Provider comparison · Updated 12 Oct 2026

Anthropic vs Qwen (Alibaba)

18 models vs 80 models

Qwen (Alibaba) is cheaper at the median: $0.19 against $5.00 per 1M input tokens across paid models, about 27× less. Its cheapest paid model, Qwen3.7 Flash ($0.03), compares with Claude Haiku 5.5 ($0.10) at Anthropic. Anthropic lists 18 models; Qwen (Alibaba) lists 80 models.

Ask an AI about this pageGChatGPTCClaudePPerplexityGeGeminiXGrok
More
Cite

Cite this page

ModelsAtlas. “Anthropic vs Qwen (Alibaba)”. Retrieved 12 Oct 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/compare-providers/anthropic/qwen

At a glance

Standard tier, paid models · highlighted = better

Anthropic
Qwen (Alibaba)
Models listed
18
80
Cheapest input / 1M
$0.10
$0.03
Median in / out
$5.00 / $25.00
$0.19 / $0.80
Highest input / 1M
$15.00
$4.00
Largest context
1M
1.05M
Batch-tier models
15 of 18
0 of 80
Open-weight models
0
40
Free models
0
0

Costs for real workloads

Cheapest paid model from each provider that fits the job · monthly

Support chatbot10k chats/day · 1.5k in, 300 out
$90.00 · Claude Haiku 5.5
$25.20 · Qwen3.7 Flash
RAG over documents2k queries/day · 12k in, 500 out
$87.00 · Claude Haiku 5.5
$25.50 · Qwen3.7 Flash
Coding agent300 tasks/day · 60k in, 8k out
$90.00 · Claude Haiku 5.5
$25.56 · Qwen3.7 Flash

Derived from standard-tier prices, 30 days. “Fits the job” means the context window holds the prompt and reply. Excludes batch and caching.

Cheapest model for each capability

Input / output per 1M

Capability Anthropic Qwen (Alibaba)
1M contextClaude Haiku 5.5 $0.10 / $0.50Qwen3.7 Flash $0.03 / $0.13
Open weightsNone listedQwen2.5 7B Instruct $0.10 / $0.20
Extended thinkingNone listedQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 $0.09 / $0.55
Paid standard-tier models. A model counts only for what its record lists; one with nothing recorded is not counted.

Line-up by price tier

Paid models · input per 1M

Questions

Is Anthropic or Qwen (Alibaba) cheaper?
Qwen (Alibaba) at the median: $0.19 against $5.00 for Anthropic per 1M input tokens. Median is across each provider's paid standard-tier models, so a provider with many small models can look cheaper than its flagship is.
Which provider has more models?
Qwen (Alibaba) lists more: Anthropic 18, Qwen (Alibaba) 80. Counts are models with a page in our catalogue.
Do both offer batch pricing?
Anthropic: 15 models list a batch tier. Qwen (Alibaba): no batch tier listed. Where a model lists both, batch is a median 50% of standard for Anthropic.
Which has the larger context window?
Qwen (Alibaba) has the larger: Claude Fable 5 (1M tokens) at Anthropic, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (1.05M) at Qwen (Alibaba).
Does either provider offer open-weight models?
Anthropic: none marked open-weight. Qwen (Alibaba): 40 open-weight models.
Does either have free models?
Anthropic: none listed at no per-token charge. Qwen (Alibaba): none.

Browse more providers

Keep going in your AI

Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.