Model comparison · Updated 2 Nov 2026
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is about 1.2× cheaper on input ($0.05 against $0.06 per 1M tokens), though Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is cheaper on output. Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B has the larger context window (262K against 131K tokens). For a support chatbot at 10,000 chats a day, the standard-tier bill is about $53.06 a month for Llama 3.2 3B Instruct and $48.60 for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B.
Cite
Cite this page
ModelsAtlas. “Llama 3.2 3B Instruct vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B”. Retrieved 2 Nov 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/compare/meta/llama-3-2-3b-instruct/vs/nvidia/nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b
Model A
by Meta · weights not marked open · GRIDB3
$0.05
- Source
- Our catalogue
- Retrieved
- 2 Nov 2026
Key numbers
Standard tier · highlighted = better
What it costs for real workloads
Monthly, standard tier, 30 days
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B · Derived from the standard-tier prices above, input and output tokens per request as stated, 30 days. Excludes caching discounts and batch. Try your own numbers.
On the atlas
Price band (A–H) × context band (1–6)
1 square apart. Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (B4) sits 1 context band larger than Llama 3.2 3B Instruct (B3).
Same square as Llama 3.2 3B Instruct: gpt-oss-20b ($0.02), Mistral Nemo ($0.03), Gemma 3 12B ($0.05). Same square as Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: Gemma 4 26B A4B ($0.02), Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 ($0.09), Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct ($0.09). Open B3 · Open B4
View the map as a table (3 squares)
| Square | Price band | Context band | Models |
|---|---|---|---|
| GRIDB3 | <$0.10 | 128–256K | Llama 3.2 3B Instruct, Gemma 3 12B, Gemma 3 4B, Llama 3.1 8B Instruct, Mistral Small 3.2 24B, gpt-oss-safeguard-20b, Gemma 3 27B |
| GRIDB4 | <$0.10 | 256K–1M | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B, Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct, Gemma 4 26B A4B |
| GRIDB5 | <$0.10 | 1M | Qwen3.5-Flash, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free) |
Capabilities side by side
Only what our records list
Neither record lists input types, so we do not claim any.
Which should you choose?
EditorialChoose Llama 3.2 3B Instruct if…
- you pay by the token: it costs $0.05 per 1M input against $0.06
Choose Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B if…
- output dominates your bill: $0.24 per 1M output against $0.34
- your prompts are long: it takes 262,144 tokens against 131,072
Each reason is a fact from the tables above. Picking between them is our judgement, and we do not benchmark quality: price and context are what we can measure, so test both on your own prompts before you commit.
Questions
Is Llama 3.2 3B Instruct better than Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B?
Which is cheaper, Llama 3.2 3B Instruct or Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B?
How much does each cost per 1M tokens?
Which has the larger context window?
Do both offer batch pricing?
Can both read images or audio?
Is either model open-weight?
What would each cost for a support chatbot?
About the two models
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
By Meta. $0.05 input and $0.34 output per 1M tokens, 131K context, atlas square B3. Tiers listed: standard.
Full specs & pricing →Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
By NVIDIA. $0.06 input and $0.24 output per 1M tokens, 262K context, atlas square B4. Tiers listed: standard.
Full specs & pricing →Compare Llama 3.2 3B Instruct with…
- Gemma 3 12B$0.05
- Gemma 3 27B$0.08
- Gemma 3 4B$0.05
- gpt-oss-20b$0.02
- All alternatives →
Compare Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B with…
Keep going in your AI
Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.
- Is Llama 3.2 3B Instruct better than Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B?
- Which is cheaper, Llama 3.2 3B Instruct or Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B?
- How much does each cost per 1M tokens?