Model comparison · Updated 10 Oct 2026
Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 4.1
Claude Fable 5.1 is about 1.5× cheaper on input ($10.00 against $15.00 per 1M tokens) and on output. Claude Fable 5.1 has the larger context window (1M against 200K tokens). For a support chatbot at 10,000 chats a day, the standard-tier bill is about $9,000 a month for Claude Fable 5.1 and $13,500 for Claude Opus 4.1.
Cite
Cite this page
ModelsAtlas. “Claude Fable 5.1 vs Claude Opus 4.1”. Retrieved 10 Oct 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/compare/anthropic/claude-fable-5-1/vs/anthropic/claude-opus-4-1
Model A
by Anthropic · weights not marked open · GRIDG5
$10.00
- Source
- Our catalogue
- Retrieved
- 10 Oct 2026
Key numbers
Standard tier · highlighted = better
What it costs for real workloads
Monthly, standard tier, 30 days
Claude Fable 5.1 Claude Opus 4.1 · Derived from the standard-tier prices above, input and output tokens per request as stated, 30 days. Excludes caching discounts and batch. Try your own numbers.
On the atlas
Price band (A–H) × context band (1–6)
2 squares apart. Claude Opus 4.1 (G3) sits 2 context bands smaller than Claude Fable 5.1 (G5).
Same square as Claude Fable 5.1: Claude Fable 5 ($10.00). Same square as Claude Opus 4.1: Claude Opus 4 ($15.00). Open G5 · Open G3
View the map as a table (6 squares)
| Square | Price band | Context band | Models |
|---|---|---|---|
| GRIDF3 | $3–10 | 128–256K | Claude Opus 4.5, Claude Sonnet 4 |
| GRIDF5 | $3–10 | 1M | Claude Opus 4.6, Claude Opus 4.7, Claude Opus 4.8 |
| GRIDG3 | $10–30 | 128–256K | Claude Opus 4.1, Claude Opus 4 |
| GRIDG4 | $10–30 | 256K–1M | GPT-5 Image |
| GRIDG5 | $10–30 | 1M | Claude Fable 5.1, Claude Fable 5 |
| GRIDG6 | $10–30 | >1M | GPT-6 Astra |
Capabilities side by side
Only what our records list
Neither record lists input types, so we do not claim any.
Which should you choose?
EditorialChoose Claude Fable 5.1 if…
- you pay by the token: it costs $10.00 per 1M input against $15.00
- output dominates your bill: $50.00 per 1M output against $75.00
- your prompts are long: it takes 1,000,000 tokens against 200,000
Choose Claude Opus 4.1 if…
Nothing in the recorded numbers favours Claude Opus 4.1 over Claude Fable 5.1. Pick it for what our records do not cover — your own tests, or an account you already have with Anthropic.
Each reason is a fact from the tables above. Picking between them is our judgement, and we do not benchmark quality: price and context are what we can measure, so test both on your own prompts before you commit.
Questions
Is Claude Fable 5.1 better than Claude Opus 4.1?
Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.1 or Claude Opus 4.1?
How much does each cost per 1M tokens?
Which has the larger context window?
Do both offer batch pricing?
Can both read images or audio?
Is either model open-weight?
What would each cost for a support chatbot?
About the two models
Claude Fable 5.1
By Anthropic. $10.00 input and $50.00 output per 1M tokens, 1M context, atlas square G5. Tiers listed: batch, standard.
Full specs & pricing →Claude Opus 4.1
By Anthropic. $15.00 input and $75.00 output per 1M tokens, 200K context, atlas square G3. Tiers listed: batch, standard.
Full specs & pricing →Compare Claude Fable 5.1 with…
- Claude Fable 5$10.00
- GPT-5 Image$10.00
- GPT-6 Astra$10.00
- Claude Opus 4.6$5.00
- All alternatives →
Compare Claude Opus 4.1 with…
- Claude Opus 4$15.00
- GPT-5 Image$10.00
- Claude Opus 4.5$5.00
- Claude Sonnet 4$3.00
- All alternatives →
Keep going in your AI
Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.
- Is Claude Fable 5.1 better than Claude Opus 4.1?
- Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.1 or Claude Opus 4.1?
- How much does each cost per 1M tokens?