Publisher · GitHub organization

trailhq

github.com/trailhq ↗Last audit 23 Oct 2026

trailhq publishes 3 MCP servers on the atlas: 0 SAFE, 2 CAUTION, 1 BLOCK, with a mean score of 75/100. Every listing below is audited on its own.
Ask an AI about this pageGChatGPTCClaudePPerplexityGeGeminiXGrok
More
Cite

Cite this page

ModelsAtlas. “trailhq: skills and MCP servers”. Retrieved 23 Oct 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/orgs/trailhq
Listings
3

3 MCP servers · 0 skills

Mean score
75 / 100

mean of the audit scores

Findings
57

across all listings

Stars
28K

on the listed repositories

SAFE 0CAUTION 2BLOCK 1

Everything trailhq publishes here

Most stars first · stamps show the audited version

Trail-Codetrailhq/Trail-Code
MCP ★ 11K
✕BLOCKF · 47 · 23 Oct 2026
Grafttrailhq/graft
MCP ★ 8.8K
!CAUTIONB · 89 · 21 Sep 2026
Grafttrailhq/Graft
MCP ★ 8.8K
!CAUTIONB · 89 · 21 Sep 2026

Questions

Are trailhq's MCP servers safe to install?
Of 3 listings, 0 are SAFE, 2 CAUTION and 1 BLOCK, with a mean score of 75 out of 100. That is an average over separate audits: check each listing's own stamp before installing.
What does this page tell me about trailhq?
It collects every skill and MCP server on the atlas whose source lives under github.com/trailhq, with each one's verdict. It says nothing about who runs the organisation, and publisher identity is not verified here.
Can a publisher change its verdicts?
No. Each verdict comes from reading the source at a named commit. If a finding is wrong, report it with your reasoning on the listing's page and it is re-audited; the correction is public.

Keep going in your AI

Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.