Gates applied: no behavioural pass.
Findings (0)
No findings at any severity. We re-audit when the source changes.
Audit 0.4.1 · source sha ea59a0c53d79 · 14 Oct 2026Report an issue or request a re-scan
Provenance
Who published it, and what the verdict is pinned to
- Publisheralinaqi GitHub userOwner of the repository this skill is read from
- Source folderalinaqi/claude-bootstrap/skills/baseThe exact folder we audited
- LicenceMITAs the repository states it
- Commit pinned for this verdictea59a0c53d79A new audit runs when the source changes
- Repository statusNot archivedPushed today
- Sandboxed runNot runSkills are read, not executed; layer L4 is skipped
What it tells the agent
Full source on GitHub ↗Its description: Universal coding patterns, constraints, TDD workflow, atomic todos
--- name: base description: Universal coding patterns, constraints, TDD workflow, atomic todos when-to-use: Always loaded as foundation for all projects - TDD workflow, simplicity rules, atomic todos user-invocable: false effort: medium --- # Base Skill - Universal Patterns ## Core Principle Complexity is the enemy. Every line of code is a liability. The goal is software simple enough that any engineer (or AI) can understand the entire system in one session. --- ## Simplicity Rules These limits apply to every file created or modified. ### Function Level - **Maximum 20 lines per function** - if longer, decompose IMMEDIATELY - **Maximum 3 parameters per function** - if more, use an options object or decompose - **Maximum 2 levels of nesting** - flatten with early returns or extract functions - **Single responsibility** - each function does exactly one thing - **Descriptive names over comments** - if you need a comment to explain what, rename it ### File Level - **Maximum 200 lines per file** - if longer, split by responsibility BEFORE continuing - **Maximum 10 functions per file** - keeps cognitive load manageable - **One export focus per file** - a file should have one primary purpose ### Module Level - **Maximum 3 levels of directory nesting** - flat is better than nested - **Clear boundaries** - each module has a single public interface - **No circular dependencies** - ever ### Enforcement Protocol **Before completing ANY file:** 1. Count total lines - if > 200, STOP and split 2. Count functions - if > 10, STOP and split 3. Check each function length - if any > 20 lines, STOP and decompose 4. Check parameter counts - if any > 3, STOP and refactor **If limits are exceeded during development:** ``` ⚠️ FILE SIZE VIOLATION DETECTED [filename] has [X] lines (limit: 200) Splitting into: - [filename-a].ts - [responsibility A] - [filename-b].ts - [responsibility B] ``` **Never defer refactoring.** Fix violations immediately, not "later". --- ## Architectural Patterns ### Functional Core, Imperative Shell - Pure functions for business logic - no side effects, deterministic - Side effects only at boundaries - API calls, database, file system at edges - Data in, data out - functions transform data, they don't mutate state ### Composition Over Inheritance - No inheritance deeper than 1 level - prefer interfaces/composition - Small, composable utilities - build complex from simple - Dependency injection - pass dependencies, don't import them directly ### Error Handling - Fail fast, fail loud - errors surface immediately - No silent failures - every error is logged or thrown - Design APIs where misuse is impossible --- ## Testing Philosophy - **100% coverage on business logic** - the functional core - **Integration tests for boundaries** - API endpoints, database operations - **No untested code merges** - CI blocks without passing tests - **Test behavior, not implementation** - tests survive refactoring - **Each test runs in isolation** - no interdependence --- ## Anti-Patterns (Never Do This) - ❌ Global state - ❌ Magic numbers/strings - use named constants - ❌ Deep nesting - flatten or extract - ❌ Long parameter lists - use objects - ❌ Comments explaining "what" - code should be self-documenting - ❌ Dead code - delete it, git remembers - ❌ Copy-paste duplication - extract to shared function - ❌ God objects/files - split by responsibility - ❌ Circular dependencies - ❌ Premature optimization - ❌ Large PRs - small, focused changes only - ❌ Mixing refactoring with features - separate commits --- ## Documentation Structure Every project must have clear separation between code docs and project specs: ``` project/ ├── docs/ # Code documentation │ ├── architecture.md # System design decisions │ ├── api.md # API reference (if applicable) │ └── setup.md # Development setup guide ├── _project_specs/ # Project specifications │ ├── overview.md # Project vision and goals │ ├── features/ # Feature specifications │ │ ├── feature-a.md │ │ └── feature-b.md │ ├── todos/ # Atomic todos tracking │ │ ├── active.md # Current sprint/focus │ │ ├── backlog.md # Future work │ │ └── completed.md # Done items (for reference) │ ├── session/ # Session state (see session-management.md) │ │ ├── current-state.md # Live session state │ │ ├── decisions.md # Key decisions log │ │ ├── code-landmarks.md # Important code locations │ │ └── archive/ # Past session summaries │ └── prompts/ # LLM prompt specifications (if AI-first) └── CLAUDE.md # Claude instructions (references skills) ``` ### What Goes Where | Location | Content | |----------|---------| | `docs/` | Technical documentation, API refs, setup guides | | `_project_specs/` | Business logic, features, requirements, todos | | `_project_specs/session/` | Session state, decisions, context for resumability | | `CLAUDE.md` | Claude-specific instructions and skill references | --- ## Atomic Todos All work is tracked as atomic todos with validation and test criteria. ### Todo Format (Required) ```markdown ## [TODO-001] Short descriptive title **Status:** pending | in-progress | blocked | done **Priority:** high | medium | low **Estimate:** XS | S | M | L | XL ### Description One paragraph describing what needs to be done. ### Acceptance Criteria - [ ] Criterion 1 - specific, measurable - [ ] Criterion 2 - specific, measurable ### Validation How to verify this is complete: - Manual: [steps to manually test] - Automated: [test file/command that validates this] ### Test Cases | Input | Expected Output | Notes | |-------|-----------------|-------| | ... | ... | ... | ### Dependencies - Depends on: [TODO-xxx] (if any) - Blocks: [TODO-yyy] (if any) ### TDD Execution Log | Phase | Command | Result | Timestamp
Excerpt, first 6,000 characters of SKILL.md, verbatim from the audited commit. It is text from someone else’s repository, quoted so you can judge it before your agent reads it.
Install
Pinned to the audited commit ea59a0c
git clone https://github.com/alinaqi/claude-bootstrap git -C claude-bootstrap checkout ea59a0c53d79
The author documents no install command, so this uses the repository directly. Our verdict covers commit ea59a0c53d79 only.
Works in
The author has not said which agents this skill supports, and we have not tested it in any.
Audit history
Every audit, every source change
- ✓SAFE B 89 / 100
first audit · source
ea59a0c53d79
Similar skills
All coding & review skills →alinaqi/claude-bootstrap
AI Engine Optimization - semantic triples, page templates, content clusters for AI citations
alinaqi/maggy
Claude Code Agent Teams - default team-based development with strict TDD pipeline enforcement
alinaqi/claude-bootstrap
Build AI agents with Pydantic AI (Python) and Claude SDK (Node.js)
alinaqi/claude-bootstrap
Latest AI models reference - Claude, OpenAI, Gemini, Eleven Labs, Replicate
alinaqi/claude-bootstrap
Android Java development with MVVM, ViewBinding, and Espresso testing
alinaqi/claude-bootstrap
Android Kotlin development with Coroutines, Jetpack Compose, Hilt, and MockK testing
Questions about Base
What does the Base skill do?
Is Base safe to install?
What can Base access on my machine?
How current is this page?
Sources
- github.com/alinaqi/claude-bootstrap/tree/main/skills/base — the audited source at commit ea59a0c53d79 and every finding aboveObserved · 14 Oct 2026
Spotted something wrong? Report a correction · Methodology
Keep going in your AI
Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.
- What does the Base skill do?
- Is Base safe to install?
- What can Base access on my machine?