Model comparison · Updated 1 Sep 2026
Qwen3.5-Flash vs Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
Qwen3.5-Flash is about 1.1× cheaper on input ($0.07 against $0.07 per 1M tokens) and on output. Qwen3.5-Flash has the larger context window (1M against 262K tokens). For a support chatbot at 10,000 chats a day, the standard-tier bill is about $52.65 a month for Qwen3.5-Flash and $56.70 for Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct.
Cite
Cite this page
ModelsAtlas. “Qwen3.5-Flash vs Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct”. Retrieved 1 Sep 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/compare/qwen/3-5/vs/qwen/3-coder-30b-a3b-instruct
Model A
by Qwen (Alibaba) · weights not marked open · GRIDB5
$0.07
- Source
- Our catalogue
- Retrieved
- 1 Sep 2026
Model B
by Qwen (Alibaba) · weights not marked open · GRIDB4
$0.07
- Source
- Our catalogue
- Retrieved
- 17 Aug 2026
Key numbers
Standard tier · highlighted = better
What it costs for real workloads
Monthly, standard tier, 30 days
Qwen3.5-Flash Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct · Derived from the standard-tier prices above, input and output tokens per request as stated, 30 days. Excludes caching discounts and batch. Try your own numbers.
On the atlas
Price band (A–H) × context band (1–6)
1 square apart. Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct (B4) sits 1 context band smaller than Qwen3.5-Flash (B5).
Same square as Qwen3.5-Flash: Qwen3.7 Flash ($0.03), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free) ($0.07), DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 ($0.08). Same square as Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct: Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B ($0.06), Gemma 4 26B A4B ($0.07), Nemotron 3 Super ($0.08). Open B5 · Open B4
View the map as a table (2 squares)
| Square | Price band | Context band | Models |
|---|---|---|---|
| GRIDB4 | <$0.10 | 256K–1M | Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct, Gemma 4 26B A4B, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B, Nemotron 3 Super, Qwen3.5-35B-A3B, Gemma 4 31B, Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 |
| GRIDB5 | <$0.10 | 1M | Qwen3.5-Flash, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free), DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731, Qwen3.7 Flash |
Capabilities side by side
Only what our records list
Neither record lists input types, so we do not claim any.
Which should you choose?
EditorialChoose Qwen3.5-Flash if…
- you pay by the token: it costs $0.07 per 1M input against $0.07
- output dominates your bill: $0.26 per 1M output against $0.28
- your prompts are long: it takes 1,000,000 tokens against 262,144
Choose Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct if…
Nothing in the recorded numbers favours Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct over Qwen3.5-Flash. Pick it for what our records do not cover — your own tests, or an account you already have with Qwen (Alibaba).
Each reason is a fact from the tables above. Picking between them is our judgement, and we do not benchmark quality: price and context are what we can measure, so test both on your own prompts before you commit.
Questions
Is Qwen3.5-Flash better than Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct?
Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5-Flash or Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct?
How much does each cost per 1M tokens?
Which has the larger context window?
Do both offer batch pricing?
Can both read images or audio?
Is either model open-weight?
What would each cost for a support chatbot?
About the two models
Qwen3.5-Flash
By Qwen (Alibaba). $0.07 input and $0.26 output per 1M tokens, 1M context, atlas square B5. Tiers listed: standard.
Full specs & pricing →Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
By Qwen (Alibaba). $0.07 input and $0.28 output per 1M tokens, 262K context, atlas square B4. Tiers listed: standard.
Full specs & pricing →Compare Qwen3.5-Flash with…
Compare Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct with…
Keep going in your AI
Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.
- Is Qwen3.5-Flash better than Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct?
- Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5-Flash or Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct?
- How much does each cost per 1M tokens?