Live survey304 models · 14 providers · 22,792 auditsAudited grill-with-docs · SAFE →What changedHow we verifyllms.txt

Model comparison · Updated 2 Nov 2026

MiniMax M2.7 vs Mistral Medium 3

MiniMax M2.7 is about 1.3× cheaper on input ($0.30 against $0.40 per 1M tokens) and on output. MiniMax M2.7 has the larger context window (205K against 131K tokens). For a support chatbot at 10,000 chats a day, the standard-tier bill is about $243 a month for MiniMax M2.7 and $360 for Mistral Medium 3.

Ask an AI about this pageGChatGPTCClaudePPerplexityGeGeminiXGrok
More
CoCopilotAIGoogle AI Mode
Cite

Cite this page

ModelsAtlas. “MiniMax M2.7 vs Mistral Medium 3”. Retrieved 2 Nov 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/compare/minimax/m2-7/vs/mistralai/mistral-medium-3

Model A

MiniMax M2.7

by MiniMax · weights not marked open · GRIDD3

Input / 1M
$0.30
observed We measured
Source
Our catalogue
Retrieved
2 Nov 2026
Output / 1M$1.20
Context205K
vs

Model B

Mistral Medium 3

by Mistral AI · weights not marked open · GRIDD3

Input / 1M
$0.40
observed We measured
Source
Our catalogue
Retrieved
17 Aug 2026
Output / 1M$2.00
Context131K

Key numbers

Standard tier · highlighted = better

MiniMax M2.7
Mistral Medium 3
Input / 1M tokens
$0.30
$0.40
Output / 1M tokens
$1.20
$2.00
Batch input / output
Not listed
Not listed
Context window
204,800
131,072
Input types
Not disclosed
Not disclosed
Weights
Not marked open
Not marked open
Tiers listed
standard
standard
Prices checked
2026-11-02
2026-08-17

What it costs for real workloads

Monthly, standard tier, 30 days

Support chatbot10k chats/day · 1.5k in, 300 out
$243/mo
$360/mo
RAG over documents2k queries/day · 12k in, 500 out
$252/mo
$348/mo
Coding agent300 tasks/day · 60k in, 8k out
$248/mo
$360/mo

MiniMax M2.7   Mistral Medium 3 · Derived from the standard-tier prices above, input and output tokens per request as stated, 30 days. Excludes caching discounts and batch. Try your own numbers.

On the atlas

Price band (A–H) × context band (1–6)

Same square. MiniMax M2.7 and Mistral Medium 3 share D3.

Same square as MiniMax M2.7: Codestral 2508 ($0.30), Command A+ ($0.30), MiniMax M2.1 ($0.30). Open D3

AFreeB<$0.10C$0.10–0.30D$0.30–1E$1–3F$3–10G$10–30H$30+1<32K232–128K3128–256K4256K–1M51M6>1MINPUT PRICE PER 1M TOKENS →CONTEXT WINDOW ↑ · position within a square follows the real valueCommand A+ · D3Muse Glimmer 30B · D3MiniMax M2.1 · D3Codestral 2508 · D3Llama 3.1 70B Instruct · D3Mistral Medium 3.1 · D3R1 0528 · D3Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) · D3MiniMax M2.7MiniMax M2.7Mistral Medium 3Mistral Medium 3
MiniMax M2.7Mistral Medium 3Nearest neighboursOpen weights
View the map as a table (1 squares)
SquarePrice bandContext bandModels
GRIDD3$0.30–1128–256KMiniMax M2.7, Mistral Medium 3, Command A+, Muse Glimmer 30B, MiniMax M2.1, Codestral 2508, Llama 3.1 70B Instruct, Mistral Medium 3.1, R1 0528, Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)

Capabilities side by side

Only what our records list

MiniMax M2.7
Mistral Medium 3
Vision input
Not disclosed
Not disclosed
Audio input
Not disclosed
Not disclosed
Open weights
Not marked open
Not marked open
Batch tier
Not listed
Not listed
Free tier
Not listed
Not listed
Thinking tier
Not listed
Not listed

Neither record lists input types, so we do not claim any.

Which should you choose?

Editorial

Choose MiniMax M2.7 if…

  • you pay by the token: it costs $0.30 per 1M input against $0.40
  • output dominates your bill: $1.20 per 1M output against $2.00
  • your prompts are long: it takes 204,800 tokens against 131,072

Choose Mistral Medium 3 if…

Nothing in the recorded numbers favours Mistral Medium 3 over MiniMax M2.7. Pick it for what our records do not cover — your own tests, or an account you already have with Mistral AI.

Each reason is a fact from the tables above. Picking between them is our judgement, and we do not benchmark quality: price and context are what we can measure, so test both on your own prompts before you commit.

Questions

Is MiniMax M2.7 better than Mistral Medium 3?
We do not benchmark quality, so we cannot say. On the recorded numbers: MiniMax M2.7 is about 1.3× cheaper on input ($0.30 against $0.40 per 1M tokens) and on output. MiniMax M2.7 has the larger context window (205K against 131K tokens). For a support chatbot at 10,000 chats a day, the standard-tier bill is about $243 a month for MiniMax M2.7 and $360 for Mistral Medium 3. Which is better for you depends on your task; test both on your own prompts.
Which is cheaper, MiniMax M2.7 or Mistral Medium 3?
MiniMax M2.7: $0.30 against $0.40 per 1M input tokens, and $1.20 against $2.00 per 1M output, on standard pricing.
How much does each cost per 1M tokens?
MiniMax M2.7: $0.30 input and $1.20 output. Mistral Medium 3: $0.40 input and $2.00 output. Standard tier, USD.
Which has the larger context window?
MiniMax M2.7, with 204,800 tokens. Mistral Medium 3 has 131,072 tokens.
Do both offer batch pricing?
Neither lists a batch tier in our catalogue.
Can both read images or audio?
Input types recorded for MiniMax M2.7: none recorded. For Mistral Medium 3: none recorded. Where a record lists none we say so rather than guess; check each vendor's documentation before relying on a capability.
Is either model open-weight?
MiniMax M2.7: not marked open-weight in our records. Mistral Medium 3: not marked open-weight in our records.
What would each cost for a support chatbot?
At 10,000 chats a day, 1,500 input and 300 output tokens each, 30 days, standard tier: about $243 a month for MiniMax M2.7 and $360 for Mistral Medium 3. This is our calculation from the listed prices, not a quote.

About the two models

MiniMax M2.7

By MiniMax. $0.30 input and $1.20 output per 1M tokens, 205K context, atlas square D3. Tiers listed: standard.

Full specs & pricing →

Mistral Medium 3

By Mistral AI. $0.40 input and $2.00 output per 1M tokens, 131K context, atlas square D3. Tiers listed: standard.

Full specs & pricing →

Compare MiniMax M2.7 with…

Keep going in your AI

Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.