Model comparison · Updated 2 Nov 2026
Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Llama 4 Maverick is about 1.4× cheaper on input ($0.19 against $0.26 per 1M tokens) and on output. Llama 4 Maverick has the larger context window (524K against 262K tokens). For a support chatbot at 10,000 chats a day, the standard-tier bill is about $143 a month for Llama 4 Maverick and $304 for Qwen3.5-122B-A10B.
Cite
Cite this page
ModelsAtlas. “Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B”. Retrieved 2 Nov 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/compare/meta/llama-4-maverick/vs/qwen/3-5-122b-a10b
Model A
by Meta · weights not marked open · GRIDC4
$0.19
- Source
- Our catalogue
- Retrieved
- 10 Oct 2026
Model B
by Qwen (Alibaba) · weights not marked open · GRIDC4
$0.26
- Source
- Our catalogue
- Retrieved
- 10 Oct 2026
Key numbers
Standard tier · highlighted = better
What it costs for real workloads
Monthly, standard tier, 30 days
Llama 4 Maverick Qwen3.5-122B-A10B · Derived from the standard-tier prices above, input and output tokens per request as stated, 30 days. Excludes caching discounts and batch. Try your own numbers.
On the atlas
Price band (A–H) × context band (1–6)
Same square. Llama 4 Maverick and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B share C4.
Same square as Llama 4 Maverick: Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 ($0.10), Qwen3.6 35B A3B ($0.10), Qwen3 Coder Next ($0.12). Open C4
View the map as a table (1 squares)
| Square | Price band | Context band | Models |
|---|---|---|---|
| GRIDC4 | $0.10–0.30 | 256K–1M | Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B, Gemma 4 31B, Ministral 3 14B 2512, Qwen3.5-9B, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct, Ministral 3 8B 2512, Mistral Small 4, Qwen3.5-27B, Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct |
Capabilities side by side
Only what our records list
Neither record lists input types, so we do not claim any.
Which should you choose?
EditorialChoose Llama 4 Maverick if…
- you pay by the token: it costs $0.19 per 1M input against $0.26
- output dominates your bill: $0.65 per 1M output against $2.08
- your prompts are long: it takes 524,288 tokens against 262,144
Choose Qwen3.5-122B-A10B if…
Nothing in the recorded numbers favours Qwen3.5-122B-A10B over Llama 4 Maverick. Pick it for what our records do not cover — your own tests, or an account you already have with Qwen (Alibaba).
Each reason is a fact from the tables above. Picking between them is our judgement, and we do not benchmark quality: price and context are what we can measure, so test both on your own prompts before you commit.
Questions
Is Llama 4 Maverick better than Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?
Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Maverick or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?
How much does each cost per 1M tokens?
Which has the larger context window?
Do both offer batch pricing?
Can both read images or audio?
Is either model open-weight?
What would each cost for a support chatbot?
About the two models
Llama 4 Maverick
By Meta. $0.19 input and $0.65 output per 1M tokens, 524K context, atlas square C4. Tiers listed: standard.
Full specs & pricing →Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
By Qwen (Alibaba). $0.26 input and $2.08 output per 1M tokens, 262K context, atlas square C4. Tiers listed: standard.
Full specs & pricing →Compare Llama 4 Maverick with…
Compare Qwen3.5-122B-A10B with…
Keep going in your AI
Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.
- Is Llama 4 Maverick better than Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?
- Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Maverick or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?
- How much does each cost per 1M tokens?