Model comparison · Updated 1 Sep 2026
Qwen3 Coder Next vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
Qwen3 Coder Next is about 1.3× cheaper on input ($0.12 against $0.15 per 1M tokens), though Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is cheaper on output. Both have a 262K-token context window. For a support chatbot at 10,000 chats a day, the standard-tier bill is about $126 a month for Qwen3 Coder Next and $122 for Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct.
Cite
Cite this page
ModelsAtlas. “Qwen3 Coder Next vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct”. Retrieved 1 Sep 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/compare/qwen/3-coder-next/vs/qwen/3-vl-30b-a3b-instruct
Model A
by Qwen (Alibaba) · weights not marked open · GRIDC4
$0.12
- Source
- Our catalogue
- Retrieved
- 17 Aug 2026
Model B
by Qwen (Alibaba) · weights not marked open · GRIDC4
$0.15
- Source
- Our catalogue
- Retrieved
- 1 Sep 2026
Key numbers
Standard tier · highlighted = better
What it costs for real workloads
Monthly, standard tier, 30 days
Qwen3 Coder Next Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct · Derived from the standard-tier prices above, input and output tokens per request as stated, 30 days. Excludes caching discounts and batch. Try your own numbers.
On the atlas
Price band (A–H) × context band (1–6)
Same square. Qwen3 Coder Next and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct share C4.
Same square as Qwen3 Coder Next: Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 ($0.10), Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct ($0.10), Qwen3.5-9B ($0.10). Open C4
View the map as a table (1 squares)
| Square | Price band | Context band | Models |
|---|---|---|---|
| GRIDC4 | $0.10–0.30 | 256K–1M | Qwen3 Coder Next, Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct, Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507, Qwen3.5-9B, Qwen3.6 35B A3B, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct, Ministral 3 8B 2512, Mistral Small 4, Ministral 3 14B 2512, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct |
Capabilities side by side
Only what our records list
Neither record lists input types, so we do not claim any.
Which should you choose?
EditorialChoose Qwen3 Coder Next if…
- you pay by the token: it costs $0.12 per 1M input against $0.15
Choose Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct if…
- output dominates your bill: $0.60 per 1M output against $0.80
Each reason is a fact from the tables above. Picking between them is our judgement, and we do not benchmark quality: price and context are what we can measure, so test both on your own prompts before you commit.
Questions
Is Qwen3 Coder Next better than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct?
Which is cheaper, Qwen3 Coder Next or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct?
How much does each cost per 1M tokens?
Which has the larger context window?
Do both offer batch pricing?
Can both read images or audio?
Is either model open-weight?
What would each cost for a support chatbot?
About the two models
Qwen3 Coder Next
By Qwen (Alibaba). $0.12 input and $0.80 output per 1M tokens, 262K context, atlas square C4. Tiers listed: standard.
Full specs & pricing →Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
By Qwen (Alibaba). $0.15 input and $0.60 output per 1M tokens, 262K context, atlas square C4. Tiers listed: standard.
Full specs & pricing →Compare Qwen3 Coder Next with…
Compare Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct with…
Keep going in your AI
Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.
- Is Qwen3 Coder Next better than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct?
- Which is cheaper, Qwen3 Coder Next or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct?
- How much does each cost per 1M tokens?