Model comparison · Updated 17 Aug 2026
Gemma 3 12B vs Llama 3.2 1B Instruct
Llama 3.2 1B Instruct is about 1.9× cheaper on input ($0.03 against $0.05 per 1M tokens), though Gemma 3 12B is cheaper on output. Gemma 3 12B has the larger context window (131K against 60K tokens). For a support chatbot at 10,000 chats a day, the standard-tier bill is about $36.00 a month for Gemma 3 12B and $30.24 for Llama 3.2 1B Instruct.
Cite
Cite this page
ModelsAtlas. “Gemma 3 12B vs Llama 3.2 1B Instruct”. Retrieved 17 Aug 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/compare/google/gemma-3-12b-it/vs/meta/llama-3-2-1b-instruct
Model A
by Google · weights not marked open · GRIDB3
$0.05
- Source
- Our catalogue
- Retrieved
- 17 Aug 2026
Key numbers
Standard tier · highlighted = better
What it costs for real workloads
Monthly, standard tier, 30 days
Gemma 3 12B Llama 3.2 1B Instruct · Derived from the standard-tier prices above, input and output tokens per request as stated, 30 days. Excludes caching discounts and batch. Try your own numbers.
On the atlas
Price band (A–H) × context band (1–6)
1 square apart. Llama 3.2 1B Instruct (B2) sits 1 context band smaller than Gemma 3 12B (B3).
Same square as Gemma 3 12B: gpt-oss-20b ($0.02), Mistral Nemo ($0.03), gpt-oss-120b ($0.03). Same square as Llama 3.2 1B Instruct: Command R7B (12-2024) ($0.04), Mistral Small 3 ($0.05). Open B3 · Open B2
View the map as a table (2 squares)
| Square | Price band | Context band | Models |
|---|---|---|---|
| GRIDB2 | <$0.10 | 32–128K | Llama 3.2 1B Instruct, Command R7B (12-2024), Mistral Small 3 |
| GRIDB3 | <$0.10 | 128–256K | Gemma 3 12B, Gemma 3 4B, Llama 3.1 8B Instruct, Llama 3.2 3B Instruct, gpt-oss-safeguard-20b, Gemma 3 27B, Qwen3 32B, Mistral Nemo, gpt-oss-120b, gpt-oss-20b |
Capabilities side by side
Only what our records list
Neither record lists input types, so we do not claim any.
Which should you choose?
EditorialChoose Gemma 3 12B if…
- output dominates your bill: $0.15 per 1M output against $0.20
- your prompts are long: it takes 131,072 tokens against 60,000
Choose Llama 3.2 1B Instruct if…
- you pay by the token: it costs $0.03 per 1M input against $0.05
Each reason is a fact from the tables above. Picking between them is our judgement, and we do not benchmark quality: price and context are what we can measure, so test both on your own prompts before you commit.
Questions
Is Gemma 3 12B better than Llama 3.2 1B Instruct?
Which is cheaper, Gemma 3 12B or Llama 3.2 1B Instruct?
How much does each cost per 1M tokens?
Which has the larger context window?
Do both offer batch pricing?
Can both read images or audio?
Is either model open-weight?
What would each cost for a support chatbot?
About the two models
Gemma 3 12B
By Google. $0.05 input and $0.15 output per 1M tokens, 131K context, atlas square B3. Tiers listed: standard.
Full specs & pricing →Llama 3.2 1B Instruct
By Meta. $0.03 input and $0.20 output per 1M tokens, 60K context, atlas square B2. Tiers listed: standard.
Full specs & pricing →Compare Gemma 3 12B with…
Compare Llama 3.2 1B Instruct with…
- Command R7B (12-2024)$0.04
- Mistral Small 3$0.05
- Mistral Nemo$0.03
- gpt-oss-120b$0.03
- All alternatives →
Keep going in your AI
Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.
- Is Gemma 3 12B better than Llama 3.2 1B Instruct?
- Which is cheaper, Gemma 3 12B or Llama 3.2 1B Instruct?
- How much does each cost per 1M tokens?