Article WritingSAFE
The agent harness performance optimization system. Skills, instincts, memory, security, and research-first development for Claude Code, Codex, Opencode, Cursor and beyond.
Overview
The agent harness performance optimization system. Skills, instincts, memory, security, and research-first development for Claude Code, Codex, Opencode, Cursor and beyond.
e9ca581a4f44OBSERVED · 2026-09-19What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
--- name: article-writing description: Write articles, guides, blog posts, tutorials, newsletter issues, and other long-form content in a distinctive voice derived from supplied examples or brand guidance. Use when the user wants polished written content longer than a paragraph, especially when voice consistency, structure, and credibility matter. origin: ECC --- # Article Writing Write long-form content that sounds like a real person or brand, not generic AI output. ## When to Activate - drafting blog posts, essays, launch posts, guides, tutorials, or newsletter issues - turning notes, transcripts, or research into polished articles - matching an existing founder, operator, or brand voice from examples - tightening structure, pacing, and evidence in already-written long-form copy ## Core Rules 1. Lead with the concrete thing: example, output, anecdote, number, screenshot description, or code block. 2. Explain after the example, not before. 3. Prefer short, direct sentences over padded ones. 4. Use specific numbers when available and sourced. 5. Never invent biographical facts, company metrics, or customer evidence. ## Voice Capture Workflow If the user wants a specific voice, collect one or more of: - published articles - newsletters - X / LinkedIn posts - docs or memos - a short style guide Then extract: - sentence length and rhythm - whether the voice is formal, conversational, or sharp - favored rhetorical devices such as parentheses, lists, fragments, or questions - tolerance for humor, opinion, and contrarian framing - formatting habits such as headers, bullets, code blocks, and pull quotes If no voice references are given, default to a direct, operator-style voice: concrete, practical, and low on hype. ## Banned Patterns Delete and rewrite any of these: - generic openings like "In today's rapidly evolving landscape" - filler transitions such as "Moreover" and "Furthermore" - hype phrases like "game-changer", "cutting-edge", or "revolutionary" - vague claims without evidence - biography or credibility claims not backed by provided context ## Writing Process 1. Clarify the audience and purpose. 2. Build a skeletal outline with one purpose per section. 3. Start each section with evidence, example, or scene. 4. Expand only where the next sentence earns its place. 5. Remove anything that sounds templated or self-congratulatory. ## Structure Guidance ### Technical Guides - open with what the reader gets - use code or terminal examples in every major section - end with concrete takeaways, not a soft summary ### Essays / Opinion Pieces - start with tension, contradiction, or a sharp observation - keep one argument thread per section - use examples that earn the opinion ### Newsletters - keep the first screen strong - mix insight with updates, not diary filler - use clear section labels and easy skim structure ## Quality Gate Before delivering: - verify factual claims against provided sources - remove filler and corporate language - confirm the voice matches the supplied examples - ensure every section adds new information - check formatting for the intended platform
Trust audit
SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | NA |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (0)
No findings outside the package's declared scope.
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
e9ca581a4f44full audit observations/trust-audit/skill/affaan-m__article-writing.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-19 | e9ca581a4f44 | SAFE | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Article Writing skill do?
The agent harness performance optimization system. Skills, instincts, memory, security, and research-first development for Claude Code, Codex, Opencode, Cursor and beyond.
Is Article Writing safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Article Writing access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (e9ca581a4f44), read on 2026-09-19. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.